Cited by 249Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTryptophan and brain disorders

Depression and anxiety in multiple sclerosis. A clinical and MRI study in 95 subjects

Zorzon, Marino, de Masi, Roberto, Nasuelli, Davide, Ukmar, Maja, Pozzi Mucelli, Roberto, Cazzato, Giuseppe, Bratina, Alessio, Zivadinov, Robert·2001·Journal of Neurology

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between involvement of specific areas of the brain and the occurrence of depression and anxiety in patients with multiple sclerosis. We studied 95 patients (62 women and 33 men, mean age 39.5 years, SD 11.2) with definite MS, 97 patients (65 women and 32 men, mean age 40.7, SD 11.9) suffering from chronic rheumatoid diseases and 110 healthy subjects (71 women and 39 men, mean age 40.1, SD 12.7). The disability, the independence, the cognitive performances, the depressive and anxiety symptoms were assessed. The diagnosis of major depression was made according to the DSM-IV. The patients with multiple sclerosis underwent a 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance examination including T1 and T2 weighted images. Calculation of regional and total lesion loads and brain volumes were performed. The number (%) of subjects with a diagnosis of major depression was 18 (18.9) among MS cases, 16 (16.5) among controls with chronic disease (p=NS), and 4 (3.6) among healthy volunteers (p < 0.0001). The Hamilton Depression and Anxiety rating scales median scores were 5 and 18, respectively in the MS patients, 5 (p= NS) and 14 (p= NS) in the chronic rheumatoid diseases controls, and 3 (p= < 0.0001) and 6 (p= < 0.0001) in the healthy controls. Both severity of depressive symptoms and diagnosis of major depression correlated, albeit weakly, with right frontal lesion load (r=0.22, p=0.035, and r=0.23, p=0.026, respectively) and right temporal…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s004150170184

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zorzon, M., de Masi, R., Nasuelli, D., Ukmar, M., Pozzi Mucelli, R., Cazzato, G., Bratina, A., & Zivadinov, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Trieste (IT)
  • Ospedale di Cattinara (IT)
Venue
Journal of Neurology
Published
2001-05-28
Volume
248
Issue
5
Pages
416-421
ISSN
  • 0012-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-5354
  • 1432-1459
OpenAlex
W2055574804
Cited by
249
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, depression, anxiety, brain lesions, lesion load, brain volume, temporal lobe, frontal lobe, disability, functional independence, cognitive performance, neuropsychiatric symptoms, right hemisphere dominance, depression severity, anxiety levels, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review