Cited by 133Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingNeural dynamics and brain function

Brain entropy and human intelligence: a resting-state fMRI study

Open access
Saxe, Glenn N., Calderone, Daniel, Morales, Leah J.·2018·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Human intelligence comprises comprehension of and reasoning about an infinitely variable external environment. A brain capable of large variability in neural configurations, or states, will more easily understand and predict variable external events. Entropy measures the variety of configurations possible within a system, and recently the concept of brain entropy has been defined as the number of neural states a given brain can access. This study investigates the relationship between human intelligence and brain entropy, to determine whether neural variability as reflected in neuroimaging signals carries information about intellectual ability. We hypothesize that intelligence will be positively associated with entropy in a sample of 892 healthy adults, using resting-state fMRI. Intelligence is measured with the Shipley Vocabulary and WASI Matrix Reasoning tests. Brain entropy was positively associated with intelligence. This relation was most strongly observed in the prefrontal cortex, inferior temporal lobes, and cerebellum. This relationship between high brain entropy and high intelligence indicates an essential role for entropy in brain functioning. It demonstrates that access to variable neural states predicts complex behavioral performance, and specifically shows that entropy derived from neuroimaging signals at rest carries information about intellectual capacity. Future work in this area may elucidate the links between brain entropy in both resting and active states and various forms of intelligence. This insight has the potential to provide predictive information about adaptive behavior and to delineate the subdivisions and nature of intelligence based on entropic patterns.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0191582

Cites

51 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence on the exact nature of the relationship between intelligence and complexity measures is currently mixed.

    “Evidence on the exact nature of the relationship between intelligence and complexity measures is currently mixed ( Saxe et al., 2018 ; Dreszer et al., 2020 ; Wang, 2021 ; Thiele et al., 2023 ).”

    From What does it mean for consciousness to be multidimensional? A narrative review (2024) · cites this paper as Saxe et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7]Pellionisz A. Modeling of neurons and neuronal networks. Schmitt FO, Worden FG, Neurosciences Research Program., editors. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press; 1979 vii, 1185 p. p.
  2. [30]Schoenberg MR, Scott JG, Duff K, Adams RL. Estimation of WAIS-III FSIQ from combined reading, subtest performance, and demographic variables and Combined Oklahoma Premorbid Intelligence Estimate (COPIE). Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 2003; 18(7): 804-.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saxe, G. N., Calderone, D., & Morales, L. J.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Saxe, Glenn N.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2018-02-12
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
e0191582
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2785432401
Cited by
133
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4
FWCI
8.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • NYU Langone Medical Center
  • Harvard University
  • Centre d'Imagerie BioMédicale
  • Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
brain entropy, intelligence, neural states, prefrontal cortex, inferior temporal lobe, cerebellum, cognitive performance, adaptive behavior
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Intelligence, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review