Cited by 317Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesBehavioral Health and InterventionsPsychology of Social Influence

Predicting persuasion-induced behavior change from the brain

Open access
Falk, E. B., Berkman, E. T., Mann, T., Harrison, B., Lieberman, M. D.·2010·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Although persuasive messages often alter people's self-reported attitudes and intentions to perform behaviors, these self-reports do not necessarily predict behavior change. We demonstrate that neural responses to persuasive messages can predict variability in behavior change in the subsequent week. Specifically, an a priori region of interest (ROI) in medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) was reliably associated with behavior change (r = 0.49, p < 0.05). Additionally, an iterative cross-validation approach using activity in this MPFC ROI predicted an average 23% of the variance in behavior change beyond the variance predicted by self-reported attitudes and intentions. Thus, neural signals can predict behavioral changes that are not predicted from self-reported attitudes and intentions alone. Additionally, this is the first functional magnetic resonance imaging study to demonstrate that a neural signal can predict complex real world behavior days in advance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0063-10.2010

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Falk, E. B., Berkman, E. T., Mann, T., Harrison, B., & Lieberman, M. D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-06-23
Volume
30
Issue
25
Pages
8421-8424
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2113483252
Cited by
317
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 21
FWCI
11.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (F31DA024904)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
persuasion, medial prefrontal cortex, persuasive messages, self-reported attitudes, neural correlates of behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Persuasive Communication, Health Behavior, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review