The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Likewise, authoritative knowledge emerges through organized critical scrutiny and communal validation rather than expertise alone [22].”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Knowledge acquires legitimacy by passing through institutional processes of review, debate, and revision.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Longino's [22] social epistemology argues that epistemic authority emerges through organized criticism, peer evaluation, and communal scrutiny rather than through expertise alone.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Across the generative pipeline, successive transformations from cultural corpora to datasets, from datasets to base models, and from base models to instruction-tuned systems enact epistemic and normative boundaries that delimit what forms of meaning become legible, what interpretive options are foregrounded, and which traditions of validation remain visible or are displaced [11,17,22].”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Expertise is therefore a necessary but insufficient condition for authority.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“This separation reflects Longino's [22] model of epistemic communities, in which reliability emerges through structured critical interaction.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Longino's [22] model of epistemic communities and Serres's [35] notion of quasi-objects are relevant here: interpretive artefacts circulate within collectives, generating authority through structured participation rather than individual assertion.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Rather than locating legitimacy in model behavior or output quality, the framework situates it in publicly inspectable practices of disclosure, review, and validation that organize how interpretive claims are produced, circulated, and authorized [11,22].”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Because scientific theories, hypotheses, and models are based on human perceptual categories, concepts, and assumptions, bias-free research is not possible [121, 125, 137].”
From The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2025) · cites this paper as [137]
In the citing paper
“Third, during the data-interpretation stage researchers make variousassumptions based on interpretive frameworks, analytical tools, concepts, and background theories (Elliott et al 2016, Longino 1990).”
From Data-Intensive Science and Research Integrity (2017) · cites this paper as Longino 1990
In the citing paper
“However, if an individual possesses too little background knowledge, he or she will not even be able to understand that the anomalous data are anomalous (cf.Lijnse, 1990;Longino, 1990).”
From The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. (1993) · cites this paper as Longino, 1990
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,002
A pragmatic approach to the demarcation problem
Resnik, D. B. (2000) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/s0039-3681(00)00004-2 · Cited by 90
Masking Disagreement among Experts
Beatty, J. (2006) · Episteme · doi:10.1353/epi.0.0001 · Cited by 90
Rafter, N. (2004) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/1362480605048943 · Cited by 90
The Culture of Objectivity: Quantification, Uncertainty, and the Evaluation of Risk at NASA
Feldman, S. P. (2004) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726704044952 · Cited by 89
There are no epistemic norms of inquiry
Thorstad, D. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03896-4 · Cited by 89
Objectivity in Experimental Inquiry: Breaking Data-Technique Circles
Culp, S. (1995) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/289877 · Cited by 89
Rouse, J. (2004) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01272.x · Cited by 88
Evidence-based ethics? On evidence-based practice and the "empirical turn" from normative bioethics
Goldenberg, M. J. (2005) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/1472-6939-6-11 · Cited by 88
Methods for Multispecies Anthropology: Thinking with Salmon Otoliths and Scales
Swanson, H. A. (2017) · Social Analysis · doi:10.3167/sa.2017.610206 · Cited by 100
Discussion Note: Making Sense of Understanding
de Regt, H. W. (2004) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/381415 · Cited by 87
Discrimination and Collaboration in Science
Rubin, H., & O’Connor, C. (2018) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/697744 · Cited by 87
The effect of an informal science intervention on middle school girls’ science affinities
Todd, B., & Zvoch, K. (2018) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1534022 · Cited by 86
Ward, Z. B. (2020) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.09.006 · Cited by 86
Selfish genes vs. selfish people: Sociobiology as origin myth
Brewer, M. B., & Caporael, L. R. (1990) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/bf00996182 · Cited by 89
Janack, M. (1997) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1997.tb00022.x · Cited by 90
How to Beat Science and Influence People: Policy Makers and Propaganda in Epistemic Networks
Weatherall, J. O., O’Connor, C., & Bruner, J. (2018) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axy062 · Cited by 96
Philosophy of psychiatry: theoretical advances and clinical implications
Stein, D. J., Nielsen, K., Hartford, A., Gagné‐Julien, A., Glackin, S. N., Friston, K. J., Maj, M., Zachar, P., & Aftab, A. (2024) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21194 · Cited by 91
Feminism and the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge
Rouse, J. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1742-2_10 · Cited by 83
Knowledge in parliamentary debates
van Dijk, T. A. (2002) · Journal of Language and Politics · doi:10.1075/jlp.2.1.06dij · Cited by 89
Reiss, I. L. (2015) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0634-x · Cited by 82
Where Are the Self-Correcting Mechanisms in Science?
Vazire, S., & Holcombe, A. O. (2022) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1177/10892680211033912 · Cited by 81
Scientific Judgment and the Limits of Conflict-of-Interest Policies
Elliott, K. C. (2008) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989620701783725 · Cited by 82
What ‘biological racial realism’ should mean
Spencer, Q. (2011) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-011-9697-2 · Cited by 81
Direct and Indirect Roles for Values in Science
Elliott, K. C. (2011) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/659222 · Cited by 80
Climate change denial and beliefs about science
Kovaka, K. (2019) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02210-z · Cited by 82
Embeddedness in Practice, Numbers in Context: The Politics of Knowing and Doing
Moss, P. (1995) · The Professional Geographer · doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1995.00442.x · Cited by 81
A Taxonomy of Transparency in Science
Elliott, K. C. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1017/can.2020.21 · Cited by 86
Ex Post Evaluation: A More Effective Role for Scientific Assessments in Environmental Policy
Herrick, C. N., & Sarewitz, D. (2000) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/016224390002500303 · Cited by 79
What Is in It for Me? The Benefits of Diversity in Scientific Communities
Fehr, C. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5_7 · Cited by 78
Participant Reactive Attitudes and Collective Responsibility
Tollefsen, D. P. (2003) · Philosophical Explorations · doi:10.1080/10002003098538751 · Cited by 77
The Impact of Technology on Science Instruction: Historical Trends and Current Opportunities
Linn, M. C. (1998) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_17 · Cited by 77
The place and function of power in community psychology: philosophical and practical issues
Fisher, A. T., Sonn, C. C., & Evans, S. D. (2007) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.934 · Cited by 81
How to choose your research organism
Dietrich, M. R., Ankeny, R. A., Crowe, N., Green, S., & Leonelli, S. (2019) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2019.101227 · Cited by 76
The value of values in climate science
Pulkkinen, K., Undorf, S., Bender, F. A. ‐., Wikman–Svahn, P., Doblas-Reyes, F. J., Flynn, C. M., Hegerl, G. C., Jönsson, A. R., Leung, G.-K., Roussos, J., et al. (2022) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01238-9 · Cited by 76
Upshur, R. E. G., & Colak, E. (2003) · Metamedicine · doi:10.1023/a:1026006801902 · Cited by 78
Solomon, M. (2006) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.23 · Cited by 75
Truth and Objectivity in Perspectivism
Anderson, R. L. (1998) · Synthese · doi:10.1023/a:1004984312166 · Cited by 75
Nakagawa, S. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672547.003.0005 · Cited by 75
The Risk of Using Inductive Risk to Challenge the Value-Free Ideal
de Melo‐Martín, I., & Intemann, K. K. (2016) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/687259 · Cited by 74
Decolonial insights for transforming the higher education curriculum in South Africa
Govender, L., & Naidoo, D. (2023) · Curriculum Perspectives · doi:10.1007/s41297-023-00200-3 · Cited by 83
In Pursuit of Consensus: Disagreement and legitimization during small-group argumentation
Berland, L. K., & Lee, V. R. (2012) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.645086 · Cited by 79
Why Do Irrational Beliefs Mimic Science? The Cultural Evolution of Pseudoscience
Blancke, S., Boudry, M., & Pigliucci, M. (2016) · Theoria · doi:10.1111/theo.12109 · Cited by 80
SAGE advice and political decision-making: ‘Following the science’ in times of epistemic uncertainty
Evans, R. (2021) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/03063127211062586 · Cited by 76
What is (or should be) scientific evidence use in k‐12 classrooms?
McNeill, K. L., & Berland, L. K. (2016) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21381 · Cited by 73
Intuition and expertise: comments on the Benner debate
Paley, J. (1996) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb00035.x · Cited by 73
Revisiting the criticisms of rational choice theories
Herfeld, C. S. (2021) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12774 · Cited by 85
Postmodernism, Marxism, and the Critique of Modern Economic Thought
Amariglio, J. L., & Ruccio, D. F. (1994) · Rethinking Marxism · doi:10.1080/08935699408658108 · Cited by 72
Policy studies within a feminist frame
Hawkesworth, M. (1994) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf00999883 · Cited by 72
How Values in Scientific Discovery and Pursuit Alter Theory Appraisal
Elliott, K. C., & McKaughan, D. J. (2009) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/605807 · Cited by 72
Theory and Contrastive Explanation in Ethnography
Lichterman, P., & Reed, I. A. (2015) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124114554458 · Cited by 71
The Epistemic Aims of Education
Robertson, E. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195312881.003.0002 · Cited by 73
Principal Elements of Nature of Science: Informing Science Teaching while Dispelling the Myths
McComas, W. F. (2020) · Science: Philosophy, history and education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57239-6_3 · Cited by 71
Science education for democratic citizenship through the use of the history of science
Kolstø, S. D. (2007) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9084-8 · Cited by 71
Niebert, K., & Gropengießer, H. (2013) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.763298 · Cited by 71
Meghani, Z., & Kuzma, J. (2010) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-010-9287-x · Cited by 70
On Predicting Recidivism: Epistemic Risk, Tradeoffs, and Values in Machine Learning
Biddle, J. B. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1017/can.2020.27 · Cited by 71
Follow *the* science? On the marginal role of the social sciences in the COVID-19 pandemic
Lohse, S., & Canali, S. (2021) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-021-00416-y · Cited by 70
The Grounds of Political Legitimacy
Peter, F. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198872382.001.0001 · Cited by 70
Explanation and the Nature of Scientific Knowledge
McCain, K. (2015) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-015-9775-5 · Cited by 70
From the Horse's Mouth: Why scientists’ views are crucial to nature of science understanding
Hodson, D., & Wong, S. L. (2014) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.927936 · Cited by 70
Bianchini, J. A., Johnston, C. C., Oram, S. Y., & Cavazos, L. M. (2003) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.10058 · Cited by 73
Exploring Expertise: Issues and Perspectives
Faulkner, W., Fleck, J., & Williams, R. (1998) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-13693-3_1 · Cited by 71
Crowdsourced science: sociotechnical epistemology in the e-research paradigm
Watson, D., & Floridi, L. (2016) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1238-2 · Cited by 75
Social Aspects of Argumentation
Kolstø, S. D., & Ratcliffe, M. (2007) · Science & technology education library · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_6 · Cited by 69
Feminist philosophy of science: history, contributions, and challenges
Richardson, S. S. (2010) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9791-6 · Cited by 69
How Can Significance Tests Be Deinstitutionalized?
Orlitzky, M. (2011) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428111428356 · Cited by 72
Can we trust Big Data? Applying philosophy of science to software
Symons, J., & Alvarado, R. (2016) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951716664747 · Cited by 77
Wendel, C., Klasen, S., Meyer, M., Ritter, M., Zachmann, K., Lang, C., Corcoran, M. G., Lucht, P., Bauer, S., & Saupe, A. (2003) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-80485-3_5 · Cited by 69
Rolin, K. H. (2002) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb01075.x · Cited by 68
Social construction as grounding; or: fundamentality for feminists, a reply to Barnes and Mikkola
Schaffer, J. (2016) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-016-0738-8 · Cited by 74
Smith, D. C. (2000) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1023/a:1009471630989 · Cited by 68
Jiménez‐Aleixandre, M. P. (2012) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-012-9561-6 · Cited by 68
Public engagement on solar radiation management and why it needs to happen now
Carr, W., Preston, C. J., Yung, L., Szerszynski, B., Keith, D. W., & Mercer, A. (2013) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0763-y · Cited by 68
John Rawls and the Political Coercion of Unreasonable People
Friedman, M. (2003) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0195138503.003.0008 · Cited by 68
Gendered Reason: Sex Metaphor and Conceptions of Reason
Rooney, P. (1991) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb01394.x · Cited by 68
Appropriating scientific practices and discourses with future elementary teachers
Smith, D. C., & Anderson, C. (1999) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199909)36:7 · Cited by 68
Social Biases and Solutions for Procedural Objectivity
Lee, C. J., & Schunn, C. D. (2011) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01178.x · Cited by 67
Conceptual Change in Science and in the Learning of Science
Duschl, R. A., & Hamilton, R. J. (1998) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_61 · Cited by 67
Autonomy, Social Disruption, and Women
Friedman, M. (2003) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0195138503.003.0005 · Cited by 67
Kelly, G. J., Brown, C., & Crawford, T. (2000) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/1098-237x(200009)84:5 · Cited by 67
Objectivity and a comparison of methodological scenario approaches for climate change research
Lloyd, E. A., & Schweizer, V. J. (2013) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-013-0353-6 · Cited by 74
Validating test score meaning and defending test score use: different aims, different methods
Cizek, G. J. (2015) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2015.1063479 · Cited by 66
Science communication with generative AI
Alvarez, A., Caliskan, A., Crockett, M. J., Ho, S. S., Messeri, L. R., & West, J. D. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-01846-3 · Cited by 65
Bianchini, J. A., Cavazos, L. M., & Helms, J. V. (2000) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6 · Cited by 65
Nunes, J. A. (2008) · Revista crítica de ciências sociais/Revista crítica de ciências sociais · doi:10.4000/rccs.693 · Cited by 64
The Unity of the Epistemic Virtues
Goldman, A. I. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0195138791.003.0003 · Cited by 64
Socially relevant philosophy of science: an introduction
Fehr, C., & Plaisance, K. S. (2010) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9855-7 · Cited by 64
Dynamics and Diversity in Epistemic Communities
O’Connor, C., & Bruner, J. (2017) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-017-9950-y · Cited by 63
Where Are the Missing Coauthors? Authorship Practices in Participatory Research
Sarna‐Wojcicki, D., Perret, M., Eitzel, M. V., & Fortmann, L. P. (2017) · Rural Sociology · doi:10.1111/ruso.12156 · Cited by 63
Contessa, G. (2022) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-021-00485-8 · Cited by 68
Can Advances in Science and Technology Prevent Global Warming?
Huesemann, M. H. (2006) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-006-2166-0 · Cited by 63
Political philosophy of science in logical empiricism: the left Vienna Circle
Uebel, T. (2005) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2005.08.014 · Cited by 63
Invisible Hands and the Success of Science
Wray, K. B. (2000) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/392767 · Cited by 63
TRUSTWORTHINESS AND TRUTH: THE EPISTEMIC PITFALLS OF INTERNET ACCOUNTABILITY
Frost‐Arnold, K. (2013) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2013.43 · Cited by 62
Extra-academic transdisciplinarity and scientific pluralism: what might they learn from one another?
Koskinen, I., & Mäki, U. (2016) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-016-0141-5 · Cited by 62
Philosophy for Children and its Critics: A Mendham Dialogue
Gregory, M. R. (2011) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2011.00795.x · Cited by 62
Balancing Scientific and Community Interests in Community-Based Participatory Research
Resnik, D. B., & Kennedy, C. E. (2010) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2010.493095 · Cited by 62
Viewing Classrooms as Cultural Contexts for Fostering Scientific Literacy
Hogan, K., & Corey, C. (2001) · Anthropology & Education Quarterly · doi:10.1525/aeq.2001.32.2.214 · Cited by 63
Chua, W. F. (2019) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria-52377 · Cited by 62
Redford, K. H., Brooks, T. M., MacFarlane, N., & Adams, J. S. (2019) · doi:10.2305/iucn.ch.2019.05.en · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Longino, H. E.
- Corresponding author
- Longino, Helen E.
- ORCID
- Longino, Helen E.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 1990-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4300559119
- Cited by
- 3,092
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 244 · 2025: 296 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 169 · 2022: 212 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 145 · 2019: 173 · 2018: 128 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 100 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 80 · 2012: 58
- FWCI
- 81.08
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education, Politics, and Culture Studies
- Keywords
- philosophy of science, sociology of science, scientific knowledge, epistemology of science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
