Cited by 69Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and careAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Physical disability, anxiety and depression in people with MS: an internet-based survey via the UK MS Register

Open access
Jones, Kerina H., Jones, Philip A., Middleton, Rodden M., Ford, David V., Tuite-Dalton, Katie, Lockhart-Jones, Hazel, Peng, Jeffrey, Lyons, Ronan A. +2 more·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: People with Multiple Sclerosis are known to have a relatively high prevalence of both anxiety and depression. Studies of the relationship between physical disability and mental health in people with MS have reported mixed results, showing the need for further work. METHODS: Between May 2011 and April 2012, 4516 people completed the MSIS-29 (v.1) and HADS scales via the dedicated internet site of the UK MS Register within a 7 day time window. These responses were linked with basic demographic and descriptive data and analysed in SPSS (v.20). RESULTS: The proportions of people experiencing anxiety or depression increased with physical disability such that 38.0% of respondents with low, and 66.7% with high disability reported at least mild anxiety, and 17.1% of people with low, and 71.7% with high disability experienced at least mild depression. The multiple regression model explained 18.4% of the variance in anxiety with MSIS-29-PHYS score being the strongest predictor of anxiety. The model for depression explained 37.8% of the variance with MSIS-29-PHYS score being the strongest predictor. Some of the other variables included showed negative associations with anxiety and depression, indicating that the influence of physical disability on mental wellbeing could be underestimated. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that there is a positive relationship between physical disability and anxiety and depression, that physical disability impacts on anxiety and depression to differing extents, and that the effects vary with gender, age, disease course and disease duration. We have shown that physical disability is a predictor of anxiety and depression, and that other factors may mask the extent of this effect. Whether the causes of anxiety and depression are reactive, organic or a combination, it is essential that mental wellbeing is given due attention in caring for people with MS so that all their health needs can be met.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0104604

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anxiety negatively impacts quality of life, physical disability, and sleep quality in persons with multiple sclerosis.

    “As with depression, anxiety negatively impacts quality of life (Dubayova et al., 2013”

    From Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions for depression and anxiety in persons with multiple sclerosis (2016) · cites this paper as Jones et al., 2014

    The Results and Conclusions report an association between physical disability and anxiety in people with MS, but identify disability as a predictor of anxiety—not anxiety as a cause of disability. The Introduction notes low quality-of-life scores in people with MS without linking them to anxiety, and the retrieved passages do not address sleep quality. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, K. H., Jones, P. A., Middleton, R. M., Ford, D. V., Tuite-Dalton, K., Lockhart-Jones, H., Peng, J., Lyons, R. A., John, A., & Noble, J. G.
Affiliations
Swansea University (GB)
Corresponding author
Jones, Kerina H.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-08-25
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
e104604
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109576398
Cited by
69
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Multiple Sclerosis Society
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K006525/1)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/L007444/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, physical disability, anxiety, depression, mental health, MSIS-29, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, disability severity, disease duration, clinical course, gender differences, age differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Multiple Sclerosis, Registries, Regression Analysis, Cohort Studies, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review