Cited by 6Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Evaluation of magical thinking: Validation of the Illusory Beliefs Inventory

Shihata, Sarah, Egan, Sarah J., Rees, Clare S.·2014·Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

Abstract

Magical thinking has been related to obsessive-compulsive disorder; yet, little research has examined this construct in other anxiety disorders. The Illusory Beliefs Inventory (IBI) is a recently developed measure of magical thinking. The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of this new measure and to determine if magical thinking accounts for pathological worry beyond the well-researched constructs of intolerance of uncertainty (IU) and perfectionism. A sample of 502 participants completed an online survey. Confirmatory factor analysis identified a three-factor solution for the IBI, and the measure had good internal consistency (α = .92), test-retest reliability (r = .94) and discriminant validity. Magical thinking, IU, and perfectionism all predicted pathological worry; however, magical thinking accounted for less than 1% of unique variance in worry, suggesting that it is not strongly related to worry. Further investigation regarding the validity and clinical utility of the IBI is required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16506073.2014.926391

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People may feel anxious in uncertain situations and may struggle to tolerate this anxiety, attempting to manage it with supernatural beliefs; magical thinking can be one of their coping mechanisms.

    “People may feel anxious in uncertain situations and may struggle to tolerate this anxiety, attempting to manage it with supernatural beliefs. At this point, magical thinking can be one of their coping mechanisms.[14]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shihata, S., Egan, S. J., & Rees, C. S.
Affiliations
Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Egan, Sarah J.
Venue
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Published
2014-06-24
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
251-261
ISSN
  • 1650-6073 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2316
OpenAlex
W1964433917
Cited by
6
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
magical thinking, pathological worry, intolerance of uncertainty, perfectionism, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, psychometric validation, factor structure
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Culture, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Personality, Reproducibility of Results, Uncertainty, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review