The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Likewise, authoritative knowledge emerges through organized critical scrutiny and communal validation rather than expertise alone [22].”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Knowledge acquires legitimacy by passing through institutional processes of review, debate, and revision.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Longino's [22] social epistemology argues that epistemic authority emerges through organized criticism, peer evaluation, and communal scrutiny rather than through expertise alone.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Across the generative pipeline, successive transformations from cultural corpora to datasets, from datasets to base models, and from base models to instruction-tuned systems enact epistemic and normative boundaries that delimit what forms of meaning become legible, what interpretive options are foregrounded, and which traditions of validation remain visible or are displaced [11,17,22].”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Expertise is therefore a necessary but insufficient condition for authority.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“This separation reflects Longino's [22] model of epistemic communities, in which reliability emerges through structured critical interaction.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Longino's [22] model of epistemic communities and Serres's [35] notion of quasi-objects are relevant here: interpretive artefacts circulate within collectives, generating authority through structured participation rather than individual assertion.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Rather than locating legitimacy in model behavior or output quality, the framework situates it in publicly inspectable practices of disclosure, review, and validation that organize how interpretive claims are produced, circulated, and authorized [11,22].”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Because scientific theories, hypotheses, and models are based on human perceptual categories, concepts, and assumptions, bias-free research is not possible [121, 125, 137].”
From The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2025) · cites this paper as [137]
In the citing paper
“Third, during the data-interpretation stage researchers make variousassumptions based on interpretive frameworks, analytical tools, concepts, and background theories (Elliott et al 2016, Longino 1990).”
From Data-Intensive Science and Research Integrity (2017) · cites this paper as Longino 1990
In the citing paper
“However, if an individual possesses too little background knowledge, he or she will not even be able to understand that the anomalous data are anomalous (cf.Lijnse, 1990;Longino, 1990).”
From The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. (1993) · cites this paper as Longino, 1990
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,002
Public epistemic trustworthiness and the integration of patients in psychiatric classification
Bueter, A. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-01913-z · Cited by 34
Duwell, A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009104975 · Cited by 35
Grundlagen der Wissenschaftstheorie und Wissenschaftsforschung
Bauer, R. (2007) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-90091-9_12 · Cited by 34
Points East and West: Acupuncture and Comparative Philosophy of Science
Allchin, D. (1996) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/289942 · Cited by 34
Technology and Epistemic Possibility
Record, I. (2013) · Journal for General Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s10838-013-9230-8 · Cited by 34
Beyond Advocacy: Making Space for Conservation Scientists in Public Debate
Garrard, G. E., Fidler, F. M., Wintle, B. C., Chee, Y. E., & Bekessy, S. A. (2015) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12193 · Cited by 34
Social values influence the adequacy conditions of scientific theories: beyond inductive risk
Brigandt, I. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00455091.2015.1079004 · Cited by 34
Objectivity versus narrative coherence: science, environmental policy, and the U.S. Data Quality Act
Herrick, C. N. (2004) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.003 · Cited by 34
„Feministische Naturwissenschaftsforschung — was soll das denn sein?“
Palm, K. (1999) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-322-93346-1_6 · Cited by 33
Biodiversity at Twenty-Five Years: Revolution Or Red Herring?
Morar, N., Toadvine, T., & Bohannan, B. J. M. (2015) · Ethics Policy & Environment · doi:10.1080/21550085.2015.1018380 · Cited by 33
Citizen Science and Scientific Objectivity: Mapping Out Epistemic Risks and Benefits
Bedessem, B., & Ruphy, S. (2020) · Perspectives on Science · doi:10.1162/posc_a_00353 · Cited by 33
Interdisciplinarity can aid the spread of better methods between scientific communities
Smaldino, P. E., & O’Connor, C. (2022) · Collective Intelligence · doi:10.1177/26339137221131816 · Cited by 35
Gender and physics: feminist philosophy and science education
Rolin, K. H. (2006) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9065-3 · Cited by 33
‘The other woman’ and the question of equal opportunity in Australian organizations
Syed, J. (2007) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585190701638184 · Cited by 36
Through the Fractured Looking Glass
Mitchell, S. D. (2020) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/710787 · Cited by 32
Zheng, R. (2022) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12815 · Cited by 35
Values, standpoints, and scientific/intellectual movements
Rolin, K. H. (2015) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.10.008 · Cited by 32
García–Carmona, A., & Acevedo-Díaz, J. A. (2017) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-017-9876-4 · Cited by 32
“Antiscience Zealotry”? Values, Epistemic Risk, and the GMO Debate
Biddle, J. B. (2018) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/697749 · Cited by 32
Institutional Voids and the Philanthropization of CSR Practices: Insights from Developing Economies
Ahen, F., & Amankwah‐Amoah, J. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10072400 · Cited by 34
Falsificationist Treatment of Auxiliary Hypotheses in Social and Behavioral Sciences
Tunç, D. U., & Tunç, M. N. (2023) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2021.2756 · Cited by 32
Social Construction Revisited: Epistemology and Scientific Practice
Fagan, M. B. (2010) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/650210 · Cited by 36
Science, Values, and the Value of Science
Koertge, N. (2000) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/392808 · Cited by 32
How can Feminist Theories of Evidence Assist Clinical Reasoning and Decision-making?
Goldenberg, M. J. (2013) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2013.794871 · Cited by 32
Schienke, E. W., Tuana, N., Brown, D. A., Davis, K. J., Keller, K. M., Shortle, J. S., Stickler, M., & Baum, S. D. (2009) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691720903364282 · Cited by 32
A New Program for Philosophy of Science?
Giere, R. N. (2003) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/367865 · Cited by 32
From practice to research: The case for criticism in an age of evidence
Berkwits, M. (1998) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00232-9 · Cited by 32
Diversity and Dissent in the Social Sciences
Rolin, K. H. (2010) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/0048393110381212 · Cited by 31
Reconsidering nutrition science: critical reflection with a cultural lens
Hassel, C. A. (2014) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2891-13-42 · Cited by 31
The Gender of Biomedical Data: Challenges for Personalised and Precision Medicine
Pot, M., Spahl, W., & Prainsack, B. (2019) · Somatechnics · doi:10.3366/soma.2019.0278 · Cited by 32
Thorstad, D. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198886143.001.0001 · Cited by 36
From situated knowledges to situated modelling: a relational framework for simulation modelling
Klein, A., Unverzagt, K., Alba, R., Donges, J. F., Hertz, T., Krueger, T., Lindkvist, E., Martin, R., Niewöhner, J., Prawitz, H., et al. (2024) · Ecosystems and People · doi:10.1080/26395916.2024.2361706 · Cited by 40
Altogether Now: A Virtue-Theoretic Approach to Pluralism in Feminist Epistemology
Daukas, N. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5_3 · Cited by 32
Non-epistemic values and scientific assessment: an adequacy-for-purpose view
Lusk, G., & Elliott, K. C. (2022) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-022-00458-w · Cited by 31
Objectivity in feminist epistemology
Toole, B. (2022) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12885 · Cited by 35
Amending and defending Critical Contextual Empiricism
Borgerson, K. (2011) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-011-0035-5 · Cited by 31
Team Science, Justice, and the Co‐Production of Knowledge
Tebes, J. K. (2018) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/ajcp.12252 · Cited by 33
The Error Is in the Gap: Synthesizing Accounts for Societal Values in Science
ChoGlueck, C. (2018) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/699191 · Cited by 31
L’éthique de la recherche entre réglementation et réflexivité
Carvallo, S. (2019) · Revue d anthropologie des connaissances · doi:10.3917/rac.043.0299 · Cited by 40
Developing a Graduate Level Science Education Course on the Nature of Science
Eichinger, D. C., Abell, S. K., & Dagher, Z. R. (1997) · Science & Education · doi:10.1023/a:1008673508960 · Cited by 31
New Philosophies of Science in North America – Twenty Years Later
Rouse, J. (1998) · Journal for General Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1023/a:1008259514953 · Cited by 31
Ideology, history and changing models of liver cirrhosis epidemiology
Herd, D. A. (1992) · British Journal of Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1992.tb01998.x · Cited by 31
Beebe, J. R., Baghramian, M., Drury, L. O., & Dellsén, F. (2018) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2018.1504099 · Cited by 32
Pullum, G. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316779651.006 · Cited by 30
The new self-advocacy activism in psychiatry: Toward a scientific turn
Arnaud, S., & Gagné‐Julien, A. (2023) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2023.2174425 · Cited by 35
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback in LLMs: Whose Culture, Whose Values, Whose Perspectives?
Barman, K. G., Lohse, S., & de Regt, H. W. (2025) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-025-00861-0 · Cited by 43
Psychopathy and the Evolution of Criminological Knowledge
Rafter, N. (1997) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/1362480697001002004 · Cited by 30
Probes, Surveys, and the Ontology of the Social
Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2015) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689815619825 · Cited by 35
Methods in epidemiology and public health: does practice match theory?
Weed, D. L. (2001) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.55.2.104 · Cited by 30
Connecting Inquiry and Values in Science Education
Lee, E. A., & Brown, M. J. (2018) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-017-9952-9 · Cited by 30
Objective data sets in qualitative research
Zahle, J. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02630-2 · Cited by 30
Framing conservation: ‘biodiversity’ and the values embedded in scientific language
Elliott, K. C. (2020) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892920000302 · Cited by 33
Fantl, J. (2021) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2021.1946201 · Cited by 30
Gläser, J., Ash, M. G., Buenstorf, G., Hopf, D., Hubenschmid, L., Janßen, M., Laudel, G., Schimank, U., Stoll, M., Wilholt, T., et al. (2021) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-021-09451-8 · Cited by 35
Sex and gender in sport categorization: aiming for terminological clarity
Martínková, I., Knox, T. R., Anderson, L. C., & Parry, J. (2022) · Journal of the Philosophy of Sport · doi:10.1080/00948705.2022.2043755 · Cited by 30
Public engagement and argumentation in science
Ivani, S., & Novaes, C. D. (2022) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-022-00480-y · Cited by 30
The Integrity of Narratives: Deliberative Practice, Pluralism, and Multivocality
Wylie, A. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-71825-5_14 · Cited by 30
Feminist methodologies and engineering education research
Beddoes, K. (2012) · European Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/03043797.2012.748015 · Cited by 30
Mapping a Future: Archaeology, Feminism, and Scientific Practice
Tomášková, S. (2007) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-007-9038-0 · Cited by 30
Douglas, H. (2017) · The Western Ontario series in philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52768-0_6 · Cited by 30
BOUWEL, J. V., & Oudheusden, M. V. (2017) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2017.1352624 · Cited by 30
Méndez, M. D. M. A., Acevedo-Díaz, J. A., & García–Carmona, A. (2018) · Cultural Studies of Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11422-018-9868-y · Cited by 30
Epistemic Presuppositions and their Consequences
Eflin, J. (2003) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/1467-9973.00259 · Cited by 30
Gender and Archaeological Knowledge
Hanen, M. P., & Kelley, J. H. (1992) · Boston studies in the philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1826-2_8 · Cited by 30
Hoffman, G. A., & Bluhm, R. L. (2016) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12357 · Cited by 29
The many theories of mind: eliminativism and pluralism in context
Gough, J. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03804-w · Cited by 29
The costs of competition in distributing scarce research funds
Schweiger, G., Barnett, A. G., van den Besselaar, P., Bornmann, L., BLOCK, A. D., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Sandström, U., & Conix, S. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2407644121 · Cited by 29
Räume des Wissens ‐ was und wo sind sie? Einleitung in das Thema
Ash, M. G. (2000) · Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte · doi:10.1002/bewi.20000230302 · Cited by 29
Implicit bias, ideological bias, and epistemic risks in philosophy
Peters, U. (2018) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12194 · Cited by 32
Sex, Drugs, and How to Deal with Criticism: The Case of Flibanserin
Bueter, A., & Jukola, S. (2020) · Boston studies in the philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-29179-2_20 · Cited by 30
What Does Good Science-Based Advice to Politics Look Like?
CARRIER, M. J. (2021) · Journal for General Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s10838-021-09574-2 · Cited by 29
OECD (2019) · Programme for international student assessment/Internationale Schulleistungsstudie · doi:10.1787/5c07e4f1-en · Cited by 37
PISA for Development Science Framework
OECD (2018) · Programme for international student assessment/Internationale Schulleistungsstudie · doi:10.1787/9789264305274-6-en · Cited by 29
The Problem of Pseudoscience in Science Education and Implications of Constructivist Pedagogy
Muğaloğlu, E. Z. (2013) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-013-9670-x · Cited by 29
The quality of evidence in knowledge management research: practitioner versus scholarly literature
Ekbia, H. R., & Hara, N. (2007) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551507080412 · Cited by 29
Elliott, K. C. (2009) · Ethics Place & Environment · doi:10.1080/13668790902863382 · Cited by 29
On the Nature and Role of Peer Review in Mathematics
Andersen, L. E. (2016) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2016.1274885 · Cited by 29
Communicating Uncertainty to Policymakers: The Ineliminable Role of Values
Winsberg, E. B. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-65058-6_13 · Cited by 28
Public administration with , of , and through AI: toward a new paradigm in the era of intelligence
Zhu, X. (2025) · Journal of Chinese Governance · doi:10.1080/23812346.2025.2578589 · Cited by 32
Diagnostic frameworks and nursing diagnoses: a normative stance
Zanotti, R., & Chiffi, D. (2014) · Nursing Philosophy · doi:10.1111/nup.12074 · Cited by 28
Efstathiou, S. (2012) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/667901 · Cited by 30
Allchin, D., & Werth, A. J. (2016) · Journal for General Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s10838-016-9336-x · Cited by 28
Science and Values in Undergraduate Education
Koster, E., & de Regt, H. W. (2019) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-019-00093-7 · Cited by 28
Building knowledge by mapping model uncertainty in six studies of social and financial performance
Berchicci, L., & King, A. A. (2021) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3374 · Cited by 28
Values in Psychological Science
Osbeck, L. M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316471302 · Cited by 28
Du sujet collectif au sujet individuel, et retour
Cervulle, M., & Testenoire, A. (2012) · Cahiers du Genre · doi:10.3917/cdge.053.0005 · Cited by 28
Park, H., Nielsen, W., & Woodruff, E. (2013) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-013-9613-6 · Cited by 28
Human values and the value of humanities in interdisciplinary research
Robinson, B., Vasko, S. E., Gonnerman, C., Christen, M., O’Rourke, M. J. E., & Steel, D. P. (2016) · Cogent Arts and Humanities · doi:10.1080/23311983.2015.1123080 · Cited by 28
Steel, D. P., Gonnerman, C., & O’Rourke, M. J. E. (2017) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.04.002 · Cited by 28
Exploring Girls’ Science Affinities Through an Informal Science Education Program
Todd, B., & Zvoch, K. (2017) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-017-9670-y · Cited by 28
Małecka, M. (2019) · Journal of Economic Methodology · doi:10.1080/1350178x.2019.1640891 · Cited by 31
Bengson, J., Cuneo, T. D., & Shafer‐Landau, R. (2019) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12291 · Cited by 27
For values in science: Assessing recent arguments for the ideal of value-free science
Brown, M. J. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04762-1 · Cited by 33
Social Origins of Scientific Deviance: Examining Creationism and Global Warming Skepticism
Tom, J. C. (2017) · Sociological Perspectives · doi:10.1177/0731121417710459 · Cited by 27
Social aspects of scientific knowledge
Niiniluoto, I. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1868-7 · Cited by 27
Emotions and Distrust in Science
Furman, K. (2020) · International Journal of Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1080/09672559.2020.1846281 · Cited by 27
Why has personality psychology played an outsized role in the credibility revolution?
Atherton, O. E., Chung, J. M., Harris, K., Rohrer, J. M., Condon, D. M., Cheung, F., Vazire, S., Lucas, R. E., Donnellan, M. B., Mroczek, D. K., et al. (2021) · Personality Science · doi:10.5964/ps.6001 · Cited by 27
Scientific Models and Decision Making
Winsberg, E. B., & Harvard, S. S. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009029346 · Cited by 27
The “how” and “whys” of research: life scientists’ views of accountability
Ladd, J. M., Lappé, M., McCormick, J. B., Boyce, A. M., & Cho, M. K. (2009) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme.2009.031781 · Cited by 27
Barber, K., & Haney, T. J. (2015) · Sociological Spectrum · doi:10.1080/02732173.2015.1086287 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Longino, H. E.
- Corresponding author
- Longino, Helen E.
- ORCID
- Longino, Helen E.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 1990-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4300559119
- Cited by
- 3,092
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 244 · 2025: 296 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 169 · 2022: 212 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 145 · 2019: 173 · 2018: 128 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 100 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 80 · 2012: 58
- FWCI
- 81.08
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education, Politics, and Culture Studies
- Keywords
- philosophy of science, sociology of science, scientific knowledge, epistemology of science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
