The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Likewise, authoritative knowledge emerges through organized critical scrutiny and communal validation rather than expertise alone [22].”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Knowledge acquires legitimacy by passing through institutional processes of review, debate, and revision.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Longino's [22] social epistemology argues that epistemic authority emerges through organized criticism, peer evaluation, and communal scrutiny rather than through expertise alone.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Across the generative pipeline, successive transformations from cultural corpora to datasets, from datasets to base models, and from base models to instruction-tuned systems enact epistemic and normative boundaries that delimit what forms of meaning become legible, what interpretive options are foregrounded, and which traditions of validation remain visible or are displaced [11,17,22].”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Expertise is therefore a necessary but insufficient condition for authority.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“This separation reflects Longino's [22] model of epistemic communities, in which reliability emerges through structured critical interaction.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Longino's [22] model of epistemic communities and Serres's [35] notion of quasi-objects are relevant here: interpretive artefacts circulate within collectives, generating authority through structured participation rather than individual assertion.”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Rather than locating legitimacy in model behavior or output quality, the framework situates it in publicly inspectable practices of disclosure, review, and validation that organize how interpretive claims are produced, circulated, and authorized [11,22].”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Because scientific theories, hypotheses, and models are based on human perceptual categories, concepts, and assumptions, bias-free research is not possible [121, 125, 137].”
From The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2025) · cites this paper as [137]
In the citing paper
“Third, during the data-interpretation stage researchers make variousassumptions based on interpretive frameworks, analytical tools, concepts, and background theories (Elliott et al 2016, Longino 1990).”
From Data-Intensive Science and Research Integrity (2017) · cites this paper as Longino 1990
In the citing paper
“However, if an individual possesses too little background knowledge, he or she will not even be able to understand that the anomalous data are anomalous (cf.Lijnse, 1990;Longino, 1990).”
From The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. (1993) · cites this paper as Longino, 1990
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,002
Bodies and Minds: Dualism in Evolutionary Theory
Oyama, S. (1991) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1991.tb01821.x · Cited by 15
Objectivity in Science: New Perspectives from Science and Technology Studies
Tulkki, L. (2016) · International Studies in the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1080/02698595.2017.1316118 · Cited by 15
Tuana, N. (2017) · Special publications · doi:10.1002/9781119067825.ch10 · Cited by 15
Situated objectivity, values and realism
Williams, M. (2014) · European Journal of Social Theory · doi:10.1177/1368431014549681 · Cited by 14
Alvarez, M., & Hyman, J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316779651.010 · Cited by 14
The Politics of Fundamentality
Ney, A. (2019) · The frontiers collection · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11301-8_4 · Cited by 14
Greene, J. A., Chinn, C. A., & Deekens, V. M. (2021) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2020.1860992 · Cited by 14
Ingram, S. (2020) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqaa011 · Cited by 14
On Validators for Psychiatric Categories
Solomon, M. (2022) · Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.5195/pom.2022.74 · Cited by 14
Peter, F. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198872382.003.0001 · Cited by 14
Socially responsible science: Exploring the complexities
de Melo‐Martín, I., & Intemann, K. K. (2023) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-023-00537-6 · Cited by 14
Designing learning environments to promote competent lay engagement with science
Chinn, C. A., Yoon, S. A., Hussain‐Abidi, H., Hunkar, K., Noushad, N. F., Cottone, A. M., & Richman, T. (2023) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12573 · Cited by 14
(What) Is Feminist Logic? (What) Do We Want It to Be?
Saint-Croix, C., & Cook, R. T. (2024) · History and Philosophy of Logic · doi:10.1080/01445340.2023.2295192 · Cited by 14
More Than Skin Deep: Situated Communities and Agent Orange in the Aluoi Valley, Vietnam
McHugh, N. A. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6835-5_9 · Cited by 14
Shala, E. (2015) · European Journal of Futures Research · doi:10.1007/s40309-015-0079-4 · Cited by 14
At the Heart of the Ikaahuk Archaeology Project
Hodgetts, L., & Kelvin, L. (2020) · Archaeologies of the Heart · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-36350-5_7 · Cited by 11
Scientific Ethics: A New Approach
Menapace, M. (2018) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-018-0050-4 · Cited by 17
Durán, J. M., & Pirtle, Z. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00211-7 · Cited by 17
Open Minds, Open Methods: Transparency and Inclusion in Pursuit of Better Scholarship
Rinke, E. M., & Wuttke, A. (2021) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096520001729 · Cited by 14
Understanding What It's Like To Be (Dis)Privileged
Wiltsher, N. (2021) · Pacific philosophical quarterly · doi:10.1111/papq.12338 · Cited by 15
Objectivity for the research worker
van Dongen, N. N. N., & Sikorski, M. (2021) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-021-00400-6 · Cited by 21
Forms of explanation and understanding for neuroscience and artificial intelligence
Thompson, J. A. F. (2021) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00195.2021 · Cited by 17
Blancke, S., & Boudry, M. (2021) · International Studies in the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1080/02698595.2022.2057777 · Cited by 14
Science Teachers’ Challenging Questions for Encouraging Students to Think and Speak in Novel Ways
Soysal, Y. (2022) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-022-00411-6 · Cited by 15
Reading Science Texts—Epistemology, Inquiry, Authenticity—A Rejoinder to Jonathan Osborne
Norris, S. P., Falk, H., Agraso, M. F., Jiménez‐Aleixandre, M. P., Phillips, L. M., & Yarden, A. (2009) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-008-9118-5 · Cited by 14
Gislason, M., & Andersen, H. (2016) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare4040078 · Cited by 17
Commercial interests, agenda setting, and the epistemic trustworthiness of nutrition science
Jukola, S. (2019) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02228-3 · Cited by 14
Scientific Understanding and the Control of Nature
LACEY, H. M. (1999) · Science & Education · doi:10.1023/a:1008678413285 · Cited by 14
The Potential of Adapted Primary Literature (APL) for Learning: A Response
Osborne, J. F. (2009) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-008-9117-6 · Cited by 14
Examining the social and scientific roles of invention in science education
Barton, A. C. (1998) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/bf02461647 · Cited by 14
The Commercialization of Research and the Quest for the Objectivity of Science
Jukola, S. (2014) · Foundations of Science · doi:10.1007/s10699-014-9377-8 · Cited by 17
Success, Truth and the Galilean Strategy
Magnus, P. D. (2003) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/54.3.465 · Cited by 14
The Current Status of Theorizing About Families
WHITE, J. M. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3987-5_2 · Cited by 14
Number and Ascriptions of Number in Wittgenstein's Tractatus
Floyd, J. (2001) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/019513916x.003.0008 · Cited by 14
Reconciling faith and fact: Pro‐life women discuss media, science and the abortion debate
Press, A. L., & Cole, E. R. (1995) · Critical Studies in Mass Communication · doi:10.1080/15295039509366947 · Cited by 14
The New Biological Determinism in Socio-Cultural Context
Brody, E. B. (1990) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/00048679009062900 · Cited by 14
Feminist Philosophy of Science
Nelson, L. H. (2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470756614.ch15 · Cited by 14
Context-Dependent Anomalies and Strategies for Resolving Disagreement
Allchin, D. (2015) · Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18600-9_9 · Cited by 13
Heuling, L. S., Mikelskis-Seifert, S., & Nückles, M. (2014) · Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/s40573-014-0024-2 · Cited by 13
What's the Fuss about Social Constructivism?
Dupré, J. (2004) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2004.1.1.73 · Cited by 13
How strong is the argument from inductive risk?
Henschen, T. (2021) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-021-00409-x · Cited by 13
Griesemer, J. R., & Barragán, C. A. (2022) · History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s40656-022-00497-9 · Cited by 14
Manufacturing Refused Knowledge in the Age of Epistemic Pluralism
Neresini, F., Agodi, M. C., Crabu, S., & Tosoni, S. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-7188-6 · Cited by 13
Costs and Benefits of Diverse Plurality in Economics
Lari, T., & Mäki, U. (2024) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/00483931241255230 · Cited by 13
Uncertainty, Risk, and Decision-Making:
Develaki, M. (2024) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-024-00544-w · Cited by 13
Virtual diversity: Resolving the tension between the wider culture and the institution of science
Collins, H. M., Evans, R., & Reyes-Galindo, L. I. (2024) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/03063127241263609 · Cited by 13
Fontanarrosa, G., Zarbá, L., Aschero, V., Santos, D. A. D., Montellano, M. G. N., Behr, M. C. P., Schroeder, N., Lomáscolo, S. B., Fanjul, M. E., Monmany-Garzia, A. C., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0307813 · Cited by 16
Gender, STEM Studies and Educational Choices. Insights from Feminist Perspectives
Allegrini, A. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7793-4_4 · Cited by 14
Implicit Bias, Stereotype Threat, and Political Correctness in Philosophy
Hermanson, S. (2017) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies2020012 · Cited by 14
Junges, A. L., & Massoni, N. T. (2018) · Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências · doi:10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2018182455 · Cited by 17
Managing value‐laden judgements in regulatory science and risk assessment
Elliott, K. C. (2019) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170709 · Cited by 13
Field Philosophy and Social Justice
Brister, E. (2020) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2020.1757176 · Cited by 13
What Constitutes an Explanation in Biology?
Potochnik, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108648981.003 · Cited by 13
Duschl, R. A., Avraamidou, L., & Azevedo, N. H. (2021) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-021-00225-y · Cited by 13
Sociology, Economics, and Gender
Nelson, J. A. (2010) · American Journal of Economics and Sociology · doi:10.1111/j.1536-7150.2010.00738.x · Cited by 13
Feminist Resources for Biomedical Research: Lessons from the HPV Vaccines
de Melo‐Martín, I., & Intemann, K. K. (2011) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01144.x · Cited by 14
Policy discourse as sanctioned ignorance: theorizing the erasure of feminist knowledge
Hawkesworth, M. (2010) · Critical Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/19460171003619691 · Cited by 13
Human Developmental Science for Social Justice
Russell, S. T. (2015) · Research in Human Development · doi:10.1080/15427609.2015.1068049 · Cited by 13
Multidisciplinary life cycle metrics and tools for green buildings
HELGESON, J. F., & Lippiatt, B. C. (2009) · Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management · doi:10.1897/ieam_2008-069.1 · Cited by 13
Moral Expertise in the Clinic: Lessons Learned from Medicine and Science
McClimans, L. M., & Slowther, A. (2016) · The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.1093/jmp/jhw011 · Cited by 13
Values and Data Collection in Social Research
Zahle, J. (2017) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/694770 · Cited by 13
Doucet, A. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66005-9_19 · Cited by 13
Nelson, L. H. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1742-2_6 · Cited by 13
Longino’s Theory of Objectivity and Commercialized Research
Jukola, S. (2015) · Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18600-9_7 · Cited by 13
Saints or Sinners: Sociobiological Theories of Male Homosexuality
Brookey, R. A. (2000) · International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies · doi:10.1023/a:1010185517893 · Cited by 13
The future of sex research and the meaning of science
Reiss, I. L. (1993) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499309551672 · Cited by 13
Bianchini, J. A., Brown, B. A., & Breton, T. D. (2002) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.10043 · Cited by 13
A Defense of Longino's Social Epistemology
Wray, K. B. (1999) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/392751 · Cited by 13
Evolutionary Epistemology, Social Epistemology, and the Demic Structure of Science
Grantham, T. A. (2000) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1023/a:1006718131883 · Cited by 13
Solomon, M. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-044451540-7/50031-1 · Cited by 13
Revaluing Science: Starting from the Practices of Women
Tuana, N. (1996) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1742-2_2 · Cited by 13
Lennon, K. (1995) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.1995.9960600 · Cited by 16
Controversies in Breast Cancer Research
Rosser, S. V. (2000) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-03779-4_9 · Cited by 13
Feminist Values and Cognitive Virtues
Nelson, L. H., & Nelson, J. (1994) · PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association · doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1994.2.192923 · Cited by 13
Perspectives on global warming
Yearley, S., Mercer, D., Pitman, A. J., Орескес, Н., & Conway, E. M. (2012) · Metascience · doi:10.1007/s11016-011-9639-9 · Cited by 13
Kourany, J. A. (2003) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/367866 · Cited by 13
New Directions in Philosophy of Medicine
Stegenga, J., Kennedy, A. G., Tekin, S., Jukola, S., & Bluhm, A. R. (2017) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781474233033.ch-015 · Cited by 13
Epistemic governance of diverse research practices and knowledge production: an introduction
Lund, R., Blackmore, J., & Rowlands, J. (2022) · Critical Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/17508487.2022.2136226 · Cited by 13
Social and cognitive diversity in science: introduction
Rolin, K. H., Koskinen, I., Kuorikoski, J., & Reijula, S. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04261-9 · Cited by 13
The Next Chapter for Psychological Science
Vazire, S. (2023) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976231221558 · Cited by 13
Seiz, J. A. (1992) · Recent economic thought · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-2942-8_8 · Cited by 13
“Choice-supportive bias” in science: Explanation and mitigation
Kafaee, M., Marhamati, H., & Gharibzadeh, S. (2021) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2021.1872377 · Cited by 12
Khatiwada, M., Howard, D., Krempley, T., Walton, K. M., Williams, C. S., & Graber, A. D. (2026) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2026.2632012 · Cited by 12
E-Cigarettes and the Multiple Responsibilities of the FDA
Svirsky, L., Howard, D., & Berman, M. L. (2021) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2021.1907478 · Cited by 12
Climate Change and Culpable Ignorance: The Case of Pseudoscience
Pongiglione, F., & Martini, C. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2052994 · Cited by 12
7. Ideal og realitet i spesialundervisninga
Haug, P. (2022) · Fagbokforlaget eBooks · doi:10.55669/oa010307 · Cited by 12
Ma, C. (2023) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2023.2283703 · Cited by 12
THREATS TO OBJECTIVITY IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH
Vuković, M., Urošević, S., & Dašić, D. (2023) · SPORTS MEDIA AND BUSINESS · doi:10.58984/smb2302143v · Cited by 12
Objectivity in Geosites Inventorying and Assessment Methods
Cameron, E. (2024) · Geoheritage · doi:10.1007/s12371-024-00938-w · Cited by 12
Taniguchi, T., Takagi, S., Otsuka, J., Hayashi, Y., & Hamada, H. T. (2025) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.241678 · Cited by 19
Situated Knowledge and the Interplay of Value Judgments and Evidence in Scientific Inquiry
Anderson, E. (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0475-5_8 · Cited by 16
Introduction: When Difference Makes a Difference
Wylie, A. (2006) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.1 · Cited by 12
Developments and Debates in the Historiography of Philosophy
Beaney, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316779651.058 · Cited by 12
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Poverty Measurement, Epistemic Injustices and Social Activism
Beck, V., Hahn, H., & Lepenies, R. (2020) · Philosophy and poverty · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-31711-9_1 · Cited by 12
Future value change: Identifying realistic possibilities and risks
Hopster, J. K. G. (2022) · Prometheus · doi:10.13169/prometheus.38.1.0113 · Cited by 12
The medical model of “obesity” and the values behind the guise of health
Mehl, K. R. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04209-z · Cited by 12
On masks and masking: epistemic harms and science communication
Intemann, K. K., & de Melo‐Martín, I. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04322-z · Cited by 12
Beliefs, values and emotions: An interactive approach to distrust in science
Furman, K. (2023) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2023.2266454 · Cited by 12
Niiniluoto, I. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-044451548-3/50005-7 · Cited by 12
Evidence‐based medical knowledge: the neglected role of expert opinion
Hofmeijer, J. (2014) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.12267 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Longino, H. E.
- Corresponding author
- Longino, Helen E.
- ORCID
- Longino, Helen E.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 1990-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4300559119
- Cited by
- 3,092
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 244 · 2025: 296 · 2024: 188 · 2023: 169 · 2022: 212 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 145 · 2019: 173 · 2018: 128 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 100 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 80 · 2012: 58
- FWCI
- 81.08
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education, Politics, and Culture Studies
- Keywords
- philosophy of science, sociology of science, scientific knowledge, epistemology of science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
