Cited by 54Body Composition Measurement TechniquesSports Performance and TrainingElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography

Fat-free Mass Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Predictive Equation for Athletes using a 4-Compartment Model

Matias, Catarina N, Campa, Francesco, Santos, Diana A., Lukaski, Henry, Sardinha, Luís B., Silva, Analiza M.·2021·International Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Bioelectrical impedance analysis equations for fat-free mass prediction in healthy populations exist, nevertheless none accounts for the inter-athlete differences of the chemical composition of the fat-free mass. We aimed to develop a bioimpedance-based model for fat-free mass prediction based on the four-compartment model in a sample of national level athletes; and to cross-validate the new models in a separate cohort of athletes using a 4-compartment model as a criterion. There were 142 highly trained athletes (22.9±5.0 years) evaluated during their respective competitive seasons. Athletes were randomly split into development (n=95) and validation groups (n=47). The criterion method for fat-free mass was the 4-compartment model. Resistance and reactance were obtained with a phase-sensitive 50 kHz bioimpedance device. Athletic impedance-based models were developed (fat-free mass=− 2.261+0.327*Stature2/Resistance+0.525*Weight+5.462*Sex, where stature is in cm, Resistance is in Ω, Weight is in kg, and sex is 0 if female or 1 if male). Cross validation revealed R2 of 0.94, limits of agreement around 10% variability and no trend, as well as a high concordance correlation coefficient. The new equation can be considered valid thus affording practical means to quantify fat-free mass in elite adult athletes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/a-1179-6236

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. G B McBride, 2005, A proposal fo Strength-of-Agreement Criteria for Lin.s.Concordance Correlation Coefficient

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matias, C. N., Campa, F., Santos, D. A., Lukaski, H., Sardinha, L. B., & Silva, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • University of North Dakota (US)
Corresponding author
Campa, Francesco
Venue
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2020-08-07
Volume
42
Issue
01
Pages
27-32
ISSN
  • 0172-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3964
OpenAlex
W3047806286
Cited by
54
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Keywords
fat-free mass, bioelectrical impedance analysis, prediction equations, four-compartment model, athletes, resistance and reactance, cross-validation, elite athletes
MeSH terms
Organism Hydration Status, Body Composition, Body Water, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Sports, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review