Cited by 65Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies

Fear of Emotions, Experiential Avoidance, and Intolerance of Uncertainty in Worry and Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Buhr, Kristin, Dugas, Michel J.·2012·International Journal of Cognitive Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/ijct.2012.5.1.1

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buhr, K., & Dugas, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Concordia University (CA)
  • Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (CA)
Venue
International Journal of Cognitive Therapy
Published
2012-03
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
1-17
ISSN
1937-1209 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067577481
Cited by
65
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Cognitive Therapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Keywords
experiential avoidance, intolerance of uncertainty, worry, generalized anxiety disorder, excessive worry, emotional responses, replication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review