Cited by 108COVID-19 and Mental HealthImpact of Technology on AdolescentsCommunication and COVID-19 Impact

The role of online social comparison as a protective factor for psychological wellbeing: A longitudinal study during the COVID-19 quarantine

Open access
Ruggieri, Stefano, Ingoglia, Sonia, Bonfanti, Rubinia Celeste, Lo Coco, Gianluca·2021·Personality and Individual Differences

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic crisis, the experience of quarantine has been an undesirable condition for people and it can have a negative impact on mental health and psychological wellbeing. Social isolation has led to an increase in time spent on social network sites, with people interacting more frequently with each other, and comparing online the way in which they are experiencing the same state of home confinement. Our study aimed to investigate the role of online social comparison on individuals' psychological distress and life satisfaction during the COVID-19-related quarantine. Specifically, a cross-lagged panel study at three-waves was conducted in Italy in order to examine the change in psychosocial distress levels (e.g. depression, anxiety, stress, loneliness, low life-satisfaction) from before the quarantine for a period of one month, as well as the predictive role of online social comparison to ameliorate individual distress. An online survey was distributed through a social media platform three times after the initial lockdown and at the epidemic's peak two and five weeks later. A total of 113 participants participated in an online survey between the 7th of March and 14th of April 2020. The results showed an increase in the levels of loneliness, depression, stress, anxiety and a decrease in the level of life satisfaction in the pre/post quarantine comparison. Our cross-lagged results also showed that online social comparison at T1 and T2 predicted the individual's improvement in levels of anxiety, stress, loneliness and life satisfaction over time. Overall, the results of the current study underline the positive effects of online social comparison on the reduction of psychological distress during the COVID-19 quarantine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110486

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study in Italy suggested an increase in stress, anxiety, and life satisfaction levels between the second and third testing sessions, but a stable depression level over time.

    “A study conducted at three separate times during the first month of lockdown in Italy suggested an increase in stress, anxiety and life satisfaction levels between the second and the third testing sessions, but a stable depression level over time (46).”

    From The Evolution of Psychological and Behavioral Consequences of Self-Isolation During Lockdown: A Longitudinal Study Across United Kingdom and Italy (2022) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Results (Test of hypotheses; page not provided) report increased stress and anxiety from T2 to T3, and no significant depression change across that interval. But life satisfaction decreased, not increased, from T2 to T3; depression also increased significantly from T1 to T2, so it was not stable over the full study period. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Our research suggested significant deleterious effects after the first week, followed by stabilization of scores during the subsequent quarantine period, supporting the view that individuals may adapt to the negative consequences of social isolation and home confinement.

    “Consistent with the literature, our research suggested significant deleterious effects after the first week, followed by stabilization of the scores during the subsequent quarantine period, supporting the view that individuals may adapt to the negative consequences of social isolation and home confinement (10, 46, 93).”

    From The Evolution of Psychological and Behavioral Consequences of Self-Isolation During Lockdown: A Longitudinal Study Across United Kingdom and Italy (2022) · cites this paper as [46]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruggieri, S., Ingoglia, S., Bonfanti, R. C., & Lo Coco, G.
Affiliations
  • Università degli Studi di Enna Kore (IT)
  • University of Palermo (IT)
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
171
Pages
110486
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3094758130
Cited by
107
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 27
FWCI
7.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
Keywords
COVID-19 quarantine, psychological well-being, psychological distress, loneliness, depression, anxiety, stress, life satisfaction, social isolation, social network sites, protective factors, lockdown

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review