Cited by 63Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsFrailty in Older Adults

Objectively Measured Walking Duration and Sedentary Behaviour and Four-Year Mortality in Older People

Open access
Klenk, Jochen, Dallmeier, Dhayana, Denkinger, Michael Dieter, Rapp, Kilian, Koenig, Wolfgang, Rothenbacher, Dietrich, ActiFE Study Group·2016·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical activity is an important component of health. Recommendations based on sensor measurements are sparse in older people. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of objectively measured walking and sedentary duration on four-year mortality in community-dwelling older people. METHODS: Between March 2009 and April 2010, physical activity of 1271 participants (≥65 years, 56.4% men) from Southern Germany was measured over one week using a thigh-worn uni-axial accelerometer (activPAL; PAL Technologies, Glasgow, Scotland). Mortality was assessed during a four-year follow-up. Cox-proportional-hazards models were used to estimate the associations between walking (including low to high intensity) and sedentary duration with mortality. Models were adjusted for age and sex, additional epidemiological variables, and selected biomarkers. RESULTS: An inverse relationship between walking duration and mortality with a minimum risk for the 3rd quartile (102.2 to128.4 minutes walking daily) was found even after multivariate adjustment with HRs for quartiles 2 to 4 compared to quartile 1 of 0.45 (95%-CI: 0.26; 0.76), 0.18 (95%-CI: 0.08; 0.41), 0.39 (95%-CI: 0.19; 0.78), respectively. For sedentary duration an age- and sex-adjusted increased mortality risk was observed for the 4th quartile (daily sedentary duration ≥1137.2 min.) (HR 2.05, 95%-CI: 1.13; 3.73), which diminished, however, after full adjustment (HR 1.63, 95%-CI: 0.88; 3.02). Furthermore, our results suggest effect modification between walking and sedentary duration, such that in people with low walking duration a high sedentary duration was noted as an independent factor for increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, walking duration was clearly associated with four-year overall mortality in community-dwelling older people.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0153779

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Objectively measured physical activity levels, categorized into sedentary behaviour, light PA and MVPA, can be used to assess the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause death.

    “Objectively measured PA levels, categorized into sedentary behaviour, light PA and MVPA, can be used to assess the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause death”
  • MVPA measured with triaxial accelerometers is associated with lower mortality than light physical activity or sedentary behaviour in several US cohorts and a Swedish population-based cohort.

    “Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), measured with the use of triaxial accelerometers, was associated with a lower mortality than light physical activity or sedentary behaviour in several US cohorts and in a Swedish population-based cohort34–38.”
  • Wearable-measured physical activity has an inverse dose-dependent relationship with all-cause mortality.

    “Several studies have shown wearable-measured physical activity to have an inverse dose-dependent relationship with all-cause mortality5,34–38.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klenk, J., Dallmeier, D., Denkinger, M. D., Rapp, K., Koenig, W., Rothenbacher, D., & ActiFE Study Group
Affiliations
Universität Ulm (DE)
Corresponding author
Klenk, Jochen
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2016-04-15
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
e0153779
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2336288341
Cited by
63
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science, Research and Arts, state of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
  • “Hertha-Nathorff” Program at the Ulm University
  • Robert Bosch Foundation, Stuttgart, Germany
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
walking time, sedentary behavior, mortality, older adults, physical activity, accelerometer-measured activity, effect modification, community-dwelling older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Germany, Health Status, Hemodynamics, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Motor Activity, Prospective Studies, Biomarkers, Proportional Hazards Models, Walking, Exercise Tolerance, Sedentary Behavior, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review