Cited by 23Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsImmune Response and InflammationDNA Repair Mechanisms

DNA Repair Inhibition Leads to Active Export of Repetitive Sequences to the Cytoplasm Triggering an Inflammatory Response

Open access
Song, Xuan, Aw, Jacqueline T. M., Ma, Fulin, Cheung, Ming Fung, Leung, Danny, Herrup, Karl·2021·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Adult-onset neurodegenerative diseases are often accompanied by evidence of a chronic inflammation that includes activation of microglial cells and altered levels of brain cytokines. Aspects of this response are likely secondary reactions to neurodegeneration, but for many illnesses the inflammation may itself be an early and even causative disease event. In such cases, the inflammation is referred to as “sterile” as it occurs in the absence of an actual bacterial or viral pathogen. A potent trigger of sterile inflammation in CNS microglia has been shown to be the presence of DNA in the cytoplasm (cytoDNA) induced either by direct DNA damage or by inhibited DNA repair. We have shown that cytoDNA comes from the cell nucleus as a result of insufficient DNA damage repair. Using wild-type and Atm-/-mouse microglia, we extend these observations here by showing that its genomic origins are not random, but rather are heavily biased toward transcriptionally inactive, intergenic regions, in particular repetitive elements and AT-rich sequences. Once released from the genome, in both males and females, we show that cytoDNA is actively exported to the cytoplasm by a CRM1-dependent mechanism. In the cytoplasm, it is degraded either by a cytosolic exonuclease, Trex1, or an autophagy pathway that ends with degradation in the lysosome. Blocking the accumulation of cytoDNA prevents the emergence of the sterile inflammation reaction. These findings offer new insights into the emergence of sterile inflammation and offer novel approaches that may be of use in combatting a wide range of neurodegenerative conditions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Sterile inflammation describes a state where the defenses of the immune system are activated in the absence of a true pathogen. A potent trigger of this unorthodox response is the presence of DNA in the cytoplasm, which immune cells interpret as an invading virus or pathogen. We show that when DNA damage increases, fragments of the cell's own genome are actively exported to the cytoplasm where they are normally degraded. If this degradation is incomplete an immune reaction is triggered. Both age and stress increase DNA damage, and as age-related neurodegenerative diseases are frequently accompanied by a chronic low-level inflammation, strategies that reduce the induction of cytoplasmic DNA or speed its clearance become attractive therapeutic targets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0845-21.2021

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sequencing cytosolic DNA fragments from ATM-deficient microglia revealed that most were derived from nuclear DNA as intergenic repetitive elements, suggesting the source of cytosolic DNA may not be random.

    “Interestingly, sequencing the cytosolic DNA fragments from these microglia revealed that most were derived from the nuclear DNA as intergenic repetitive elements, suggesting that the source of cytosolic DNA may not be random (Song et al, 2021).”

    From Mechanisms of DNA damage-mediated neurotoxicity in neurodegenerative disease (2022) · cites this paper as Song et al, 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Song, X., Aw, J. T. M., Ma, F., Cheung, M. F., Leung, D., & Herrup, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2021-09-30
Volume
41
Issue
45
Pages
9286-9307
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W3203625903
Cited by
23
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (R9321)
  • Lo Ka Chung Charitable Foundation (The Hong Kong Epigenome Project)
  • Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (26104216, 16101315, 16124916, C6009-17G, AoE/M-604/16)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
Keywords
sterile inflammation, cytoplasmic DNA, DNA repair inhibition, microglia, repetitive DNA, AT-rich sequences, autophagy, Atm-deficient mice, neurodegenerative diseases, intergenic regions
MeSH terms
Animals, Cytoplasm, DNA, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Female, Inflammation, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Microglia, Mice, Knockout, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review