Cited by 173Berberine and alkaloids researchNatural Antidiabetic Agents StudiesMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer

Berberine on metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors: An analysis from preclinical evidences to clinical trials

Derosa, Giuseppe, Maffioli, Pamela, Cicero, Arrigo FG·2012·Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypercholesterolemia have proven to give an increased incidence of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Recent studies have suggested that the natural alkaloid berberine could have pharmacological activities potentially useful in diabetes and hypercholesterolemia management. AREAS COVERED: The aim of this review is to evaluate the metabolic properties of the natural alkaloid berberine, and its potential application to the treatment of diabetes and CVD prevention. EXPERT OPINION: Berberine proved to be effective in improving glycemic control and lipid profile. The modern investigation on berberine pharmacological activity is actually developing and numerous scientific evidences are actually in progress and reported in international congresses. The near future perspective is the isolation or neo-synthesis of berberine analogs with a higher bioavailability. The anti-hyperlipidemic and anti-diabetic effects of berberine have to be related to markers of improvement in organ damage in humans; longer trials are needed to better evaluate the safety profile of the molecule, when administered alone or in association with other anti-hyperlipidemic or anti-diabetic drugs, especially in the European population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1517/14712598.2012.704014

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Derosa, G., Maffioli, P., & Cicero, A. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Pavia (IT)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
Venue
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Published
2012-07-11
Volume
12
Issue
8
Pages
1113-1124
ISSN
  • 1471-2598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7682
OpenAlex
W2008978505
Cited by
171
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Berberine and alkaloids research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Keywords
berberine, type 2 diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, cardiovascular disease prevention, glycemic control, lipid profile, hypolipidemic effect, anti-diabetic effects, bioavailability, drug safety, natural alkaloids
MeSH terms
Animals, Anticholesteremic Agents, Berberine Alkaloids, Blood Glucose, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review