Cited by 42Morphological variations and asymmetryHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Facial shape differences between rats selected for tame and aggressive behaviors

Open access
Singh, Nandini, Albert, Frank W., Plyusnina, Irina, Trut, Lyudmila, Pӓӓbo, Svante, Harvati, Katerina·2017·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Domestication has been consistently accompanied by a suite of traits called the domestication syndrome. These include increased docility, changes in coat coloration, prolonged juvenile behaviors, modified function of adrenal glands and reduced craniofacial dimensions. Wilkins et al recently proposed that the mechanistic factor underlying traits that encompass the domestication syndrome was altered neural crest cell (NCC) development. NCC form the precursors to a large number of tissue types including pigment cells, adrenal glands, teeth and the bones of the face. The hypothesis that deficits in NCC development can account for the domestication syndrome was partly based on the outcomes of Dmitri Belyaev's domestication experiments initially conducted on silver foxes. After generations of selecting for tameness, the foxes displayed phenotypes observed in domesticated species. Belyaev also had a colony of rats selected over 64 generations for either tameness or defensive aggression towards humans. Here we focus on the facial morphology of Belyaev's tame, 'domesticated' rats to test whether: 1) tameness in rats causes craniofacial changes similar to those observed in the foxes; 2) facial shape, i.e. NCC-derived region, is distinct in the tame and aggressive rats. We used computed-tomography scans of rat skulls and landmark-based geometric morphometrics to quantify and analyze the facial skeleton. We found facial shape differences between the tame and aggressive rats that were independent of size and which mirrored changes seen in domesticated animals compared to their wild counterparts. However, there was no evidence of reduced sexual dimorphism in the face of the tame rats. This indicates that not all morphological changes in NCC-derived regions in the rats follow the pattern of shape change reported in domesticated animals or the silver foxes. Thus, certain phenotypic trends that are part of the domestication syndrome might not be consistently present in all experimental animal models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0175043

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selection for tameness is enough to bring about a constellation of domestic traits, many of which humans share.

    “Crucially, this suggests that selection for tameness is enough to bring about a constellation of domestic traits (see [33]), many of which humans share.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [15]Trut N. Canid Domestication: The Farm-Fox Experiment. 2000; Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27857815.pdf
  2. [19]Slice DE. Modern morphometrics. Modern morphometrics in physical anthropology. Springer; 2005 pp. 1– 45.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, N., Albert, F. W., Plyusnina, I., Trut, L., Pӓӓbo, S., & Harvati, K.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Institute of Cytology and Genetics (RU)
  • Senckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment (DE)
Corresponding author
Singh, Nandini
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2017-04-03
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
e0175043
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2605254503
Cited by
42
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (INST 37/706)
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
domestication syndrome, neural crest cells, facial morphology, craniofacial morphology, tameness, defensive aggression, silver fox, rats, sexual dimorphism, skull shape, geometric morphometrics, animal domestication
MeSH terms
Domestication, Aggression, Animals, Animals, Domestic, Behavior, Animal, Breeding, Face, Facial Expression, Foxes, Skull, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review