Cited by 65Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Absence of Prenatal Forebrain Defects in the Dp(16)1Yey/+ Mouse Model of down Syndrome.

Open access
Goodliffe, Joseph W., Olmos-Serrano, Jose Luis, Aziz, Nadine M., Pennings, Jeroen L.A., Guedj, Faycal, Bianchi, Diana W., Haydar, Tarik F.·2016·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Studies in humans with Down syndrome (DS) show that alterations in fetal brain development are followed by postnatal deficits in neuronal numbers, synaptic plasticity, and cognitive and motor function. This same progression is replicated in several mouse models of DS. Dp(16)1Yey/+ (hereafter called Dp16) is a recently developed mouse model of DS in which the entire region of mouse chromosome 16 that is homologous to human chromosome 21 has been triplicated. As such, Dp16 mice may more closely reproduce neurodevelopmental changes occurring in humans with DS. Here, we present the first comprehensive cellular and behavioral study of the Dp16 forebrain from embryonic to adult stages. Unexpectedly, our results demonstrate that Dp16 mice do not have prenatal brain defects previously reported in human fetal neocortex and in the developing forebrains of other mouse models, including microcephaly, reduced neurogenesis, and abnormal cell proliferation. Nevertheless, we found impairments in postnatal developmental milestones, fewer inhibitory forebrain neurons, and deficits in motor and cognitive performance in Dp16 mice. Therefore, although this new model does not express prenatal morphological phenotypes associated with DS, abnormalities in the postnatal period appear sufficient to produce significant cognitive deficits in Dp16. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Down syndrome (DS) leads to intellectual disability. Several mouse models have increased our understanding of the neuropathology of DS and are currently being used to test therapeutic strategies. A new mouse model that contains an expanded number of DS-related genes, known as Dp(16)1Yey/+ (Dp16), has been generated recently. We sought to determine whether the extended triplication creates a better phenocopy of DS-related brain pathologies. We measured embryonic development, forebrain maturation, and perinatal/adult behavior and revealed an absence of prenatal phenotypes in Dp16 fetal brain, but specific cellular and behavioral deficits after the first 2 postnatal weeks. These results uncover important differences in prenatal phenotype between Dp16 animals and humans with DS and other DS mouse models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2513-15.2016

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies indicate an increased ratio of inhibitory to excitatory neurons in the cortex and hippocampus in Dp16 mice that is associated with deficits in learning, memory, and motor function.

    “recent studies that indicate an increased ratio of inhibitory to excitatory neurons in the cortex and hippocampus in Dp16 mice that is associated with deficits in learning, memory, and motor function.”

    From Interferon signaling modulates Down syndrome-associated Alzheimer’s disease pathology in a mouse model (2025) · cites this paper as [44]

    The section on P15 neuronal populations reports fewer PV-positive and Sst-positive inhibitory interneurons in Dp16 somatosensory cortex, not an increased inhibitory-to-excitatory ratio; it attributes higher inhibition in cortex and hippocampus to prior findings in Ts65Dn mice. The Motor assessment and Cognitive assessment sections do report motor, learning, and memory deficits in Dp16 mice, but do not establish the claimed association with an increased ratio. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Dp16 mice exhibit hyperactive IFN signaling and recapitulate many phenotypes of DS including developmental delays, cranial malformations, and cognitive deficits.

    “Notably, Dp16 mice exhibit hyperactive IFN signaling and recapitulate many phenotypes of DS including developmental delays, cranial malformations, and cognitive deficits.38,40,42,43,44,45”

    From Interferon signaling modulates Down syndrome-associated Alzheimer’s disease pathology in a mouse model (2025) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Introduction reports craniofacial dysmorphology in Dp16 mice, and the paper reports delayed postnatal developmental milestones and impaired adult cognitive performance. Neither the supplied passages nor a search of our copy for IFN and interferon signaling supports the claim of hyperactive IFN signaling. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several commonly used cognitive tests employed here, including RAWM, rotarod, and the open field task, could be partially a function of non-neurological contributors to motor function that have been reported in Dp16 mice.

    “Several commonly used cognitive tests employed here, including RAWM, rotarod, and the open field task, could be partially a function of non-neurological contributors to motor function that have been reported in Dp16 mice.44”

    From Interferon signaling modulates Down syndrome-associated Alzheimer’s disease pathology in a mouse model (2025) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Motor assessment section (page not provided) reports reduced open-field locomotion, impaired hindlimb reflexes, and motor weakness in adult Dp16 mice. It does not identify non-neurological causes of those impairments or test whether they affect RAWM or rotarod performance; the proposed contribution to those tests remains an inference. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Dp(16)1Yey show no change in brain volume, NPC proliferation, neurogenesis, or neuronal density in the developing forebrain; Dp1Tyb show no changes in cerebellar anatomy.

    “No change in brain volume, NPC proliferation, neurogenesis, or neuronal density was identified in the developing forebrain (Goodliffe et al., 2016) nor any changes in cerebellar anatomy in Dp1Tyb (Watson-Scales et al., 2018).”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Goodliffe et al., 2016

    The sections on gross embryo and brain size, neural precursors, and neurogenesis report comparable prenatal forebrain dimensions, proliferation, and neuronal production in Dp16 and controls (page unavailable). They do not establish unchanged brain volume or prenatal neuronal density; the paper also reports changes in some cortical neuronal populations at P15. The Dp1Tyb cerebellum clause is attributed to Watson-Scales et al., not Goodliffe et al., and is outside this verdict. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Ts65Dn DS mouse model demonstrates embryonic and early postnatal gene expression, neuroanatomical, and developmental behavioral deficits like those observed in DS.

    “The Ts65Dn DS mouse model demonstrates embryonic and early postnatal gene expression, neuroanatomical, and developmental behavioral deficits like those observed in DS, whereas other DS models, including Dp1Yey and TcMAC21, do not have or have not yet been tested for these phenotypes (Aziz et al., 2018; Goodliffe et al., 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hill JM, Lim MA, Madeleine M Stone (2008) Neuromethods, vol. 39: Neu- ropeptide techniques. Totowa, NJ: Humana.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodliffe, J. W., Olmos-Serrano, J. L., Aziz, N. M., Pennings, J. L. A., Guedj, F., Bianchi, D. W., & Haydar, T. F.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
  • Tufts Medical Center (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2016-03-09
Volume
36
Issue
10
Pages
2926-2944
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2306947905
Cited by
65
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD05780)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
Down syndrome, forebrain development, postnatal neurodevelopment, inhibitory neurons, motor impairment, cognitive impairment, intellectual disability, mouse models of Down syndrome, neurodevelopmental disorders
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Brain, Developmental Disabilities, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16, Disease Models, Animal, Down Syndrome, Embryo, Mammalian, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Mutant Strains, Trisomy, Maze Learning, Craniofacial Abnormalities, Mice, Muscle Strength, Neurogenesis, Nestin, Spatial Memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review