Cited by 323Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsAutophagy in Disease and TherapyCellular transport and secretion

Synaptic, Mitochondrial, and Lysosomal Dysfunction in Parkinson’s Disease

Open access
Nguyen, Maria, Wong, Yvette C., Ysselstein, Daniel, Severino, Alex, Krainc, Dimitri·2019·Trends in Neurosciences

Abstract

The discovery of genetic forms of Parkinson's disease (PD) has highlighted the importance of the autophagy/lysosomal and mitochondrial/oxidative stress pathways in disease pathogenesis. However, recently identified PD-linked genes, including DNAJC6 (auxilin), SYNJ1 (synaptojanin 1), and the PD risk gene SH3GL2 (endophilin A1), have also highlighted disruptions in synaptic vesicle endocytosis (SVE) as a significant contributor to disease pathogenesis. Additionally, the roles of other PD genes such as LRRK2, PRKN, and VPS35 in the regulation of SVE are beginning to emerge. Here we discuss the recent work on the contribution of dysfunctional SVE to midbrain dopaminergic neurons' selective vulnerability and highlight pathways that demonstrate the interplay of synaptic, mitochondrial, and lysosomal dysfunction in the pathogenesis of PD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tins.2018.11.001

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, M., Wong, Y. C., Ysselstein, D., Severino, A., & Krainc, D.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Krainc, Dimitri
Venue
Trends in Neurosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
140-149
ISSN
0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2903418495
Cited by
323
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 18
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIH (2T32AG020506-16, K99 NS109252, T32 NS041234, R01 NS076054, R37 NS096241)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, synaptic vesicle endocytosis, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, DNAJC6, auxilin, SYNJ1, SH3GL2, endophilin A1, LRRK2, Parkin, VPS35, midbrain dopaminergic neurons, selective neuronal vulnerability, risk genes
MeSH terms
Leucine-Rich Repeat Serine-Threonine Protein Kinase-2, Animals, Autophagy, Dopamine, Endocytosis, Humans, Lysosomes, Mitochondria, Parkinson Disease, Synaptic Vesicles, Oxidative Stress, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, alpha-Synuclein, Dopaminergic Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review