Cited by 32Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The development of the Japanese version of the compassionate engagement and action scales

Open access
Asano, Kenichi, Kotera, Yasuhiro, Tsuchiya, Masao, Ishimura, Ikuo, Lin, Shuzhen, Matsumoto, Yuki, Matos, Marcela, Basran, Jaskaran +1 more·2020·PLoS ONE

Abstract

The last few years have seen increasing research on self-report measures of compassion. The Compassionate Engagement and Action Scale (CEAS) is rooted in an evolutionary approach to compassion, which focuses on the competencies of compassion those are engagement with distress or suffering, and taking action to alleviate and prevent it. This study sought to validate the CEAS in a Japanese population using a cross-sectional design. A total of 279 students (82 males, 191 females, 6 unknown) answered self-report questionnaires, including the Japanese version of CEAS. We found single-factor structures for compassion for others scales, compassion from others scales, and compassion for self scales. All scales were found to have acceptable internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity, and construct validity. Even though some limitations, these results indicate that the Japanese version of CEAS is an adequately constructed and useful measure to assess compassionate engagement and action toward others, from others, and for the self with Japanese population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0230875

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [25]Adachi K, Ueno T. The standardization of DASS Japanese version (Ⅰ). The 24th congress of the Japanese Association of health psychology. Tokyo; 2011. pp. 11–12.
  2. [26]Otsuka Y. The COPE inventory: a theoretically based coping questionnaire. Hiroshima Psychol Res. 2008; 8, 121– 128.
  3. [27]Sumino Z. Jinseinitaisuru Manzokukanshakudo (the Satisfaction With Life Scale [SWLS]) nihongobansakuseinokokoromi. Annu Conv Japanese Assoc Educ Psychol. 1994; 36, 192.
  4. [31]Arimitsu K, Aoki Y, Furukita M, Tada A, Togashi R. Construction and validation of a short form of the Japanese version of the Self-Compassion Scale. Komazawa Annu Reports Psychol. 2016; 18, 1– 9.
  5. [47]Koyasu M, Kusumi T, Carvalho Filho MK, Hashimoto K, Fujita K, Suzuki S, et al A cross-national study on happiness: Data from thirteen countries. Japanese Psychological Review. 2012; 55, 70– 89.
  6. [48]Diener E, Diener M, Diener C. Factors Predicting the Subjective Well-Being of Nations In: Diener E., editors. Culture and Well-Being. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 38 Springer, Dordrecht; 2009.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asano, K., Kotera, Y., Tsuchiya, M., Ishimura, I., Lin, S., Matsumoto, Y., Matos, M., Basran, J., & Gilbert, P.
Affiliations
  • Mejiro University (JP)
  • University of Derby (GB)
  • Advantage Risk Management Co., Ltd. (Japan) (JP)
  • Tokyo Seitoku University (JP)
  • University of Tsukuba (JP)
  • Tokushima Bunri University (JP)
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
Corresponding author
Asano, Kenichi
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2020-04-01
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
e0230875
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3014845741
Cited by
32
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • University of Derby Online Research Archive. (University of Derby) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI 15K17289)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
compassion, compassionate action, compassion for others, scale validation, Japanese version
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Empathy, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review