Cited by 61Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPhysical Activity and HealthDiabetes Treatment and Management

Muscle strength is a marker of insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pilot study

Open access
NOMURA, Takuo, IKEDA, Yukio, NAKAO, Satoshi, ITO, Kenichi, ISHIDA, Kenji, SUEHIRO, Tadashi, HASHIMOTO, Kozo·2007·Endocrine Journal

Abstract

To examine the effect of muscle strength on insulin resistance, we investigated the association between quantitative lower-extremity muscle strength and insulin resistance index as evaluated by homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR) in patients with type 2 diabetes (20 men and 20 women, mean age SD: 53.3 12.7 years). By simple linear regression analyses, the knee extension force normalized for body weight (%KEF) was found to be significantly correlated with HOMA-IR in both male (r = -0.510, P<0.05) and female patients (r = -0.462, P<0.05). Stepwise regression analysis also showed that %KEF was an independent determinant of HOMA-IR (beta = -0.331, F = 5.400, P<0.005), as was BMI (beta = 0.409, F = 8.260, P<0.05). Our data suggest that lower-extremity muscle strength is independently associated with insulin resistance, which seems to be consistent with previous reports that resistance training improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients. Further studies based on a larger study population will be required to confirm this possibility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1507/endocrj.k07-055

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Insulin resistance is essential for protein anabolism, thus directly concerns muscle fiber atrophy.

    “Studies have elucidated that insulin resistance is essential for protein anabolism, thus directly concerns muscle fiber atrophy (37).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NOMURA, T., IKEDA, Y., NAKAO, S., ITO, K., ISHIDA, K., SUEHIRO, T., & HASHIMOTO, K.
Affiliations
  • Osaka Prefecture University (JP)
  • Kōchi University (JP)
  • University of Kochi (JP)
Venue
Endocrine Journal
Published
2007
Volume
54
Issue
5
Pages
791-796
ISSN
  • 0918-8959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1348-4540
OpenAlex
W1980882824
Cited by
61
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Endocrine Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
muscle strength, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, lower limb muscle strength, knee extension force, HOMA-IR, body mass index, resistance training, glycemic control
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Knee, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review