Cited by 147Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Treatment with an Amyloid-β Antibody Ameliorates Plaque Load, Learning Deficits, and Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease

Open access
Hartman, Richard E., Izumi, Yukitoshi, Bales, Kelly R., Paul, Steven M., Wozniak, David F., Holtzman, David M.·2005·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

PDAPP transgenic mice overexpress a mutant form of human amyloid precursor protein under control of the platelet-derived growth factor promoter in CNS neurons that causes early onset, familial Alzheimer's disease in humans. These mice, on a mixed genetic background, have been shown to have substantial learning impairments from early ages, as well as an age-dependent decline in learning ability that has been hypothesized to be caused by amyloid-beta (Abeta) accumulation. The goals of this study were to determine: (1) whether PDAPP mice on a pure C57BL/6 background develop more severe age-dependent learning deficits than wild-type mice; (2) if so, whether Abeta accumulation accounts for the excessive decline in learning ability; and (3) whether the learning deficits are reversible, even after significant Abeta deposition. At 4-6, 10-12, or 17-19 months of age, PDAPP and littermate wild-type mice on a C57BL/6 background were tested on a 5 week water maze protocol in which the location of the escape platform changed weekly, requiring the mice to repeatedly learn new information. PDAPP mice exhibited impaired spatial learning as early as 4 months (pre-Abeta deposition), and the performance of both wild-type and PDAPP mice declined with age. However, PDAPP mice exhibited significantly greater deterioration with age. Direct evidence for the role of Abeta accumulation in the age-related worsening in PDAPP mice was provided by the observation that systemic treatment over several weeks with the anti-Abeta antibody 10D5 reduced plaque deposition, increased plasma Abeta, improved hippocampal long-term potentiation, and improved behavioral performance in aged PDAPP mice with substantial Abeta burden.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0664-05.2005

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Crawley JN (2000) What's wrong with my mouse? Behavioral phenotyping of transgenic and knockout mice. In: Of unicorns and chimeras, Chap 2, Ed 1, pp 18 -20. New York: Wiley.
  2. Janus C, Pearson J, McLaurin J, Mathews PM, Jiang Y, Schmidt SD, Chishti MA, Horne P, Heslin D, French J, Mount HT, Nixon RA, Mercken M, Bergeron C, Fraser PE, St George-Hyslop P, Westaway D (2000) A beta peptide immunization reduces behavioural impairment and plaques in a model of Alzheimer's disease. Nature 408:979 -982.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hartman, R. E., Izumi, Y., Bales, K. R., Paul, S. M., Wozniak, D. F., & Holtzman, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2005-06-29
Volume
25
Issue
26
Pages
6213-6220
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1965214584
Cited by
147
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • National Institutes of Health (NS08803, AG13956, AG11355)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG11355, R01AG013956, R01AG018434, R37AG013956, AG13956, P01AG011355, AG18434)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA07261, T32DA007261)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P50NS008803, NS-08803)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta, anti-amyloid beta antibodies, amyloid-beta deposition, amyloid plaques, spatial learning deficits, hippocampal long-term potentiation, familial Alzheimer's disease, amyloid precursor protein, water maze, plasma amyloid-beta
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Hippocampus, Humans, Immunization, Learning Disabilities, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Long-Term Potentiation, Mice, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review