The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Brand Attachment and Brand Attitude Strength: Conceptual and Empirical Differentiation of Two Critical Brand Equity Drivers
Open accessAbstract
Research has not verified the theoretical or practical value of the brand attachment construct in relation to alternative constructs, particularly brand attitude strength. The authors make conceptual, measurement, and managerial contributions to this research issue. Conceptually, they define brand attachment, articulate its defining properties, and differentiate it from brand attitude strength. From a measurement perspective, they develop and validate a parsimonious measure of brand attachment, test the assumptions that underlie it, and demonstrate that it indicates the concept of attachment. They also demonstrate the convergent and discriminant validity of this measure in relation to brand attitude strength. Managerially, they demonstrate that brand attachment offers value over brand attitude strength in predicting (1) consumers’ intentions to perform difficult behaviors (those they regard as using consumer resources), (2) actual purchase behaviors, (3) brand purchase share (the share of a brand among directly competing brands), and (4) need share (the extent to which consumers rely on a brand to address relevant needs, including those brands in substitutable product categories).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research
Fournier, S. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209515 · Cited by 7,542
Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 · Cited by 5,157
Muniz, A. M., & O'Guinn, T. C. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/319618 · Cited by 3,998
Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209170 · Cited by 3,867
The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength of Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to Brands
Thomson, M., MacInnis, D. J., & Whan Park, C. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_10 · Cited by 2,713 · cited 9×
“Separation distress is regarded as an emotional indicator of attachment (Bowlby 1980; Thomson, MacInnis, and Park 2005).”
InfluentialSelf-citationMikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(03)01002-5 · Cited by 1,485
The Effects of Frequency Knowledge on Consumer Decision Making
Alba, J. W., & Marmorstein, H. (1987) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209089 · Cited by 257 · cited 3×
“First, when thoughts and feelings about the brand are highly accessible, prominence may exert a disproportionately strong influence on decision making (Alba and Marmorstein 1987) and, ultimately, on consumer purchase behavior (Akçura, Gönül, and Petrova 2004).”
Influential
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- Ahuvia Aaron, 2009, The Handbook of Brand Relationships, 342
- 10.1287/mksc.1030.0028 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224378602300406 · DOI · Paper page
- Aron Arthur, 2005, Interpersonal Cognition, 206
- 10.1207/s15327663jcp0102_04 · DOI · Paper page
- Berman William H., 1994, Attachment in Adults: Clinical and Developmental Perspectives, 3
- Bowlby John, 1980, Loss: Sadness and Depression.
- Briñol Pablo, 2009, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 69
- 10.1086/426622 · DOI · Paper page
- Cohen Joel B., 1991, Handbook of Consumer Behavior, 188
- 10.1108/07363760110393001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.810 · DOI · Paper page
- Collins Nancy L., 1994, Advances in Personal Relationships: Attachment Processes in Adulthood, 5, 53
- 10.1037/0022-3514.62.1.62 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.1.62 · Paper page
- 10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_19 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/S15327663JCP1303_14 · DOI · Paper page
- Fazio Russell H., 1995, Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, 247
- Fazio Russell H., 2007, Attitudes: Their Structure, Function, and Consequences.
- 10.1086/209214 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jcps.2008.09.006 · DOI · Paper page
- Fishbein Martin, 1975, Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior.
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.3 · DOI · Paper page
- Hazan Cindy, 1999, Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications, 336
- 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.967 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.967 · Paper page
- Keller Kevin L., 2003, Strategic Brand Management.
- KleineSusan S., and BakerStacey M. (2004), “An Integrative Review of Material Possession Attachment,” Academy of Marketing Science Review, (January 1), (accessed June 15, 2010), [available at http://www.amsreview.org/articles/kleine01-2004.pdf].
- 10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1132 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1132 · Paper page
- 10.1177/002224379102800107 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1209 · DOI · Paper page
- Mikulincer Mario, 2007, Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics and Change.
- 10.1002/cb.202 · DOI
- 10.1086/504122 · DOI
- Park C. Whan, 2006, Seoul National Journal, 12, 3
- Park C. Whan, 2009, Handbook of Brand and Experience Management, 3
- Park C. Whan, 2009, Handbook of Brand Relationships, 327
- 10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.657 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Petty Richard E., 1995, Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, 93
- 10.1002/ejsp.610 · DOI
- 10.1086/380290 · DOI
- 10.1086/209434 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.971 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1509/jmkg.70.3.104 · DOI · Paper page
- Tietje Brian C., 2005, Applying Social Cognition to Consumer-Focused Strategy, 135
- 10.1002/ejsp.608 · DOI
Cited by
Brand authenticity: An integrative framework and measurement scale
Morhart, F., Malär, L., Guèvremont, A., Girardin, F., & Grohmann, B. (2015) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.11.006 · Cited by 1,084
Hollebeek, L. D., & Macky, K. (2019) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2018.07.003 · Cited by 978
Consumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things: An Assemblage Theory Approach
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx105 · Cited by 668
The role of brand love in consumer-brand relationships
Albert, N., & Merunka, D. (2013) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363761311328928 · Cited by 512
The customer value proposition: evolution, development, and application in marketing
Payne, A., Frow, P., & Eggert, A. (2017) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-017-0523-z · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, C. W., Macinnis, D. J., Priester, J., Eisingerich, A. B., & Iacobucci, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1-17
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2096341672
- Cited by
- 2,290
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 140.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brand Attachment and Brand Attitude Strength: Conceptual and Empirical Differentiation of Two Critical Brand Equity Drivers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmkg.74.6.1
- The paper
- Park, C. W., Macinnis, D. J., Priester, J., Eisingerich, A. B., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Brand Attachment and Brand Attitude Strength: Conceptual and Empirical Differentiation of Two Critical Brand Equity Drivers. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.6.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.