Cited by 203Neuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyStress Responses and CortisolMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Corticotropin-releasing factor: long-lasting facilitation of the acoustic startle reflex

Open access
Liang, KC, Melia, KR, Miserendino, MJ, Falls, WA, Campeau, S, Davis, M·1992·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Intracerebroventricular infusion of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) (0.1–1.0 micrograms) produced a pronounced, dose-dependent enhancement of the acoustic startle reflex in rats. This excitatory effect began about 20–30 min after infusion, grew steadily over the 2 hr test period, and lasted at least 6 hr. Higher doses of CRF (10 micrograms) often produced marked facilitation and then inhibition of startle that oscillated repeatedly with a period of 10–20 min. CRF- enhanced startle did not result from an increase in sensitization produced by repetition of the startle stimulus or from a blockade of habituation. Peripheral injections of the autonomic ganglionic blockers hexamethonium (10 mg/kg) or chlorisondamine (3 mg/kg) slightly attenuated the magnitude of CRF-enhanced startle, suggesting a partial role of peripheral sympathetic activation. Intracerebroventricular infusion of the CRF antagonist alpha-helical CRF9–41 (alpha hCRF; 25 or 50 micrograms) blocked CRF-enhanced startle when infused 5 min prior to CRF, indicating a central site of action. CRF-enhanced startle also was reversed when alpha hCRF was given 90 min after infusion of CRF. This suggests that exogenously applied CRF remains in the brain for a very long time after administration or that CRF given exogenously initiates a process that results in a long-lasting activation of endogenous CRF. Because the startle reflex is elevated by both conditioned and unconditioned fear, these data lend further support to the idea that CRF infusion produces a behavioral state that resembles fear or anxiety. Because startle is mediated by a well-defined neural pathway, CRF-enhanced startle may provide a useful behavioral assay to analyze the neural systems upon which exogenous CRF acts to produce its behavioral effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.12-06-02303.1992

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After CRF infusion, startle rises from roughly 30 min, increases across a 2-h session, and persists for hours.

    “large, dose-dependent increases in startle amplitude that began ∼30 min after CRF infusion, grew steadily over the course of a 2-h test period, and lasted for several hours thereafter.”

    From Phasic vs Sustained Fear in Rats and Humans: Role of the Extended Amygdala in Fear vs Anxiety (2010) · cites this paper as Liang et al, 1992b

    The Results report a dose-dependent increase beginning about 30 minutes after infusion, and the Discussion says the effect lasted at least 6 hours. However, the Discussion places its maximum at about 80–90 minutes, so the claim that startle grew steadily throughout the 2-hour test overstates the time course. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pretreatment with the CRF antagonist α-helical CRF blocks CRF-induced startle increases, and delayed infusions of it reverse them.

    “These increases were prevented by pretreatment with α-helical CRF (αhCRF9–41), a CRF antagonist, and were reversed by delayed αhCRF9–41 infusions”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liang, K., Melia, K., Miserendino, M., Falls, W., Campeau, S., & Davis, M.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1992-06-01
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
2303-2312
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1637259485
Cited by
203
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Council
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns018033-06)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 25642, MH 47840, P01MH025642)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-18033)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
corticotropin-releasing factor, acoustic startle response, intracerebroventricular infusion, CRF antagonist, sympathetic activation, hexamethonium, chlorisondamine, fear, anxiety, startle habituation
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Ganglionic Blockers, Injections, Intraventricular, Male, Rats, Inbred Strains, Reflex, Startle, Time Factors, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review