Cited by 183Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyBipolar Disorder and TreatmentPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Volumes of the hippocampus and amygdala in patients with borderline personality disorder: a meta-analysis

Nunes, Paulo Menezes, Wenzel, Amy, Borges, Karinne Tavares, Porto, Cristianne Ribeiro, Caminha, Renato Maiato, de Oliveira, Irismar Reis·2009·Journal of Personality Disorders

Abstract

Individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD) often exhibit impulsive and aggressive behavior. The hippocampus and amygdala form part of the limbic system, which plays a central role in controlling such expressions of emotional reactivity. There are mixed results in the literature regarding whether patients with BPD have smaller hippocampal and amygdalar volume relative to healthy controls. To clarify the precise nature of these mixed results, we performed a meta-analysis to aggregate data on the size of the hippocampus and amygdala in patients with BPD. Seven publications involving six studies and a total of 104 patients with BPD and 122 healthy controls were included. A significantly smaller volume was found in both the right and left hippocampi and amygdala of patients with BPD compared to healthy controls. These findings raise the possibility that reduced hippocampal and amygdalar volumes are biological substrates of some symptoms of BPD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/pedi.2009.23.4.333

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many of these disorders involve hippocampal dysfunction.

    “Many of these disorders involve hippocampal dysfunction (Amaral et al., 2008; Nunes et al., 2009; Sheline, 2011; Sigurdsson et al., 2010).”

    From A map for social navigation in the human brain (2015) · cites this paper as Nunes et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nunes, P. M., Wenzel, A., Borges, K. T., Porto, C. R., Caminha, R. M., & de Oliveira, I. R.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR)
Venue
Journal of Personality Disorders
Published
2009-08
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
333-345
ISSN
0885-579X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011771510
Cited by
183
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 19
FWCI
11.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, hippocampus, amygdala, brain volume, limbic system, emotional reactivity, impulsivity, aggression, neuroanatomy
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Borderline Personality Disorder, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review