Cited by 32Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology

Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCMI-4317 Modulates Fiaf/Angptl4 in Intestinal Epithelial Cells and Circulating Level in Mice

Open access
Jacouton, Elsa, Mach, Núria, Cadiou, Julie, Lapaque, Nicolas, Clément, Karine, Doré, Joël, van Hylckama Vlieg, Johan E. T., Smokvina, Tamara +1 more·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Identification of new targets for metabolic diseases treatment or prevention is required. In this context, FIAF/ANGPTL4 appears as a crucial regulator of energy homeostasis. Lactobacilli are often considered to display beneficial effect for their hosts, acting on different regulatory pathways. The aim of the present work was to study the effect of several lactobacilli strains on Fiaf gene expression in human intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) and on mice tissues to decipher the underlying mechanisms. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Nineteen lactobacilli strains have been tested on HT-29 human intestinal epithelial cells for their ability to regulate Fiaf gene expression by RT-qPCR. In order to determine regulated pathways, we analysed the whole genome transcriptome of IECs. We then validated in vivo bacterial effects using C57BL/6 mono-colonized mice fed with normal chow. RESULTS: We identified one strain (Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCMI-4317) that modulated Fiaf expression in IECs. This regulation relied potentially on bacterial surface-exposed molecules and seemed to be PPAR-γ independent but PPAR-α dependent. Transcriptome functional analysis revealed that multiple pathways including cellular function and maintenance, lymphoid tissue structure and development, as well as lipid metabolism were regulated by this strain. The regulation of immune system and lipid and carbohydrate metabolism was also confirmed by overrepresentation of Gene Ontology terms analysis. In vivo, circulating FIAF protein was increased by the strain but this phenomenon was not correlated with modulation Fiaf expression in tissues (except a trend in distal small intestine). CONCLUSION: We showed that Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCMI-4317 induced Fiaf expression in human IECs, and increased circulating FIAF protein level in mice. Moreover, this effect was accompanied by transcriptome modulation of several pathways including immune response and metabolism in vitro.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0138880

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fermented foods or probiotics can improve stress-induced symptoms such as depression, mood disturbance and digestive issues.

    “Fermented foods enriched with Lactobacillus sp. and Bifidobacteria sp [129] can result in specific changes in gut microbiota activity, improving stress-induced symptoms such as depression, mood disturbance as well as digestive issues [130].”
  • Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCMI-4317 was able to regulate multiple pathways including cellular function and maintenance, lymphoid tissue structure and development, immune system response as well as lipid metabolism in epithelial cells.

    “For instance, the strain Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCMI–4317 was able to regulate multiple pathways including cellular function and maintenance, lymphoid tissue structure and development, immune system response as well as lipid metabolism in epithelial cells [163].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacouton, E., Mach, N., Cadiou, J., Lapaque, N., Clément, K., Doré, J., van Hylckama Vlieg, J. E. T., Smokvina, T., & Blottière, H. M.
Affiliations
  • AgroParisTech (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Danone (France) (FR)
Corresponding author
Blottière, Hervé M
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-10-06
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
e0138880
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1947077777
Cited by
32
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Danone
  • Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Keywords
FIAF, ANGPTL4, intestinal epithelial cells, probiotic bacteria, gene expression regulation, PPARα, PPARγ, lipid metabolism, energy homeostasis, intestinal transcriptome, immune response
MeSH terms
Angiopoietin-Like Protein 4, Animals, Epithelial Cells, Humans, Intestines, Lactobacillus, Mice, Inbred C57BL, HT29 Cells, Angiopoietins, Mice, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review