Cited by 106Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Attentional bias away from positive social information mediates the link between social anxiety and anxiety vulnerability to a social stressor

Open access
Taylor, Charles T., Bomyea, Jessica, Amir, Nader·2010·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests that social anxiety is associated with biased processing of positive social information. However, it remains to be determined whether those biases are simply correlates of, or play a role in maintaining social anxiety. The current study examined whether diminished attentional allocation for positive social cues mediates the link between social anxiety and anxiety reactivity to a social-evaluative task. Forty-three undergraduate students ranging in severity of social anxiety symptoms completed a baseline measure of attentional bias for positive social cues (i.e., modified probe detection task) and subsequently delivered an impromptu videotaped speech. Mediation analyses revealed that the tendency to allocate attention away from positive social stimuli mediated the effect of social anxiety on change in state anxiety in response to the stressor. The current findings add to a nascent empirical literature suggesting that aberrant processing of positive social information may contribute to the persistence of excessive social anxiety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.02.004

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor, C. T., Bomyea, J., & Amir, N.
Affiliations
San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
Amir, Nader
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
403-408
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003932709
Cited by
106
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH087623, R34MH077129, R34MH073004)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
social anxiety, attentional bias, state anxiety, social-evaluative stress, speaking anxiety, attention allocation
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Attention, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Phobic Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Social Behavior, Video Recording, Feedback, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review