Cited by 435Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Using deep learning to model the hierarchical structure and function of a cell

Open access
Ma, Jianzhu, Yu, Michael Ku, Fong, Samson, Ono, Keiichiro, Sage, Eric, Demchak, Barry, Sharan, Roded, Ideker, Trey·2018·Nature Methods

Abstract

Although artificial neural networks are powerful classifiers, their internal structures are hard to interpret. In the life sciences, extensive knowledge of cell biology provides an opportunity to design visible neural networks (VNNs) that couple the model's inner workings to those of real systems. Here we develop DCell, a VNN embedded in the hierarchical structure of 2,526 subsystems comprising a eukaryotic cell (http://d-cell.ucsd.edu/). Trained on several million genotypes, DCell simulates cellular growth nearly as accurately as laboratory observations. During simulation, genotypes induce patterns of subsystem activities, enabling in silico investigations of the molecular mechanisms underlying genotype-phenotype associations. These mechanisms can be validated, and many are unexpected; some are governed by Boolean logic. Cumulatively, 80% of the importance for growth prediction is captured by 484 subsystems (21%), reflecting the emergence of a complex phenotype. DCell provides a foundation for decoding the genetics of disease, drug resistance and synthetic life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.4627

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Understanding how a cellular subsystem or protein complex is disrupted in a diseased tissue can aid development of therapeutic interventions.

    “Every AIVC prediction could be substantiated with the corresponding multi-scale interactions that determine resulting states, e.g., understanding how a cellular subsystem or protein complex is disrupted in a diseased tissue can aid development of therapeutic interventions.118,119”

    From How to build the virtual cell with artificial intelligence: Priorities and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as [119]

    The Results section (‘Explaining a Genotype-Phenotype Association’; page not provided) shows that the model can identify disrupted cellular subsystems. The Discussion (page not provided) proposes using such models to analyze patient genotypes and potential drug targets for personalized therapy. It does not examine a diseased tissue or demonstrate that identifying a disrupted protein complex led to a therapeutic intervention. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • XAI is useful in basic research, as in efforts to create "visible" deep neural networks that provide automatic explanations of the impact of a genotypic change on cellular phenotypic states.

    “XAI is also useful in basic research, for instance, efforts in creating “visible” deep neural networks that provide automatic explanations of the impact of a genotypic change on cellular phenotypic states110.”
  • Applied to a genotype-phenotype association study of yeast genetic screening data, an AI/ML network could map mutated genes to cellular growth rates.

    “Applied to a genotype-phenotype association study of yeast genetic screening data, it was shown that the AI/ML network could map mutated genes to cellular growth rates.184”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [35]Szappanos B Kovács K Szamecz B Honti F An integrated approach to characterize genetic interaction networks in yeast metabolism Nature 2011 PMC3125439 21623372
  2. [37]Lipton ZC The mythos of model interpretability Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.03490 2017 · arXiv
  3. [46]Lee CY Xie S Gallagher PW Zhang Z Tu Z Deeply-Supervised Nets AISTATS 2 5 2015

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, J., Yu, M. K., Fong, S., Ono, K., Sage, E., Demchak, B., Sharan, R., & Ideker, T.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Ideker, Trey
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2018-03-05
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
290-298
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W2790179710
Cited by
435
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 26
FWCI
16.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Nature
  • National Institutes of Health (OT3TR002026)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG009979)
  • National Cancer Institute (U54CA209891)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM084279, P41GM103504)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES014811)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
eukaryotic cells, genotype-phenotype correlation, Boolean logic, synthetic biology, drug resistance, disease genetics, synthetic life, DCell
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Cell Physiological Phenomena, Computer Simulation, Gene Expression Regulation, Genotype, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review