Cited by 39Personality Traits and PsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Self-Esteem Modulates the Time Course of Self-Positivity Bias in Explicit Self-Evaluation

Open access
Zhang, Hua, Guan, Lili, Qi, Mingming, Yang, Juan·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Researchers have suggested that certain individuals may show a self-positivity bias, rating themselves as possessing more positive personality traits than others. Previous evidence has shown that people evaluate self-related information in such a way as to maintain or enhance self-esteem. However, whether self-esteem would modulate the time course of self-positivity bias in explicit self-evaluation has never been explored. In the present study, 21 participants completed the Rosenberg self-esteem scale and then completed a task where they were instructed to indicate to what extent positive/negative traits described themselves. Behavioral data showed that participants endorsed positive traits as higher in self-relevance compared to the negative traits. Further, participants' self-esteem levels were positively correlated with their self-positivity bias. Electrophysiological data revealed smaller N1 amplitude and larger late positive component (LPC) amplitude to stimuli consistent with the self-positivity bias (positive-high self-relevant stimuli) when compared to stimuli that were inconsistent with the self-positivity bias (positive-low self-relevant stimuli). Moreover, only in individuals with low self-esteem, the latency of P2 was more pronounced in processing stimuli that were consistent with the self-positivity bias (negative-low self-relevant stimuli) than to stimuli that were inconsistent with the self-positivity bias (positive-low self-relevant stimuli). Overall, the present study provides additional support for the view that low self-esteem as a personality variable would affect the early attentional processing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0081169

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with low self-esteem often harbor a pessimistic outlook towards their own self-image, leading to more negative online interactions and making it harder for them to receive acceptance from online communities, thus hindering their ability to develop a robust online social support system.

    “On the contrary, individuals who possess low self-esteem often harbor a pessimistic outlook towards their own self-image, leading to more negative online interactions and making it harder for them to receive acceptance from online communities, thus hindering their ability to develop a robust online social support system [128].”

    From How social media usage affects psychological and subjective well-being: testing a moderated mediation model (2023) · cites this paper as [128]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [8]Sinha RR, Krueger J (1998) Ideographic self-evaluation and bias. Journal of Research in Personality 32.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, H., Guan, L., Qi, M., & Yang, J.
Affiliations
Southwest University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Juan
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-12-05
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
e81169
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985227945
Cited by
39
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Southwest University
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
self-esteem, self-positivity bias, self-relevance, positive personality traits, negative personality traits, N1, late positive component, P2, event-related potentials, attentional processes, self-enhancement
MeSH terms
Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Prejudice, Self-Assessment, Time Factors, Electrophysiological Phenomena, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review