Cited by 48Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyMental Health Research Topics

Abnormalities in functional connectivity in borderline personality disorder: Correlations with metacognition and emotion dysregulation

Open access
Quattrini, Giulia, Pini, Lorenzo, Pievani, Michela, Magni, Laura R, Lanfredi, Mariangela, Ferrari, Clarissa, Boccardi, Marina, Bignotti, Stefano +7 more·2019·Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging

Abstract

A few studies reported functional abnormalities at rest in borderline personality disorder (BPD), but their relationship with clinical aspect is unclear. We aimed to assess functional connectivity (FC) in BPD patients and its association with BPD clinical features. Twenty-one BPD patients and 14 healthy controls (HC) underwent a multidimensional assessment and resting-state fMRI. Independent component analysis was performed to identify three resting-state networks: default mode network (DMN), salience network (SN), and executive control network (ECN). FC differences between BPD and HC were assessed with voxel-wise two-sample t-tests. Additionally, we investigated the mean FC within each network and the relationship between connectivity measures and BPD clinical features. Patients showed significant lower mean FC in the DMN and SN, while, at the local level, a cluster of lower functional connectivity emerged in the posterior cingulate cortex of the DMN. The DMN connectivity was positively correlated with the anger-state intensity and expression, while the SN connectivity was positively correlated with metacognitive abilities and a negative correlation emerged with the interpersonal aggression. The dysfunctional connectivity within these networks might explain clinical features of BPD patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2018.12.010

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another case-control study with 21 BPD patients and 14 healthy controls found evidence among the BPD cohort of lower functional connectivity within the brain's Salience Network and the Default Mode Network.

    “Another case-control study with 21 BPD patients and 14 healthy controls [137] found evidence among the BPD cohort of lower functional connectivity within the brain’s Salience Network (i.e., the limbic stress reactivity and PfC executive function sites) and the Default Mode Network (DMN) (i.e., midline sites from front to back of the brain that are involved in self-referential processing).”

    From Complex PTSD and borderline personality disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [137]

  • Reduced connectivity in the DMN was associated with heightened levels of anger and its interpersonal expression.

    “Reduced connectivity in the DMN was associated with heightened levels of anger and its interpersonal expression.”

    From Complex PTSD and borderline personality disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [137]

  • Reduced connectivity in the salience network was associated with impairment in higher order cognitive abilities and in the ability to inhibit interpersonal aggression.

    “Reduced connectivity in the salience network was associated with impairment in higher order cognitive abilities and in the ability to inhibit interpersonal aggression.”

    From Complex PTSD and borderline personality disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [137]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quattrini, G., Pini, L., Pievani, M., Magni, L. R., Lanfredi, M., Ferrari, C., Boccardi, M., Bignotti, S., Magnaldi, S., Cobelli, M., Rillosi, L., Beneduce, R., Rossi, G., Frisoni, G. B., & Rossi, R.
Affiliations
  • Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli (IT)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero (IT)
Corresponding author
Rossi, Roberta
Venue
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
283
Pages
118-124
ISSN
0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2906465404
Cited by
48
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Italian Ministry of Health (GR-2011-02351347)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, functional connectivity, resting-state networks, default mode network, salience network, frontoparietal network, metacognition, emotional dysregulation, anger, interpersonal aggression, posterior cingulate cortex, independent component analysis
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Adult, Affective Symptoms, Borderline Personality Disorder, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Net, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review