The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Likewise, authoritative knowledge emerges through organized critical scrutiny and communal validation rather than expertise alone [22].”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Knowledge acquires legitimacy by passing through institutional processes of review, debate, and revision.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Longino's [22] social epistemology argues that epistemic authority emerges through organized criticism, peer evaluation, and communal scrutiny rather than through expertise alone.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Across the generative pipeline, successive transformations from cultural corpora to datasets, from datasets to base models, and from base models to instruction-tuned systems enact epistemic and normative boundaries that delimit what forms of meaning become legible, what interpretive options are foregrounded, and which traditions of validation remain visible or are displaced [11,17,22].”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Expertise is therefore a necessary but insufficient condition for authority.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“This separation reflects Longino's [22] model of epistemic communities, in which reliability emerges through structured critical interaction.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Longino's [22] model of epistemic communities and Serres's [35] notion of quasi-objects are relevant here: interpretive artefacts circulate within collectives, generating authority through structured participation rather than individual assertion.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Rather than locating legitimacy in model behavior or output quality, the framework situates it in publicly inspectable practices of disclosure, review, and validation that organize how interpretive claims are produced, circulated, and authorized [11,22].”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Because scientific theories, hypotheses, and models are based on human perceptual categories, concepts, and assumptions, bias-free research is not possible [121, 125, 137].”
From The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2025) · cites this paper as [137]
In the citing paper
“Third, during the data-interpretation stage researchers make variousassumptions based on interpretive frameworks, analytical tools, concepts, and background theories (Elliott et al 2016, Longino 1990).”
From Data-Intensive Science and Research Integrity (2017) · cites this paper as Longino 1990
In the citing paper
“However, if an individual possesses too little background knowledge, he or she will not even be able to understand that the anomalous data are anomalous (cf.Lijnse, 1990;Longino, 1990).”
From The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. (1993) · cites this paper as Longino, 1990
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,002
Wilcox, M. (2010) · American Antiquity · doi:10.7183/0002-7316.75.2.221 · Cited by 46
Values in Science and in Science Education
Allchin, D. (1998) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_63 · Cited by 44
Multiple diversity concepts and their ethical-epistemic implications
Steel, D. P., Fazelpour, S., Gillette, K., Crewe, B., & Burgess, M. (2018) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-018-0209-5 · Cited by 44
Schweizer, V. J. (2020) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-019-02615-2 · Cited by 50
Getting Serious About Priorities in Science Education1
Atkin, J. M., & Helms, J. V. (1993) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057269308560012 · Cited by 44
Imposters, Tricksters, and Trustworthiness as an Epistemic Virtue
Frost‐Arnold, K. (2014) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12107 · Cited by 43
Value pluralism in research integrity
Peels, R., de Ridder, J., Haven, T. L., & Bouter, L. M. (2019) · Research Integrity and Peer Review · doi:10.1186/s41073-019-0076-4 · Cited by 46
Learning Progressions To Support Ambitious Teaching Practices
Furtak, E. M., Thompson, J. J., Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2012) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-824-7_17 · Cited by 43
Abi‐El‐Mona, I., & Abd‐El‐Khalick, F. (2010) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500691003677889 · Cited by 48
Secondary School Students’ Understanding of Science and Their Socioscientific Reasoning
Karahan, E., & Roehrig, G. (2016) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9527-9 · Cited by 43
Value of cognitive diversity in science
Reijula, S. (2016) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1147-4 · Cited by 43
The conundrum of agenda‐driven science in conservation
Peery, M. Z., Jones, G. M., Gutiérrez, R., Redpath, S. M., Franklin, A. B., Simberloff, D., Turner, M. G., Radeloff, V. C., & White, G. C. (2019) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.2006 · Cited by 43
Science Communication with the Public: A Cross-Cultural Event
Aikenhead, G. S. (2001) · Contemporary trends and issues in science education · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0620-0_2 · Cited by 43
LOST WANDERERS IN THE FOREST OF KNOWLEDGE: SOME THOUGHTS ON THE DISCOVERY-JUSTIFICATION DISTINCTION
Howard, D. A. (2006) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-4251-5_2 · Cited by 43
Coming to Terms with the Values of Science: Insights from Feminist Science Studies Scholarship
Wylie, A., & Nelson, L. H. (2007) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195308969.003.0005 · Cited by 43
Bassett, K. (1999) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1191/030913299669363669 · Cited by 43
Abstract argumentation and explanation applied to scientific debates
Šešelja, D., & Straßer, C. (2011) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-011-9964-y · Cited by 43
SITUATING FEMINIST EPISTEMOLOGY
Ashton, N. A., & McKenna, R. (2018) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2018.11 · Cited by 42
How to balance Balanced Reporting and Reliable Reporting
Gerken, M. (2019) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-019-01362-5 · Cited by 46
Teachers’ Ways of Talking About Nature of Science and Its Teaching
Leden, L., Hansson, L., Redfors, A., & Ideland, M. (2015) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-015-9782-6 · Cited by 42
Holman, B. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1642-2 · Cited by 42
Paleoaesthetics and the Practice of Paleontology
Turner, D. D. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108671996 · Cited by 1
Alzheimer's disease and senile dementia, 1885–1920: An interpretive history of disease negotiation
Holstein, M. (1997) · Journal of Aging Studies · doi:10.1016/s0890-4065(97)90008-6 · Cited by 42
Social epistemology and information science
Fallis, D. (2006) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.1440400119 · Cited by 42
Les sciences et la construction des identités sexuées. Une revue critique
Gardey, D. (2006) · Annales Histoire Sciences Sociales · doi:10.1017/s0395264900003218 · Cited by 50
Towards a philosophy of public health.
Weed, D. L. (1999) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.53.2.99 · Cited by 42
An ethics of expertise based on informed consent
Elliott, K. C. (2006) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-006-0062-3 · Cited by 41
Virtues and vices in scientific practice
Paternotte, C., & Ivanova, M. (2016) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1023-2 · Cited by 41
Well-ordered science and public trust in science
Irzık, G., & Kurtulmuş, F. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-02022-7 · Cited by 41
John, S. D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009063647 · Cited by 41
Probability Values and Human Values in Evaluating Single-Sex Education
Liben, L. S. (2015) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0438-9 · Cited by 46
Connected Knowledge in Science and Mathematics Education
Zohar, A. E. (2006) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690500439199 · Cited by 41
Better Red than Dead—Putting an End to the Social Irrelevance of Postwar Philosophy of Science
Howard, D. A. (2007) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9117-3 · Cited by 41
LACEY, H. M. (2014) · Foundations of Science · doi:10.1007/s10699-014-9376-9 · Cited by 44
Scientism and Scientific Thinking
Gasparatou, R. (2017) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-017-9931-1 · Cited by 41
The Virtues of Feminist Empiricism
Campbell, R. (1994) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1994.tb00111.x · Cited by 41
Roles and Responsibilities of Epidemiologists
Weed, D. L., & Mink, P. J. (2002) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00302-7 · Cited by 41
The social construction of acid rain
Herrick, C. N., & Jamieson, D. W. (1995) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/0959-3780(95)00016-h · Cited by 41
Pathways of influence: understanding the impact of philosophy of science in scientific domains
Plaisance, K. S., Michaud, J., & McLevey, J. (2021) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-03007-1 · Cited by 40
Rice, C. C. (2019) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02331-5 · Cited by 40
Kitcher, P. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197657249.001.0001 · Cited by 40
Intellectual courage and inquisitive reasons
Fleisher, W. (2023) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-023-01932-8 · Cited by 40
Zhao, H. H., DiMarco, M., Ichikawa, K., Boulicault, M., Perret, M., Jillson, K., Fair, A., DeJesus, K., & Richardson, S. S. (2023) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/03063127231168371 · Cited by 42
Decolonizing Science: Undoing the Colonial and Racist Hegemony of Western Science
Held, M. B. E. (2023) · Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation · doi:10.56645/jmde.v19i44.785 · Cited by 40
Tsou, J. Y. (2015) · History, philosophy and theory of the life sciences · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9765-8_3 · Cited by 40
From behind the curtain: talking about values in LCA
Freidberg, S. (2015) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-015-0879-6 · Cited by 46
Value Ladenness and the Value-Free Ideal in Scientific Research
González, W. J. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1494-6_78 · Cited by 40
Which Scientific Knowledge is a Common Good?
Radder, H. (2017) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2017.1353656 · Cited by 40
Feminist philosophy of science: ‘standpoint’ and knowledge
Crasnow, S. L. (2006) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9069-z · Cited by 46
Technology's promises and dangers in a psychological and educational context
Salomon, G. (1998) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405849809543780 · Cited by 43
Copyright and Commerce: The DMCA, Trusted Systems, and the Stabilization of Distribution
Gillespie, T. (2004) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972240490480938 · Cited by 40
Hannon, M., & Edenberg, E. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780195396577-0408 · Cited by 40
The history of natural history and race: Decolonizing human dimensions of ecology
Miriti, M. N., Rawson, A. J., & Mansfield, B. (2022) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2748 · Cited by 44
Engendering the sociology of expertise
Azócar, M. J., & Ferree, M. M. (2016) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12438 · Cited by 43
The history and impact of women in animal behaviour and the ABS: a North American perspective
Tang‐Martínez, Z. (2020) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.12.011 · Cited by 39
The Epistemic Value of Diversity
Robertson, E. (2013) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12026 · Cited by 40
Data-Intensive Science and Research Integrity
Resnik, D. B., Elliott, K. C., Soranno, P. A., & Smith, E. M. (2017) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2017.1327813 · Cited by 38
Rethinking deliberative democracy: From deliberative discourse to transformative dialogue
Healy, P. (2011) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/0191453710389439 · Cited by 38
Lawson, T. (2007) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511619205.008 · Cited by 39
Community Engagement and Field Trials of Genetically Modified Insects and Animals
Neuhaus, C. P. (2018) · The Hastings Center Report · doi:10.1002/hast.808 · Cited by 38
Menking, A., & Rosenberg, J. (2020) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243920924783 · Cited by 38
Why Science cannot be Value-Free
Lekka-Kowalik, A. (2009) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-009-9128-3 · Cited by 38
Intrinsic Ethics Regarding Integrated Assessment Models for Climate Management
Schienke, E. W., Baum, S. D., Tuana, N., Davis, K. J., & Keller, K. M. (2010) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9209-3 · Cited by 38
Dismantling the Self/Other Dichotomy in Science: Towards a Feminist Model of the Immune System
Weasel, L. H. (2001) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2001.tb01047.x · Cited by 41
Homing in on excellence: Dimensions of appraisal in Center of Excellence program evaluations
Hellström, T. (2011) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1356389011400891 · Cited by 38
Value-Free or Valueless? Notes on the Pursuit of Detachment in Economics
Nelson, J. A. (1993) · History of Political Economy · doi:10.1215/00182702-25-1-121 · Cited by 38
Knowledge paradigms in occupational science: Pluralistic perspectives
Kinsella, E. A. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118281581.ch6 · Cited by 39
What Is Social Epistemology? a Smorgasbord of Projects
Goldman, A. I. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0195138791.003.0009 · Cited by 37
Philipps, L. C. (1996) · Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société · doi:10.1017/s0829320100004622 · Cited by 37
In favour of a Millian proposal to reform biomedical research
Reiss, J. (2010) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9790-7 · Cited by 37
Cenci, A., & Cawthorne, D. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00223-3 · Cited by 37
Science and Anti-Science: Objectivity and Its Real Enemies
Lloyd, E. A. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1742-2_11 · Cited by 37
Gender and Economic Ideologies
Nelson, J. A. (1993) · Review of Social Economy · doi:10.1080/758537259 · Cited by 37
Bianchini, J. A., Whitney, D. J., Breton, T. D., & Brown, B. A. (2001) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.1043 · Cited by 37
Values, Advocacy and Conservation Biology
Odenbaugh, J. (2003) · Environmental Values · doi:10.1177/096327190301200104 · Cited by 37
Assertion, Nonepistemic Values, and Scientific Practice
Franco, P. L. (2016) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/688939 · Cited by 36
Never let an academic crisis go to waste: Leadership Studies in the wake of journal retractions
Spoelstra, S., Butler, N., & Delaney, H. (2016) · Leadership · doi:10.1177/1742715016658215 · Cited by 41
COVID-19 and the Paradox of Scientific Advice
Pamuk, Z. (2021) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592721001201 · Cited by 38
PISA 2018 Global Competence Framework
OECD (2019) · Programme for international student assessment/Internationale Schulleistungsstudie · doi:10.1787/043fc3b0-en · Cited by 39
Revisiting the Foundations of the Family Resemblance Approach to Nature of Science: Some New Ideas
Irzık, G., & Nola, R. (2022) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-022-00375-7 · Cited by 36
Buckley, Y. M. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672547.003.0007 · Cited by 37
Fish Welfare in Aquaculture: Explicating the Chain of Interactions Between Science and Ethics
Bovenkerk, B., & Meijboom, F. L. B. (2012) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-012-9395-x · Cited by 36
Janack, M. (2002) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/0269172022000025624 · Cited by 36
Disagreement or denialism? “Invasive species denialism” and ethical disagreement in science
Frank, D. M. (2019) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02259-w · Cited by 41
A contrary view of the technical writing classroom: Notes toward future discussion
Bushneil, J. (1999) · Technical Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10572259909364658 · Cited by 36
Levers, L. L. (2006) · Journal of Psychology in Africa · doi:10.1080/14330237.2006.10820108 · Cited by 37
The Matter at Hand: Butler, Ontology and the Natural Sciences
Kerin, J. (1999) · Australian Feminist Studies · doi:10.1080/08164649993353 · Cited by 37
The Philosophical Dullness of Classical Ecology, and a Levinsian Alternative
Haila, Y., & Taylor, P. J. (2001) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1023/a:1006632817807 · Cited by 36
Questionable Metascience Practices
Rubin, M. (2023) · Journal of Trial and Error · doi:10.36850/mr4 · Cited by 40
Transformative Transdisciplinarity
Ludwig, D., & El-Hani, C. N. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197815281.001.0001 · Cited by 35
Miller, T. R., & Neff, M. W. (2013) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-013-9234-x · Cited by 37
On the evidentiary standards for nutrition advice
Jukola, S. (2018) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2018.05.007 · Cited by 35
The Devils in the DALY: Prevailing Evaluative Assumptions
Solberg, C. T., Sørheim, P., Müller, K. E., Gamlund, E., Norheim, O. F., & Barra, M. (2020) · Public Health Ethics · doi:10.1093/phe/phaa030 · Cited by 35
Sensational Science, Archaic Hominin Genetics, and Amplified Inductive Risk
Havstad, J. C. (2021) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1017/can.2021.15 · Cited by 37
Explanatory Judgment, Moral Offense and Value-Free Science
Colombo, M., Bucher, L., & Inbar, Y. (2015) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-015-0282-z · Cited by 35
The roles of ethics in gene drive research and governance
Thompson, P. B. (2018) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1415587 · Cited by 35
Legitimizing Values in Regulatory Science
Pinto, M. F., & Hicks, D. (2019) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp3317 · Cited by 35
On the relationship between feminism and farm women
Brandth, B. (2002) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1023/a:1016011527245 · Cited by 39
Nelson, L. H. (1993) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1993.tb00098.x · Cited by 35
Mind, Society, and the Growth of Knowledge
Thagard, P. R. (1994) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/289826 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Longino, H. E.
- Corresponding author
- Longino, Helen E.
- ORCID
- Longino, Helen E.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 1990-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4300559119
- Cited by
- 3,092
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 244 · 2025: 296 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 169 · 2022: 212 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 145 · 2019: 173 · 2018: 128 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 100 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 80 · 2012: 58
- FWCI
- 81.08
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education, Politics, and Culture Studies
- Keywords
- philosophy of science, sociology of science, scientific knowledge, epistemology of science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
