Cited by 23Hair Growth and DisordersWound Healing and TreatmentsTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

In vitro skin models to study epithelial regeneration from the hair follicle

Open access
Ojeh, Nkemcho, Akgül, Baki, Tomic-Canic, Marjana, Philpott, Mike, Navsaria, Harshad·2017·PLOS ONE

Abstract

The development of dermal equivalents (DEs) for the treatment of burns has contributed toward efficient wound closure. A collagen-glycosaminoglycan DE (C-GAG) grafted with hair follicles converted a full-thickness wound to partial-thickness resulting in complete wound closure and restored hair. In this study we compared the ability of both intact pilosebaceous units (PSU) or truncated hair follicles (THF) to regenerate a multilayered epidermis in vitro when implanted into de-epidermalized dermis (DED) or C-GAG with the epidermis generated in vivo using C-CAG. Keratinocytes explanted from the outer root sheath of PSU and THF in both DED and C-GAG but only formed a multilayered epidermis with PSU in DED. PSU were more effective at forming multilayered epidermis in DED than THF. Both DED and C-GAG skin expressed proliferation (PCNA), differentiation (K1, K10), hyperproliferation (K6, K16), basal (K14), putative stem cell (p63), extracellular matrix protein (Collagen IV), mesenchymal (vimentin) and adherens junction (β-catenin) markers. These data suggest DEs supported initial maintenance of the implanted hair follicles, in particular PSU, and provide an excellent model with which to investigate the regulation of hair follicle progenitor epithelial cells during epidermal regeneration. Although neither PSU nor THF formed multilayered epidermis in C-CAG in vitro, hair follicles implanted into engrafted C-GAG on a burns patient resulted in epithelial regeneration and expression of proliferation and differentiation markers in a similar manner to that seen in vitro. However, the failure of C-GAG to support epidermal regeneration in vitro suggests in vivo factors are essential for full epidermal regeneration using C-GAG.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0174389

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The wounding keratins KRT6/KRT16 were expressed in the grafted region on days 16 and 37 in HSEs transplanted onto humans, with their expression disappearing a year after transplantation.

    “the wounding keratins KRT6/KRT16 were expressed in the grafted region on days 16 and 37 in HSEs transplanted onto humans, with their expression disappearing a year after transplantation.68”

    From Single-cell transcriptomics of human-skin-equivalent organoids (2023) · cites this paper as [68]

    The Results section (‘Hyperproliferation and differentiation profile of skin equivalents and neo-epidermis in vivo’; page unavailable) reports K6 and K16 staining in the neo-epithelium at days 16 and 37, with patterns resembling control scalp skin at one year. But the Materials and methods section (‘Micrografting hair follicles into the engrafted C-GAG’; page unavailable) describes hair follicles micrografted into a scaffold engrafted on a burn patient, not HSEs transplanted onto humans. The paper also does not say K6/K16 expression disappeared entirely: control scalp skin retained expression in hair-follicle structures. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • KRT14 was expressed in all layers of the epidermis until a year post grafting, where it resumed normal BAS layer expression.

    “KRT14 was expressed in all layers of the epidermis until a year post grafting, where it resumed normal BAS layer expression”

    From Single-cell transcriptomics of human-skin-equivalent organoids (2023) · cites this paper as [68]

    The Results section reports that K14 staining extended throughout the suprabasal layers at days 16 and 37 post-micrografting and resembled control scalp skin at one year. It does not establish that this pattern persisted throughout the intervening year. It also describes normal control-skin expression in the basal layer and one or two suprabasal layers, not the basal layer alone. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The tissue did not reach homeostasis until a year post grafting.

    “suggesting that the tissue did not reach homeostasis until a year post grafting.68”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ojeh, N., Akgül, B., Tomic-Canic, M., Philpott, M., & Navsaria, H.
Affiliations
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Ojeh, Nkemcho
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2017-03-28
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
e0174389
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2600718354
Cited by
23
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
dermal equivalent, hair follicle, epidermal regeneration, pilosebaceous unit, keratinocytes, outer root sheath, burn wound closure, keratinocyte differentiation markers, β-catenin, p63, wound healing
MeSH terms
Epidermal Cells, Cells, Cultured, Epidermis, Humans, Regeneration, Keratinocytes, Skin, Artificial, Hair Follicle, Cell Proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review