Cited by 229Emotions and Moral BehaviorImpact of Technology on AdolescentsPersonality Traits and Psychology

Social Comparison, Envy, and Depression on Facebook: A Study Looking at the Effects of High Comparison Standards on Depressed Individuals

Appel, Helmut, Crusius, Jan, Gerlach, Alexander L.·2015·Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

The co-occurrence of depression and envy is both plausible and empirically established. However, little is known about the mechanisms underlying this correlation. An account is proposed according to which low self-esteem in depressed individuals leads to upward social comparison and thus makes envy more likely. This effect should frequently occur in online social networks like Facebook because they allow for easy impression management and hence provide high comparison standards. In a quasi-experimental online study, depressed and nondepressed participants indicated their self-esteem and were then presented with specifically set up Facebook profiles that were either attractive or unattractive. Participants were asked to compare themselves to the profile owner and to report their resulting feelings of inferiority and envy. Depressed participants were more envious, especially after seeing the attractive profile. Envy was associated with higher self-reported inferiority and also correlated negatively with self-esteem. The connection between depression and envy is demonstrated with an experimental elicitation of envy for the first time. The results strongly suggest that low self-esteem and consequent feelings of inferiority play a crucial role in depressed individuals' elevated levels of envy. Practical implications and limitations are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/jscp.2015.34.4.277

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Negative social comparison on social media has been associated with poor mental health such as increased depressive and anxiety symptoms.

    “Similar to PSMU, negative social comparison on social media has been associated with poor mental health such as increased depressive and anxiety symptoms (Appel et al., 2015; Schmuck et al., 2019; Yoon et al., 2019).”

    From Problematic social media use and inhibitory control among post-secondary students (2025) · cites this paper as Appel et al., 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Appel, H., Crusius, J., & Gerlach, A. L.
Affiliations
University of Cologne (DE)
Venue
Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
Published
2015-04
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
277-289
ISSN
0736-7236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159033485
Cited by
229
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
FWCI
22.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
envy, depression, social comparison, self-esteem, inferiority, Facebook, social networking sites, impression management, upward social comparison, Facebook profiles, social media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review