Cited by 148

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Parkinson's Disease-Associated LRRK2 Hyperactive Kinase Mutant Disrupts Synaptic Vesicle Trafficking in Ventral Midbrain Neurons

Pan, Ping-Yue, Li, Xianting, Wang, Jing, Powell, James, Wang, Qian, Zhang, Yuanxi, Chen, Zhaoyu, Wicinski, Bridget, Hof, Patrick, Ryan, Timothy A., Yue, Zhenyu·2017·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized pathologically by the selective loss of substantia nigra (SN) dopaminergic (DAergic) neurons. Recent evidence has suggested a role of LRRK2, linked to the most frequent familial PD, in regulating synaptic vesicle (SV) trafficking. However, the mechanism whereby LRRK2 mutants contribute to nigral vulnerability remains unclear. Here we show that the most common PD mutation LRRK2 G2019S impairs SV endocytosis in ventral midbrain (MB) neurons, including DA neurons, and the slowed endocytosis can be rescued by inhibition of LRRK2 kinase activity. A similar endocytic defect, however, was not observed in LRRK2 mutant neurons from the neocortex (hereafter, cortical neurons) or the hippocampus, suggesting a brain region-specific vulnerability to the G2019S mutation. Additionally, we found MB-specific impairment of SV endocytosis in neurons carrying heterozygous deletion of SYNJ1 ( PARK20 ), a gene that is associated with recessive Parkinsonism. Combining SYNJ1 +/− and LRRK2 G2019S does not exacerbate SV endocytosis but impairs sustained exocytosis in MB neurons and alters specific motor functions of 1-year-old male mice. Interestingly, we show that LRRK2 directly phosphorylates synaptojanin1 in vitro , resulting in the disruption of endophilin-synaptojanin1 interaction required for SV endocytosis. Our work suggests a merge of LRRK2 and SYNJ1 pathogenic pathways in deregulating SV trafficking in MB neurons as an underlying molecular mechanism of early PD pathogenesis. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Understanding midbrain dopaminergic (DAergic) neuron-selective vulnerability in PD is essential for the development of targeted therapeutics. We report, for the first time, a nerve terminal impairment in SV trafficking selectively in MB neurons but not cortical neurons caused by two PARK genes: LRRK2 (PARK8) and SYNJ1 (PARK20). We demonstrate that the enhanced kinase activity resulting from the most frequent G2019S mutation in LRRK2 is the key to this impairment. We provide evidence suggesting that LRRK2 G2019S and SYNJ1 loss of function share a similar pathogenic pathway in deregulating DAergic neuron SV endocytosis and that they play additive roles in facilitating each other's pathogenic functions in PD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0964-17.2017

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LRRK2 activity plays a role in synaptic vesicle endocytosis, activation of autophagy, and axonal transport of growth factor receptors.

    “LRRK2 activity plays a role in synaptic vesicle endocytosis, activation of autophagy, and axonal transport of growth factor receptors [2, 7, 10, 24, 25, 36, 51, 59, 62, 75, 77, 96].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.3389/fncir.2010.00018 · DOI
  2. 10.1242/jcs.158196 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.3389/fncel.2014.00301 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1093/hmg/ddu543 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1186/s13024-015-0066-z · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.01.019 · DOI
  7. 10.1074/jbc.274.45.32001 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.12.008 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81649-9 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nature05185 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.7554/eLife.05660 · DOI
  12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0036458 · DOI
  13. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3080-04.2004 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.1523708113 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/ana.21022 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nsmb.2570 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/hmg/ddw352 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/humu.22372 · DOI
  19. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3821-06.2006 · DOI
  20. 10.1073/pnas.0307813100 · DOI
  21. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5604-09.2010 · DOI
  22. 10.1073/pnas.1200575109 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.3389/neuro.04.003.2009 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.032 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.022 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.07.010 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.12.023 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s10048-014-0406-0 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.023 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/nn.3099 · DOI
  31. 10.1128/MCB.00914-13 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.05.016 · DOI
  33. 10.1002/humu.22373 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.04.031 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76468-X · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00667-6 · DOI
  37. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004485 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.02.015 · DOI
  39. 10.7554/eLife.12813 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1073/pnas.0906334106 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30203-4 · DOI
  42. 10.1074/jbc.M112.343418 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00644-5 · DOI
  44. 10.1073/pnas.0507360102 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3627-15.2016 · DOI
  46. 10.1073/pnas.1000738107 · DOI
  47. 10.1002/mds.23737 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.005 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pan, P.-Y., Li, X., Wang, J., Powell, J., Wang, Q., Zhang, Y., Chen, Z., Wicinski, B., Hof, P., Ryan, T. A., & Yue, Z.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2017-10-20
Volume
37
Issue
47
Pages
11366-11376
ISSN
  • 0270-6474
  • 1529-2401
Cited by
148
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review