Cited by 17Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsThyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Prevalence and factors associated with chronic use of levothyroxine: A cohort study

Open access
Janett-Pellegri, Camilla, Wildisen, Lea, Feller, Martin, Del Giovane, Cinzia, Moutzouri, Elisavet, Grolimund, Oliver, Walter, Patrick, Waeber, Gérard +3 more·2021·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Importance: Levothyroxine prescriptions are rising worldwide. However, there are few data on factors associated with chronic use. Objective: To assess the prevalence of chronic levothyroxine use, its rank among other chronic drugs and factors associated with chronic use. To assess the proportion of users outside the therapeutic range of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH). Design: Cohort study (CoLaus|PsyCoLaus) with recruitment from 2003 to 2006. Follow-ups occurred 5 and 10 years after baseline. Participants: A random sample of Lausanne (Switzerland) inhabitants aged 35–75 years. Main outcomes: We evaluated the prevalence of chronic levothyroxine use and we then ranked it among the other most used chronic drugs. The ranking was compared to data from health insurance across the country. We assessed the association between each factor and chronic levothyroxine use in multivariable logistic regression models. The proportion of chronic levothyroxine users outside the usual TSH therapeutic range was assessed. Results: 4,334 participants were included in the analysis (mean±SD age 62.8±10.4 years, 54.9% women). 166 (3.8%) participants were chronic levothyroxine users. Levothyroxine was the second most prescribed chronic drug after aspirin in the cohort (8.2%) and the third most prescribed when using Swiss-wide insurance data. In multivariable analysis, chronic levothyroxine use was associated with increasing age [odds ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 1.01–1.05 per 1-year increase]; female sex [11.87 (5.24–26.89)]; BMI [1.06 (1.02–1.09) per 1-kg/m2 increase]; number of concomitant drugs [1.22 (1.16–1.29) per 1-drug increase]; and family history of thyroid pathologies [2.18 (1.37–3.48)]. Among chronic levothyroxine users with thyroid hormones assessment (n = 157), 42 (27%) were outside the TSH therapeutic range (17% overtreated and 10% undertreated). Conclusions: In this population-based study, levothyroxine ranked second among chronic drugs. Age, female sex, BMI, number of drugs and family history of thyroid pathologies were associated with chronic levothyroxine use. More than one in four chronic users were over- or undertreated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0261160

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nine studies over nearly 30 years across five different countries show that only 50%-70% of patients prescribed levothyroxine maintain serum TSH within reference range.

    “nine studies over nearly 30 years across five different countries show that only 50% -70% of patients prescribed levothyroxine maintain serum TSH within reference range. 20,30 -34”

    From Use of liothyronine (T3) in hypothyroidism: Joint British Thyroid Association/Society for endocrinology consensus statement (2023) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Discussion (‘Proportion of levothyroxine users within the therapeutic range’; page unavailable) reports substantial overtreatment in other studies, including 41% among older US patients. But this paper does not establish that nine studies spanning nearly 30 years and five countries found 50%–70% within range. Its own finding is that 27% of chronic users were outside the therapeutic range—approximately 73% within it. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Levothyroxine has a narrow therapeutic index, and both under-treatment (TSH above reference range) and over-treatment (TSH below reference range) are common, with cross-sectional studies consistently showing that 30%-50% of patients on levothyroxine have TSH values outside of the laboratory reference range.

    “Levothyroxine has a narrow therapeutic index, however, and both under -treatment (TSH above the reference range) and over -treatment (TSH below the reference range) are common, with cross -sectional studies consistently showing that 30% -50% of patients on levothyroxine have TSH values outside of the laboratory reference range. 20,30 -34,65”

    From Use of liothyronine (T3) in hypothyroidism: Joint British Thyroid Association/Society for endocrinology consensus statement (2023) · cites this paper as [32]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]M A. Medicines Use and Spending in the U.S.: A Review of 2016 and Outlook to 2021 2017 [cited 2018 March, 19]. https://www.iqvia.com/-/media/iqvia/pdfs/institute-reports/medicines-use-and-spending-in-the-us.pdf?&_=1552986119356.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janett-Pellegri, C., Wildisen, L., Feller, M., Del Giovane, C., Moutzouri, E., Grolimund, O., Walter, P., Waeber, G., Marques-Vidal, P., Vollenweider, P., & Rodondi, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Corresponding author
Rodondi, Nicolas
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2021-12-20
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
e0261160
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200281330
Cited by
17
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (SNSF 320030-172676, SNSF 32003B-173092, 3200B0–105993, 3200B0-118308, 33CSCO-122661, 33CS30-139468, 33CS30-148401, 32473B-182210)
  • Université de Lausanne
  • SASIS
  • santésuisse
  • GlaxoSmithKline
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
levothyroxine, chronic drug use, thyroid hormone replacement, thyroid-stimulating hormone, overtreatment, undertreatment, prevalence, risk factors, body mass index, polypharmacy, family history of thyroid disease, prescribing patterns, aspirin comparison, older adults, women
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Drug Utilization, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Thyroid Gland, Thyroxine, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review