Clinicians' Personality Descriptions of Prototypic Personality Disorders
Abstract
Many studies have indicated close convergence of the DSM-IV personality disorders and the five-factor model (FFM) of personality functioning. However, questions have been raised concerning the ability of clinicians to describe personality disorders in terms of the FFM. This study developed a FFM description by practicing clinicians of each DSM-IV personality disorder. Clinicians rated a prototypic case of each DSM-IV personality disorder in terms of the FFM. These ratings, which achieved excellent reliability, were then averaged to produce a consensus FFM profile for each personality disorder. The consensus ratings showed good agreement with previous research that examined both researchers' and clinicians' application of the FFM to prototypic cases of personality disorders. These results suggest that clinicians can conceptualize and apply the FFM to personality disorders in a consistent way. The results further suggest that the FFM may provide a richer and more comprehensive description of personality difficulties than the current DSM-IV personality disorder categories.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lay raters' consensual profile of narcissistic individuals strongly matched academician (r = 0.92) and clinician (r = 0.95) profiles of prototypical NPD.
“Despite the purposeful lack of explicit operationalization of narcissism provided to these lay raters, the consensual profile of narcissistic individuals strongly matched the academician, i.e., r = 0.92 (Lynam & Widiger 2001), and clinician profiles, i.e., r = 0.95 (Samuel & Widiger 2004), of the prototypical NPD profile.”
From Controversies in Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Samuel & Widiger 2004
Cites
The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure
Goldberg, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 · Cited by 5,530 · see citing works
A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description.
Block, J. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.187 · Cited by 1,682 · see citing works
Personality disorders and the five factor model of personality
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1990) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.1990.4.4.362 · Cited by 1,653 · see citing works
Lynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2001) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.110.3.401 · Cited by 688 · see citing works
Self-citationJang, K. L., McCrae, R. R., Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., & Livesley, W. J. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1556 · Cited by 539 · see citing works
Personality at Midlife: Stability, Intrinsic Maturation, and Response to Life Events
Costa, P. T., Herbst, J. H., McCrae, R. R., & Siegler, I. C. (2000) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/107319110000700405 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Classification of Personality Disorder
Tyrer, P., & Alexander, J. (1979) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.135.2.163 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Childhood conscientiousness and longevity: Health behaviors and cause of death.
Friedman, H. S., Tucker, J. S., Schwartz, J. E., Martin, L. R., Tomlinson-Keasey, C., Wingard, D. L., & Criqui, M. H. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.696 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Hyatt, C. S., & Campbell, W. K. (2017) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045244 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
The Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory: A Five-Factor Measure of Narcissistic Personality Traits
Glover, N., Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Crego, C., & Widiger, T. A. (2012) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.670680 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Self-citationMiller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., McCain, J. L., Few, L. R., Crego, C., Widiger, T. A., & Campbell, W. K. (2016) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi_2015_29_177 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Self-citationGrandiose and Vulnerable Narcissism and the<i>DSM–5</i>Pathological Personality Trait Model
Miller, J. D., Gentile, B., Wilson, L., & Campbell, W. K. (2013) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.685907 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Convergence of Narcissism Measures From the Perspective of General Personality Functioning
Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191108314278 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationMiller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Campbell, W. K., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2008) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.08.012 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Clinical utility of a dimensional model of personality disorder.
Widiger, T. A., & Mullins-Sweatt, S. N. (2010) · Professional Psychology: Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0021694 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationWeiss, B., Sleep, C., Miller, J. D., & Campbell, W. K. (2023) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.2023.37.2.131 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality Disorders
- Publisher
- Guilford Publications
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 286-308
- ISSN
- 0885-579X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127857608
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- personality disorders, Big Five personality traits, DSM-IV personality disorders, clinician ratings, personality disorder classification, personality functioning
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Clinical Competence, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Personality Disorders, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Psychology, Clinical, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Observer Variation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
