Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 438

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Behavioral Assessment of Hippocampal Function Based on a Subregional Analysis

Kesner, R.P., Lee, I., Gilbert, P.·2004·Reviews in the Neurosciences

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to determine whether specific subregions (dentate gyrus [DG], CA3, and CA1) of the hippocampus provide unique contributions to specific processes associated with intrinsic information processing exemplified by novelty detection, encoding, pattern separation, pattern association, pattern completion, retrieval, short-term memory and intermediate-term memory. Based on anatomical neural network organization, electrophysiology of cellular activity, lesions, early gene activation, and computational modeling, it can be shown that there exists extensive cooperation among the three subregions of the hippocampus, but there also exists reliable specificity of function for each of the subregions of the hippocampus. The primary process supported by the DG subregion of the hippocampus can be characterized by orthogonalization of sensory inputs to create a metric spatial representation. Furthermore the DG participates in conjunction with CA3 in supporting spatial pattern separation. The CA3 subregion of the hippocampus supports processes associated with spatial pattern association, spatial pattern completion, novelty detection, and short-term memory. The CA1 subregion of the hippocampus supports processes associated with temporal pattern association, temporal pattern completion, and intermediate-term memory. Furthermore, the CA3 in conjunction with CA1 supports temporal pattern separation. All the above-mentioned processes are assumed to reflect intrinsic processing of information within the hippocampus. The diversity of functions associated with the different subregions of the hippocampus suggests that one should not treat the hippocampus as a single entity, but rather that one should concentrate on elucidating further the functions of both dorsal and ventral subregions of the hippocampus and pathways that directly connect each of the subregions as well as their connections with the entorhinal cortex.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/revneuro.2004.15.5.333

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 438

Metadata

Authors
Kesner, R. P., Lee, I., & Gilbert, P.
Venue
Reviews in the Neurosciences
Published
2004-01
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
333-51
ISSN
  • 0334-1763 (ISSN-L)
  • 2191-0200
OpenAlex
W2082087376
Cited by
438
References
50
FWCI
13.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Behavioral Assessment of Hippocampal Function Based on a Subregional Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/revneuro.2004.15.5.333
The paper
Kesner, R. P., Lee, I., & Gilbert, P. (2004). A Behavioral Assessment of Hippocampal Function Based on a Subregional Analysis. Reviews in the Neurosciences. https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro.2004.15.5.333

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.