Cited by 319Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsDigital Mental Health Interventions

A multi-session interpretation modification program: Changes in interpretation and social anxiety symptoms

Open access
Beard, Courtney, Amir, Nader·2008·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Previous research suggests that socially anxious individuals interpret ambiguous social information in a more threatening manner compared to non-anxious individuals. Recently, studies have experimentally modified interpretation and shown that this subsequently affected anxiety in non-anxious individuals. If similar procedures can modify interpretation biases in socially anxious individuals, they may lead to a reduction in social anxiety symptoms. In the current study, we examined the effect of a computerized Interpretation Modification Program (IMP) on interpretation bias and social anxiety symptoms. Twenty-seven socially anxious individuals were randomly assigned to the IMP or a control condition. Participants completed eight computer sessions over four weeks. The IMP modified interpretation by providing positive feedback when participants made benign interpretations and negative feedback in response to threat interpretations. The IMP successfully decreased threat interpretations, increased benign interpretations, and decreased social anxiety symptoms compared to the control condition. Moreover, changes in benign interpretation mediated IMP's effect on social anxiety. This initial trial suggests that interpretation modification may have clinical utility when applied as a multi-session intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2008.05.012

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changing attentional bias by methods such as CBM results in decreased anxiety and depression and increased well-being in clinical populations.

    “Other studies have found that changing attentional bias by methods such as CBM results in decreased anxiety and depression and increased well-being in clinical populations”

    From Mindfulness Training Alters Emotional Memory Recall Compared to Active Controls: Support for an Emotional Information Processing Model of Mindfulness (2012) · cites this paper as Beard and Amir, 2008

    The Results report less social anxiety in the interpretation-modification group than in the control group. But the program targeted interpretation bias, not attentional bias; depression decreased across both groups without a significant treatment-specific effect, and increased well-being was not reported. The Discussion describes the participants as a small analogue sample and says the findings require replication in a clinical sample. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This level of training in either ApBM or IBM is feasible to provide and has been associated with significant improvements in alcohol use and anxiety in extant literature.

    “This level of training in either ApBM or IBM is feasible to provide and has been associated with significant improvements in alcohol use and anxiety in extant literature, respectively (Amir and Taylor, 2012; Beard and Amir, 2008; Beard et al., 2011; Eberl et al., 2013; Eberl et al., 2014).”
  • Reducing interpretation bias resulted in reduced anxiety symptoms and depression levels in prior studies.

    “Results of these particular studies indeed showed that reducing interpretation bias resulted in reduced anxiety symptoms (Beard and Amir 2008) and depression levels (Blackwell and Holmes 2010; Lang et al. 2012).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the Beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1996. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beard, C., & Amir, N.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Beard, Courtney
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-10
Volume
46
Issue
10
Pages
1135-1141
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968038295
Cited by
319
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 16
FWCI
21.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH087623, R34MH077129, R34MH073004)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
social anxiety, interpretation bias, threat interpretation, computer-based intervention, feedback-based training, anxiety symptoms
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Paranoid Behavior, Phobic Disorders, Psychological Tests, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review