Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 229

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Melanopsin and Rod–Cone Photoreceptors Play Different Roles in Mediating Pupillary Light Responses during Exposure to Continuous Light in Humans

Open access
Gooley, Joshua J., Ho Mien, Ivan, St. Hilaire, Melissa A., Yeo, Sing-Chen, Chua, Eric Chern-Pin, van Reen, Eliza, Hanley, Catherine J., Hull, Joseph T., Czeisler, Charles A., Lockley, Steven W.·2012·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

In mammals, the pupillary light reflex is mediated by intrinsically photosensitive melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells that also receive input from rod–cone photoreceptors. To assess the relative contribution of melanopsin and rod–cone photoreceptors to the pupillary light reflex in humans, we compared pupillary light responses in normally sighted individuals (n= 24) with a blind individual lacking rod–cone function. Here, we show that visual photoreceptors are required for normal pupillary responses to continuous light exposure at low irradiance levels, and for sustained pupillary constriction during exposure to light in the long-wavelength portion of the visual spectrum. In the absence of rod–cone function, pupillomotor responses are slow and sustained, and cannot track intermittent light stimuli, suggesting that rods/cones are required for encoding fast modulations in light intensity. In sighted individuals, pupillary constriction decreased monotonically for at least 30 min during exposure to continuous low-irradiance light, indicating that steady-state pupillary responses are an order of magnitude slower than previously reported. Exposure to low-irradiance intermittent green light (543 nm; 0.1–4 Hz) for 30 min, which was given to activate cone photoreceptors repeatedly, elicited sustained pupillary constriction responses that were more than twice as great compared with exposure to continuous green light. Our findings demonstrate nonredundant roles for rod–cone photoreceptors and melanopsin in mediating pupillary responses to continuous light. Moreover, our results suggest that it might be possible to enhance nonvisual light responses to low-irradiance exposures by using intermittent light to activate cone photoreceptors repeatedly in humans.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1321-12.2012

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 229

Metadata

Authors
Gooley, J. J., Ho Mien, I., St. Hilaire, M. A., Yeo, S.-C., Chua, E. C.-P., van Reen, E., Hanley, C. J., Hull, J. T., Czeisler, C. A., & Lockley, S. W.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-10-10
Volume
32
Issue
41
Pages
14242-14253
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2077759537
Cited by
229
References
6
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Melanopsin and Rod–Cone Photoreceptors Play Different Roles in Mediating Pupillary Light Responses during Exposure to Continuous Light in Humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.1321-12.2012
The paper
Gooley, J. J., Ho Mien, I., St. Hilaire, M. A., Yeo, S.-C., Chua, E. C.-P., van Reen, E., Hanley, C. J., Hull, J. T., Czeisler, C. A., & Lockley, S. W. (2012). Melanopsin and Rod–Cone Photoreceptors Play Different Roles in Mediating Pupillary Light Responses during Exposure to Continuous Light in Humans. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1321-12.2012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.