Cited by 735Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionFrailty in Older AdultsMotor Control and Adaptation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Normative Values for the Unipedal Stance Test with Eyes Open and Closed

Springer, Barbara A., Marin, Raul, Cyhan, Tamara, Roberts, Holly, Gill, Norman W.·2007·Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy

Abstract

Purpose Limited normative data are available for the unipedal stance test (UPST), making it difficult for clinicians to use it confidently to detect subtle balance impairments. The purpose of this study was to generate normative values for repeated trials of the UPST with eyes opened and eyes closed across age groups and gender. Methods This prospective, mixed-model design was set in a tertiary care medical center. Healthy subjects (n= 549), 18 years or older, performed the UPST with eyes open and closed. Mean and best of 3 UPST times for males and females of 6 age groups (18-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80+) were documented and inter-rater reliability was tested. Results There was a significant age dependent decrease in UPST time during both conditions. Inter-rater reliability for the best of 3 trials was determined to be excellent with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.994 (95% confidence interval 0.989-0.996) for eyes open and 0.998 (95% confidence interval 0.996-0.999) for eyes closed. Conclusions This study adds to the understanding of typical performance on the UPST. Performance is age-specific and not related to gender. Clinicians now have more extensive normative values to which individuals can be compared.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/00139143-200704000-00003

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 55 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Lehmann, 1990, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 71, 955
  2. Lafont, 1998, JAS, 46, 928
  3. Vellas, 1997, Aging, 9, 95
  4. Vellas, 1997, J Am Geriatr Soc, 45, 735, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb01479.x · DOI
  5. Potvin, 1975, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 56, 425
  6. Brinkman, 1996, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, 140, 2176
  7. Gehlsen, 1990, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 71, 739
  8. Bulbulian, 2000, Physiol Behav, 70, 319, 10.1016/s0031-9384(00)00272-9 · DOI
  9. Hertel, 2006, Hum Mov Sci, 22, 67

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 731

Metadata

Authors
Springer, B. A., Marin, R., Cyhan, T., Roberts, H., & Gill, N. W.
Affiliations
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Springer, Barbara A.
Venue
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy
Published
2007-04
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
8-15
ISSN
1539-8412 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054134869
Cited by
735
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 7
FWCI
12.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
reference values, balance disorders, postural stability, eyes open and closed, age-related decline, inter-rater reliability, healthy adults, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Cross-Sectional Studies, Postural Balance, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Reference Values, Vision, Ocular, Confidence Intervals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review