CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Induced interpretation bias affects free recall and episodic memory bias in social anxiety

Park, Hye Ryeong, Lee, Jong-Sun·2023·PLOS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0289584
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The combined effect of each cognitive bias, interpretation, attention, and memory bias, is known to play a causal role in the etiology and maintenance of social anxiety. However, little is known about how each type of bias (i.e., interpretation, memory bias) acts during social anxiety. The present study aimed to investigate whether experimentally induced interpretation bias using the cognitive bias modification (CBM) paradigm would influence free recall and episodic memory biases in a Korean sample. A total of 61 participants were randomly assigned to either a positive (n = 30) or negative (n = 31) CBM group. The study used CBM scenarios that were auditory-specific and focused on social anxiety symptoms. The results showed that interpretation biases could be induced, and they resulted in training congruent state mood and memory biases on both free-recall memory and autobiographical memory, which partly confirmed the combined cognitive biases hypothesis proposed by Hirsch, Clark (1).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0289584

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Ministry of Health and Welfare, 2017, The 2016 survey of mental disorders in Korea. Ministry of Health and Welfare website
  2. YR Cho, 1997, Cognitive assessment of socal anxiety: A study on the development and validity of the Social Interaction Self-Efficacy Scale, Psychological Research Issue, 397
  3. SE Bruce, 2005, Influence of psychiatric comorbidity on recovery and recurrence in generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, and panic disorder: a 12-year prospective study, American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 1179, 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.6.1179 · DOI · Paper page
  4. L Stopa, 2000, Social phobia and interpretation of social events, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 273, 10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00043-1 · DOI
  5. N Amir, 1998, Automatic activation and strategic avoidance of threat-relevant information in social phobia, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 285, 10.1037/0021-843X.107.2.285 · DOI
  6. CT Taylor, 2010, Attentional bias away from positive social information mediates the link between social anxiety and anxiety vulnerability to a social stressor, Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 403, 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.02.004 · DOI · Paper page
  7. CR Hirsch, 2000, Impaired positive inferential bias in social phobia, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 705, 10.1037/0021-843X.109.4.705 · DOI · Paper page
  8. SE Blackwell, 2015, Positive imagery-based cognitive bias modification as a web-based treatment tool for depressed adults: A randomized controlled trial, Clinical Psychological Science, 3, 91, 10.1177/2167702614560746 · DOI
  9. MW Cody, 2010, Post-event processing and memory bias for performance feedback in social anxiety, Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 468, 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.03.003 · DOI
  10. RM Rapee, 1994, Memory bias in social phobia, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 89, 10.1016/0005-7967(94)90087-6 · DOI
  11. BL Glazier, 2017, Social anxiety and biased recall of positive information: It’s not the content, it’s the valence, Behavior Therapy, 48, 533, 10.1016/j.beth.2016.08.001 · DOI
  12. CR Hirsch, 2006, Imagery and interpretations in social phobia: support for the combined cognitive biases hypothesis, Behavior Therapy, 37, 223, 10.1016/j.beth.2006.02.001 · DOI
  13. PT Hertel, 2008, Biases in interpretation and memory in generalized social phobia, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 278, 10.1037/0021-843X.117.2.278 · DOI
  14. TB Tran, 2011, Cognitive bias modification: induced interpretive biases affect memory, Emotion, 11, 145, 10.1037/a0021754 · DOI
  15. EA Holmes, 2005, Mental imagery and emotion: a special relationship?, Emotion, 5, 489, 10.1037/1528-3542.5.4.489 · DOI · Paper page
  16. LS Radloff, 1977, The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population, Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385, 10.1177/014662167700100306 · DOI · Paper page
  17. MJ Cho, 1993, Diagnostic validity of the CES-D(Korean version) in the assessment of DSM-III-R major depression, Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, 32, 381
  18. J Lee, 1997, A study of the reliability and the validity of the Korean versions of Social Phobia Scales(K-SAD, K-FNE), The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 16, 251
  19. MR Leary, 1983, A brief version of the fear of negative evaluation scale, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 371, 10.1177/0146167283093007 · DOI · Paper page
  20. LJ Heinberg, 1995, Body image and televised images of thinness and attractiveness: A controlled laboratory investigation, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14, 325, 10.1521/jscp.1995.14.4.325 · DOI
  21. VS Williams, 2010, Psychometric evaluation of a visual analog scale for the assessment of anxiety, Health and quality of life outcomes, 8, 1, 10.1186/1477-7525-8-57 · DOI · Paper page
  22. TM Marteau, 1992, The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31, 301, 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1992.tb00997.x · DOI · Paper page
  23. CD Spielberger, Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory1970
  24. A Pictet, 2016, When less could be more: Investigating the effects of a brief internet-based imagery cognitive bias modification intervention in depression, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 84, 45, 10.1016/j.brat.2016.07.008 · DOI
  25. E Salemink, 2014, Internet-based cognitive bias modification of interpretations in patients with anxiety disorders: a randomised controlled trial, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 45, 186, 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.10.005 · DOI
  26. J-S Lee, 2015, How can we enhance cognitive bias modification techniques? The effects of prospective cognition, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 49, 120, 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.03.007 · DOI
  27. J Yiend, 2014, Modifying interpretation in a clinically depressed sample using ‘cognitive bias modification-errors’: A double blind randomised controlled trial, Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38, 146, 10.1007/s10608-013-9571-y · DOI
  28. SA Steinman, 2010, Modifying interpretations among individuals high in anxiety sensitivity, Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 71, 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.08.008 · DOI
  29. J Joormann, 2015, Cognitive bias modification for interpretation in major depression: Effects on memory and stress reactivity, Clinical Psychological Science, 3, 126, 10.1177/2167702614560748 · DOI
  30. JH Park, 2018, The relationship between rejection sensitivity and depression: Dual mediating effects of negative interpretation bias and negative memory bias, Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 66, 10.15842/kjcp.2018.37.1.006 · DOI
  31. E Salemink, 2010, Interpretation training influences memory for prior interpretations, Emotion, 10, 903, 10.1037/a0020232 · DOI
  32. AK MacLeod, 1996, Anxiety, depression, and the anticipation of future positive and negative experiences, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 286, 10.1037/0021-843X.105.2.286 · DOI · Paper page
  33. AK Macleod, 2005, Well-being and the anticipation of future positive experiences: The role of income, social networks, and planning ability, Cognition and Emotion, 19, 357, 10.1080/02699930441000247 · DOI
  34. RP Mattick, 1998, Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 455
  35. YR Cho, 1997, Cognitive assessment of social anxiety (2): A study on the reliability of the Korean version of Social Interaction Self-Statement Test, Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 16, 233
  36. AD Baddeley, 1974, Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 47
  37. AD Baddeley, 2000, Working memory and the vividness of imagery, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 126, 10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.126 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Park, H. R., & Lee, J.-S.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2023-11-16
Volume
18
Issue
11
Pages
e0289584
ISSN
1932-6203
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0289584
Cited by
5
References
13
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (2018R1C1B5043272)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review