Cited by 505Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorSpatial Cognition and Navigation

A map for social navigation in the human brain

Open access
Tavares, Rita Morais, Mendelsohn, Avi, Grossman, Yael, Williams, Christian Hamilton, Shapiro, Matthew, Trope, Yaacov, Schiller, Daniela·2015·Neuron

Abstract

SUMMARY Deciphering the neural mechanisms of social behavior has propelled the growth of social neuroscience. The exact computations of the social brain, however, remain elusive. Here we investigated how the human brain tracks ongoing changes in social relationships using functional neuroimaging. Participants were lead characters in a role-playing game in which they were to find a new home and a job through interactions with virtual cartoon characters. We found that a two-dimensional geometric model of social relationships, a “social space” framed by power and affiliation, predicted hippocampal activity. Moreover, participants who reported better social skills showed stronger covariance between hippocampal activity and “movement” through “social space.” The results suggest that the hippocampus is crucial for social cognition, and imply that beyond framing physical locations, the hippocampus computes a more general, inclusive, abstract, and multidimensional cognitive map consistent with its role in episodic memory.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Using fMRI during a “choose-your-own-adventure” social role-playing game, the authors found that hippocampal activity tracked a two-dimensional social space framed by power and affiliation, represented as a vector from the participant to each character. Stronger hippocampal tracking correlated with better self-reported social skills, suggesting the hippocampus supports an abstract, egocentric cognitive map for social navigation.

Key findings

  • Left hippocampal BOLD signal correlated with the vector angle representing power modulated by affiliation during choice trials, but not with narrative or option regressors alone.
  • Hippocampal angle-related activity correlated negatively with social avoidance (Pearson’s r = −0.52, p = 0.03) and neuroticism (r = −0.69, p = 0.002), and positively with conscientiousness (r = 0.53, p = 0.03; did not survive multiple-comparison correction).
  • The precuneus/posterior cingulate cortex tracked vector length, interpreted as absolute social distance, and did not correlate with questionnaire scores.
  • Alternative models using independent power and affiliation axes, conjunction, simple interaction, non-egocentric coordinates, or scrambled participant coordinates did not produce significant hippocampal correlates at the corrected threshold.

Methods

  • 18 healthy adults (mean age = 29.7 ± 3.4 years, range 24–34, 10 males) completed a 26-min fMRI role-playing game as lead character interacting with six cartoon characters; choices changed power or affiliation with each character.
  • Social relationships were modeled in polar coordinates: vector angle = power modulated by affiliation relative to the participant; vector length = social distance. These values served as parametric regressors during options/choice trials in a random-effects GLM.
  • Whole-brain analyses were corrected for multiple comparisons using cluster-size thresholding to FWE p < 0.05; post-task questionnaires assessed social anxiety, self-efficacy, personality, and subjective social status, and a memory test assessed storyline recall.

Limitations

  • The paper states that it did not compare egocentric and allocentric tasks directly and therefore cannot distinguish those claims directly; it also states that methods did not explicitly vary mnemonic demands.
  • Evident from the text: the sample was small (n = 18) and drawn from medically and psychiatrically healthy adults, so generalization to clinical or broader populations is limited.
  • Evident from the text: social relationships were with fictional cartoon characters in a controlled game, and the social-skill findings are correlational, so causal direction and real-world social behavior remain untested.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.011

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 44 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    A two-dimensional geometric model of social relationships, a "social space" framed by power and affiliation, predicted hippocampal activity.

    “We found that a two-dimensional geometric model of social relationships, a “social space” framed by power and affiliation, predicted hippocampal activity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Participants who reported better social skills showed stronger covariance between hippocampal activity and "movement" through "social space."

    “Moreover, participants who reported better social skills showed stronger covariance between hippocampal activity and “movement” through “social space.””
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    The hippocampus constructs an abstract geometric representation of social relationships during social interactions.

    “Here we show that the hippocampus constructs an abstract geometric representation of social relationships during social interactions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    None of these regions was activated during the narrative trials.

    “None of these regions was activated during the narrative trials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Hippocampal parametric activity associated with the angle values (power modulated by affiliation) correlated positively with conscientiousness (r = 0.53, p = 0.03; this correlation did not survive correction for multiple comparisons).

    “Hippocampal parametric activity associated with the angle values (power modulated by affiliation) correlated negatively with social avoidance (Pearson’s r = −0.52, p = 0.03) and neuroticism (r = −0.69, p = 0.002), and correlated positively with conscientiousness (r = 0.53, p = 0.03; this correlation did not survive correction for multiple comparisons).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 21
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 37
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Time to respond during the options trials did not correlate with the vector angle or the vector length regressors in any participant, precluding reaction time as an intervening factor.

    “Time to respond during the options trials did not correlate with the vector angle or the vector length regressors in any participant (angle: mean r = −0.075, SD = 0.13, mean p value = 0.48; vector length: mean r = 0.051, SD = 0.10, mean p value = 0.51), precluding reaction time as an intervening factor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The BOLD signal in the pre-SMA/dACC region did not correlate uniquely with the angle regressor, but also correlated with the non-parametric options regressor.

    “The BOLD signal in this region did not correlate uniquely with the angle regressor, but also correlated with the non-parametric options regressor (Figure S2C), possibly reflecting the decision-making process and the motor response during the options trials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    The options trials also engaged the left motor cortex, as expected due to participants' button pressing when making a choice.

    “The options trials also engaged the left motor cortex, as expected due to participants’ button pressing when making a choice (Tables S2 and S3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    BOLD responses analyzed during narrative or options trials relative to baseline showed the expected engagement of visual and language areas.

    “BOLD responses analyzed during narrative or options trials relative to baseline showed the expected engagement of visual and language areas (Tables S1 and S2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Hippocampal activity tracked the relative interaction between power and affiliation assigned to each character (the vector angle), but did not predict the absolute social distance between the character and the participant (the vector length).

    “Though hippocampal activity tracked the relative interaction between power and affiliation assigned to each character (the vector angle), it did not predict the absolute social distance between the character and the participant (the vector length).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: All characters were assumed to acquire locations in a participant’s social space during the first interaction, and from then on change power and affiliation with respect to the participant.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The starting point of each character in relation to the subject was distant from the participant’s point of view on the affiliation axis and at the same level on the power axis.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The neural correlates of the non-egocentric angle revealed a pre-SMA/dACC region, the insula, and left inferior parietal lobule, but activity in these regions was strongly correlated with the non-parametric options condition.

    “The neural correlates of this angle (p < 0.001, FWE corrected; Figure S3B) revealed a pre-SMA/dACC region (BA 32, overlapping with the region found for the vector angle from the point of view), as well as the insula (BA 13) and left inferior parietal lobule (BA 40), but activity in these regions was strongly correlated with the non-parametric options condition (Figure S3C).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The simple interaction model predicted activation in the prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum at a liberal threshold (p < 0.05, FWE corrected), but activity in these regions was better predicted by the non-parametric regressors of the narrative and options trials.

    “This model predicted activation in the prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum at a liberal threshold (p < 0.05, FWE corrected), but activity in these regions was better predicted by the non-parametric regressors of the narrative and options trials, suggesting a more general role in the task.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The BOLD response in the PCC/precuneus did not correlate with the narrative or options regressors, nor did it correlate with social skills assessed by the questionnaire scores.

    “The BOLD response in the PCC/precuneus did not correlate with the narrative or options regressors (Figure 5B), nor did it correlate with social skills assessed by the questionnaire scores.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The caudate showed enhanced BOLD responses bilaterally during the options trials, consistent with the well-documented role of this region in economic and social decision-making, and motor response.

    “The caudate showed enhanced BOLD responses bilaterally during the options trials (Figure S4), consistent with the well-documented role of this region in economic and social decision-making, and motor response (Brosch and Sander, 2013; Fareri and Delgado, 2014; Guitart-Masip et al., 2014; Lim et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Brosch and Sander, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Fareri and Delgado, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Guitart-Masip et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Several specific brain regions represent participants' assessment of power or affiliation.

    “Several specific brain regions represent participants’ assessment of power (social status in the community) (Muscatell et al., 2012) or affiliation (familiarity of acquaintances) (Parkinson et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Muscatell et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Parkinson et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The interpersonal circle theory of personality first proposed a representation of social relationships as vectors in a two-dimensional space.

    “The interpersonal circle theory of personality (Wiggins et al., 1989) first proposed a representation of social relationships as vectors in a two-dimensional space.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wiggins et al., 1989 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Relational memory theory proposes that hippocampal computations localize an individual in abstract "life" spaces.

    “Relational memory theory emphasizes this view, proposing that hippocampal computations localize an individual in abstract “life” spaces (Eichenbaum and Cohen, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Eichenbaum and Cohen, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The type of social interaction (power or affiliation) and the value of each choice (more or less power or affiliation) were validated separately.

    “The type of social interaction (power or affiliation) and the value of each choice (more or less power or affiliation) were validated separately (see Experimental Procedures).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Two main factors define social relationships: power and affiliation.

    “Theories in social psychology and experimental evidence across species identify two main factors that define social relationships: power (competence, dominance, hierarchy, etc.) and affiliation (warmth, intimacy, trustworthiness, love, etc.).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Fiske, 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Harris and Fiske, 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Todorov et al., 2005, 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The hippocampal system is crucial for remembering locations in physical space in many species.

    “The hippocampal system is crucial for remembering locations in physical space in many species (Bird and Burgess, 2008; Derdikman and Moser, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bird and Burgess, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Derdikman and Moser, 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The stereotype content model used two similar axes to describe how we evaluate individuals in our social environment: an axis of warmth and an axis of competence.

    “The stereotype content model (Fiske, 2012) used two similar axes to describe how we evaluate individuals in our social environment: an axis of warmth, our perception of the intentions of others, and an axis of competence, our perception of others’ ability to act on their intentions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fiske, 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Activity in these regions shows affiliation and power as independent factors with separate neural computations.

    “Activity in these regions shows affiliation and power as independent factors with separate neural computations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    These regions are engaged during social interactions perhaps by contributing to choice selection or action.

    “This activity pattern suggests that these regions are engaged during social interactions perhaps by contributing to choice selection or action.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    O'Keefe and Nadel emphasized that the hippocampus represents locations within two-dimensional Euclidean space in rats, and extended the idea to more general cognitive mapping functions in humans.

    “O’Keefe and Nadel (1978) emphasized that the hippocampus represents locations within two-dimensional Euclidean space in rats, and extended the idea to more general cognitive mapping functions in humans.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites O’Keefe and Nadel (1978)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The construal level theory suggests that common cognitive mechanisms process different types of psychological distance, whether temporal, spatial, or social.

    “The construal level theory (Trope and Liberman, 2010) suggests that common cognitive mechanisms process different types of psychological distance, whether temporal, spatial, or social.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Trope and Liberman, 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The same neural mechanisms that support episodic memory and spatial navigation may compute general conceptual spaces and provide a novel approach for investigating the social brain.

    “The same neural mechanisms that support episodic memory and spatial navigation may compute general conceptual spaces and provide a novel approach for investigating the social brain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If hippocampal activity guides social navigation by locating people within a personal context framed by power and affiliation, then PCC/precuneus activity signals only the social distance between others and ourselves.

    “By comparison, if hippocampal activity guides social navigation by locating people within a personal context framed by power and affiliation, then PCC/precuneus activity signals only the social distance between others and ourselves.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All analyses were corrected for multiple comparisons using cluster size threshold ensuring FWE rate of p < 0.05.

    “All analyses were corrected for multiple comparisons using cluster size threshold ensuring FWE rate of p < 0.05 (see Experimental Procedures for full details).”
    • Also stated in: § fMRI Data Analysis · plain
      “All analyses were corrected for multiple comparisons using cluster size threshold ensuring FWE rate of p < 0.05.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Social theories suggest that the interaction between power and affiliation, rather than each factor separately, is the major determinant of social perception.

    “Social theories (Fiske, 2012; Todorov et al., 2008; Wiggins et al., 1989), however, suggest that the interaction between power and affiliation, rather than each factor separately, is the major determinant of social perception.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Fiske, 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Todorov et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wiggins et al., 1989 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The metric quantified social relationships between the participant and each character during each social interaction as a function of power and affiliation, and corresponded well with the participant's subjective evaluations of the characters obtained after the social game.

    “This metric quantified social relationships between the participant and each character during each social interaction as a function of power and affiliation, and corresponded well with the participant’s subjective evaluations of the characters obtained after the social game.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: All characters were assumed to acquire locations in a participant’s social space during the first interaction, and from then on change power and affiliation with respect to the participant.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The starting point of each character in relation to the subject was distant from the participant’s point of view on the affiliation axis and at the same level on the power axis.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Neural mechanisms for tracking power and affiliation during social interactions likely evolved early and were conserved in mammals.

    “Because rapid assessment of kin and status is fundamental for reproduction and survival of social animals, neural mechanisms for tracking power and affiliation during social interactions likely evolved early and were conserved in mammals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Power and affiliation should be computed from an egocentric reference point.

    “This view suggests that power and affiliation should be computed from an egocentric reference point.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The face evaluation model proposed that two similar major axes, trustworthiness/valence and dominance/power, define face assessment.

    “The face evaluation model also proposed that two similar major axes, trustworthiness/valence and dominance/power, define face assessment (Todorov et al., 2005, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Todorov et al., 2005, 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Memory demands and performance were relatively constant throughout the task.

    “indicating that memory demands and performance were relatively constant throughout the task”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Power and affiliation are forms of psychological distance.

    “Power and affiliation are forms of psychological distance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Trope and Liberman, 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A hippocampal social map could guide social navigation.

    “Taken together, these ideas suggest that a hippocampal social map could guide social navigation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Representations of social events likely include other episodic or contextual information, including place and time as well as outcome expectancies, and social rules.

    “Representations of social events likely include other episodic or contextual information, including place and time as well as outcome expectancies, and social rules.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The Institutional Review Board of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai approved the experimental protocol.

    “The Institutional Review Board of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai approved the experimental protocol.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Poor memory for the outcome of social interactions or relative insensitivity to affiliation or power cues could impair tracking others' social coordinates and impoverish the 'social map.'

    “Poor memory for the outcome of social interactions or relative insensitivity to affiliation or power cues could impair tracking others’ social coordinates and impoverish the “social map.””
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Construal level theory predicts that subjective psychological distance is modified by changes in perceived distance across any number of physical and social dimensions.

    “The construal level theory predicts that subjective psychological distance is modified by changes in perceived distance across any number of physical and social dimensions (Maglio et al., 2013; Tamir and Mitchell, 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Maglio et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tamir and Mitchell, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    All participants provided written informed consent.

    “All participants provided written informed consent and were compensated for their participation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Previous studies have identified unique brain regions involved in processing different kinds of psychological distance.

    “Previous studies have identified unique brain regions involved in processing different kinds of psychological distance (Addis and Schacter, 2008; Brosch and Sander, 2013; Maglio et al., 2013; Mason and Just, 2011; Muscatell et al., 2012; Parkinson et al., 2014; Tamir and Mitchell, 2011; Weiler et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Addis and Schacter, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Brosch and Sander, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Maglio et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).

    Interpretationcitation

    The hippocampus does not encode an allocentric representation of social relationships.

    “suggesting that the hippocampus does not encode an allocentric representation of social relationships”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kumaran and Maguire, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The present study did not compare egocentric and allocentric tasks and cannot distinguish these claims directly.

    “The present study did not compare egocentric and allocentric tasks and cannot distinguish these claims directly.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The assignment of keys to choice direction was counterbalanced.

    “The assignment of keys to choice direction was counterbalanced (for example, in some trials key 1 indicated choice of more power, whereas on other trials key 1 indicated the opposite direction).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The categorization of interactions as power or affiliation was validated before the study by eight volunteers, and only interactions with >75% agreement were used.

    “The categorization was validated before the study by eight volunteers asked to make social choices, report their level of engagement with the storyline, and classify each interaction as power or affiliation. We used only interactions that were classified consistently (> 75% agreement between judges, or at least six out of eight judges).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The task was gender balanced by alternating randomly between four versions of the story.

    “The task was gender balanced by alternating randomly between four versions of the story, in which the genders of the characters were switched, maintaining an equal number of characters of each gender and assigned to equal numbers of male and female participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Neither place nor grid fields are purely allocentric in rats, but are modulated by heading direction, so changes in position in particular directions strongly influence activity.

    “Indeed, neither place nor grid fields are purely allocentric in rats, but are modulated by heading direction, so changes in position in particular directions strongly influence activity (Muller et al., 1994).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Muller et al., 1994 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The cognitive map theory argued that the hippocampus encodes allocentric representations, i.e., signals locations of the individual relative to an environmental reference frame.

    “The cognitive map theory argued that the hippocampus encodes allocentric representations, i.e., signals locations of the individual relative to an environmental reference frame (O’Keefe and Nadel, 1978).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites O’Keefe and Nadel, 1978

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The cognitive map theory posits that the hippocampus supports memory by computing an allocentric or world-centered spatial framework that links items to locations in an environment.

    “The cognitive map theory posits that the hippocampus supports memory by computing an allocentric or world-centered spatial framework that links items to locations in an environment (O’Keefe and Nadel, 1978).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites O’Keefe and Nadel, 1978

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    A previous fMRI study reported higher correlation of hippocampal activity to memory for where people interacted than to their social relationships.

    “a previous fMRI study that manipulated spatial and relational variables (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005) reported higher correlation of hippocampal activity to memory for where people interacted (whether or not they lived physically closer) than to their social relationships (whether or not they knew one another)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kumaran and Maguire, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The relational memory theory suggests that the hippocampus computes a more general framework that links items and events in a 'memory space' that includes temporal and personal as well as spatial context.

    “The relational memory theory suggests that the hippocampus computes a more general framework that links items and events in a “memory space” that includes temporal and personal as well as spatial context (Eichenbaum, 2004; Eichenbaum et al., 1999).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Eichenbaum, 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Eichenbaum et al., 1999 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    More recent work suggests that the hippocampus constructs spatially coherent scenes that are representative egocentrically.

    “More recent work suggests that the hippocampus constructs spatially coherent scenes that are representative egocentrically (Maguire and Mullally, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Maguire and Mullally, 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Memories for social events help inform sense of empowerment, obedience, and other aspects of social cognition that are likely computed by other brain regions.

    “Memories for social events in turn help inform sense of empowerment, obedience, and other aspects of social cognition that are likely computed by other brain regions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The final analysis included 18 medically and psychiatrically healthy adults.

    “The final analysis included 18 medically and psychiatrically healthy adults (mean age = 29.7 years, age range = 24–34 years, 10 males).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
50 of 50
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    All characters were assumed to acquire locations in a participant’s social space during the first interaction, and from then on change power and affiliation with respect to the participant.

    “Thus, all characters were assumed to acquire locations in a participant’s social space during the first interaction, and from then on change power and affiliation with respect to the participant.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The starting point of each character in relation to the subject was distant from the participant’s point of view on the affiliation axis and at the same level on the power axis.

    “Because we measured relational distance, we ascribed a common origin for all presented characters: the starting point of each character in relation to the subject was distant from the participant’s point of view on the affiliation axis (reflecting a neutral distance and allowing the character to move toward or away from the participant across interactions), and at the same level on the power axis”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The virtual role-playing game elicits social cognitive processes comparable to real-world social interactions.

    “To create a naturalistic paradigm of social encounters, we wrote a storyline (see below) using the principles of role-playing games and resembling a “choose-your-own-adventure” game.”
    “The participants were told they would be playing a virtual social game in the scanner, and choosing how to interact with a set of characters by using a button box.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Participants' subjective ratings of affiliation and power accurately reflect their internal social representations.

    “we asked the participants to distribute the dots according to their subjective evaluation of the characters’ position relative to themselves.”
    “Hippocampal BOLD activity predicted changes in subjective affiliation and power between people and fictional characters in a virtual role-playing game.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is preliminary evidence that social relationships may be represented through a hippocampal map.

    “as well as preliminary evidence that social relationships may also be represented through a hippocampal map (Tavares et al., 2015).”

    From Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience (2016) · cites this paper as Tavares et al., 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tavares, R. M., Mendelsohn, A., Grossman, Y., Williams, C. H., Shapiro, M., Trope, Y., & Schiller, D.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • University of Haifa (IL)
Corresponding author
Schiller, Daniela
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
231-243
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1575194766
Cited by
505
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 2
FWCI
15.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Simons Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH065658, R01MH073689)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Keywords
hippocampus, social cognition, social space, social navigation, interpersonal relationships, social skills, episodic memory, cognitive maps, role-playing games, virtual characters, social neuroscience
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Social Behavior, Young Adult, Functional Neuroimaging, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review