Cited by 252Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

State and Trait Components of Functional Connectivity: Individual Differences Vary with Mental State

Open access
Geerligs, Linda, Rubinov, Mikail, Cam-CAN, Henson, Richard N.·2015·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Resting-state functional connectivity, as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), is often treated as a trait, used, for example, to draw inferences about individual differences in cognitive function, or differences between healthy or diseased populations. However, functional connectivity can also depend on the individual's mental state. In the present study, we examined the relative contribution of state and trait components in shaping an individual's functional architecture. We used fMRI data from a large, population-based human sample (N= 587, age 18–88 years), as part of the Cambridge Centre for Aging and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN), which were collected in three mental states: resting, performing a sensorimotor task, and watching a movie. Whereas previous studies have shown commonalities across mental states in the average functional connectivity across individuals, we focused on the effects of states on the pattern of individual differences in functional connectivity. We found that state effects were as important as trait effects in shaping individual functional connectivity patterns, each explaining an approximately equal amount of variance. This was true when we looked at aging, as one specific dimension of individual differences, as well as when we looked at generic aspects of individual variation. These results show that individual differences in functional connectivity consist of state-dependent aspects, as well as more stable, trait-like characteristics. Studying individual differences in functional connectivity across a wider range of mental states will therefore provide a more complete picture of the mechanisms underlying factors such as cognitive ability, aging, and disease. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The brain's functional architecture is remarkably similar across different individuals and across different mental states, which is why many studies use functional connectivity as a trait measure. Despite these trait-like aspects, functional connectivity varies over time and with changes in cognitive state. We measured connectivity in three different states to quantify the size of the trait-like component of functional connectivity, compared with the state-dependent component. Our results show that studying individual differences within one state (such as resting) uncovers only part of the relevant individual differences in brain function, and that the study of functional connectivity under multiple mental states is essential to disentangle connectivity differences that are transient versus those that represent more stable, trait-like characteristics of an individual.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1324-15.2015

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When people engage in certain tasks, the neural features predominantly represent the state effect rather than the long-term trait effect.

    “When people engage in certain tasks, the neural features predominantly represented the state effect, rather than the long-term trait effect (Geerligs et al., 2015), which was the breathing training effect in our case.”

    From Frontal Electroencephalography Asymmetry and Desynchronized Functional Connectivity Associated with Long-Term and Short-Term Breathing Training (2026) · cites this paper as Geerligs et al., 2015

    The Discussion reports that mental state strongly shaped individual differences in functional connectivity, with state effects explaining as much or more variance than trait effects in the general analysis. But the source does not establish that state effects predominantly outweigh trait effects whenever people engage in tasks: for aging in the rest-versus-sensorimotor comparison, state effects accounted for 39% of explained variance. Its findings concern functional connectivity, not neural features generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Alexander-Bloch AF, Gogtay N, Meunier D, Birn R, Clasen L, Lalonde F, Lenroot R, Giedd J, Bullmore ET (2010) Disrupted modularity and local connectivity of brain functional networks in childhood-onset schizophre- nia. Front Syst Neurosci 4:147. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ashburner J (2007) A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage 38:95-113. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ashburner J, Friston KJ (2005) Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 26:839 - 851. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  4. Barnes A, Bullmore ET, Suckling J (2009) Endogenous human brain dy- namics recover slowly following cognitive effort. PLoS One 4:e6626. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  5. Bassett DS, Wymbs NF, Porter MA, Mucha PJ, Carlson JM, Grafton ST (2011) Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learn- ing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:7641-7646. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  6. Beckmann CF, DeLuca M, Devlin JT, Smith SM (2005) Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis. Philos Trans Biol Sci 360:1001-1013. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  7. Brier MR, Thomas JB, Fagan AM, Hassenstab J, Holtzman DM, Benzinger TL, Morris JC, Ances BM (2014) Functional connectivity and graph the- ory in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 35:757-768. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  8. Calhoun VD, Kiehl KA, Pearlson GD (2008) Modulation of temporally co- herent brain networks estimated using ICA at rest and during cognitive tasks. Hum Brain Mapp 29:828 -838. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cole MW, Bassett DS, Power JD, Braver TS, Petersen SE (2014) Intrinsic and task-evoked network architectures of the human brain. Neuron 83: 238 -251. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  10. Craddock RC, James GA, Holtzheimer PE 3rd, Hu XP, Mayberg HS (2012) A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clus- tering. Hum Brain Mapp 33:1914 -1928. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  11. Damoiseaux JS, Rombouts SA, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Stam CJ, Smith SM, Beckmann CF (2006) Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:13848 -13853. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  12. D'Esposito M, Deouell LY, Gazzaley A (2003) Alterations in the BOLD fMRI signal with ageing and disease: a challenge for neuroimaging. Nat Rev 4:863-872. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  13. Di X, Gohel S, Kim EH, Biswal BB (2013) Task vs. rest-different network configurations between the coactivation and the resting-state brain net- works. Front Hum Neurosci 7:493. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  14. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) "Mini mental state." A prac- tical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189 -198. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  15. Geerligs L, Maurits NM, Renken RJ, Lorist MM (2014) Reduced specificity of functional connectivity in the aging brain during task performance. Hum Brain Mapp 35:319 -330. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  16. Geerligs L, Renken RJ, Saliasi E, Maurits NM, Lorist MM (2015) A brain wide study of age-related changes in functional connectivity. Cereb Cor- tex 25:1987-1999. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  17. Gonzalez-Castillo J, Hoy CW, Handwerker DA, Robinson ME, Buchanan LC, Saad ZS, Bandettini PA (2015) Tracking ongoing cognition in individ- uals using whole-brain functional connectivity patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:8762-8767. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  18. Hermundstad AM, Brown KS, Bassett DS, Aminoff EM, Frithsen A, Johnson A, Tipper CM, Miller MB, Grafton ST, Carlson JM (2014) Structurally- constrained relationships between cognitive states in the human brain. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003591. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  19. Hutchison RM, Womelsdorf T, Allen EA, Bandettini PA, Calhoun VD, Cor- betta M, Della Penna S, Duyn JH, Glover GH, Gonzalez-Castillo J, Handwerker DA, Keilholz S, Kiviniemi V, Leopold DA, de Pasquale F, Sporns O, Walter M, Chang C (2013) Dynamic functional connectivity: promise, issues, and interpretations. Neuroimage. 80:360 -378. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kitzbichler MG, Henson RN, Smith ML, Nathan PJ, Bullmore ET (2011) Cognitive effort drives workspace configuration of human brain func- tional networks. J Neurosci 31:8259 -8270. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  21. Lancichinetti A, Fortunato S (2012) Consensus clustering in complex net- works. Sci Rep 2:336. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  22. Lu H, Xu F, Rodrigue KM, Kennedy KM, Cheng Y, Flicker B, Hebrank AC, Uh J, Park DC (2011) Alterations in cerebral metabolic rate and blood sup- ply across the adult lifespan. Cereb Cortex 21:1426 -1434. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  23. Mennes M, Kelly C, Colcombe S, Castellanos FX, Milham MP (2013) The extrinsic and intrinsic functional architectures of the human brain are not equivalent. Cereb Cortex 23:223-229. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  24. Moussa MN, Vechlekar CD, Burdette JH, Steen MR, Hugenschmidt CE, Lau- rienti PJ (2011) Changes in cognitive state alter human functional brain networks. Front Hum Neurosci 5:83. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  25. Patel AX, Kundu P, Rubinov M, Jones PS, Ve ´rtes PE, Ersche KD, Suckling J, Bullmore ET (2014) A wavelet method for modeling and despiking mo- tion artifacts from resting-state fMRI time series. Neuroimage 95:287- 304. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  26. Power JD, Mitra A, Laumann TO, Snyder AZ, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE (2014) Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 84:320 -341. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  27. Power JD, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE (2015) Recent progress and outstand- ing issues in motion correction in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 105: 536 -551. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  28. Prichard D, Theiler J (1994) Generating surrogate data for time series with several simultaneously measured variables. Phys Rev Lett 73:951-954. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  29. Reichardt J, Bornholdt S (2006) Statistical mechanics of community detec- tion. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Matter Phys 74:016110. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  30. Sanz-Arigita EJ, Schoonheim MM, Damoiseaux JS, Rombouts SA, Maris E, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Stam CJ (2010) Loss of "small-world" networks in Alzheimer's disease: graph analysis of FMRI resting-state functional connectivity. PLoS One 5:e13788. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  31. Satterthwaite TD, Elliott MA, Gerraty RT, Ruparel K, Loughead J, Calkins ME, Eickhoff SB, Hakonarson H, Gur RC, Gur RE, Wolf DH (2013) An improved framework for confound regression and filtering for control of motion artifact in the preprocessing of resting-state functional connectiv- ity data. Neuroimage 64:240 -256. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  32. Shafto MA, Tyler LK, Dixon M, Taylor JR, Rowe JB, Cusack R, Calder AJ, Marslen-Wilson WD, Duncan J, Dalgleish T, Henson RN, Brayne C, Mat- thews FE (2014) The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) study protocol: a cross-sectional, lifespan, multidisciplinary examination of healthy cognitive ageing. BMC Neurol 14:204. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  33. Shirer WR, Ryali S, Rykhlevskaia E, Menon V, Greicius MD (2012) Decod- ing subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity pat- terns. Cereb Cortex 22:158 -165. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  34. Smith SM, Fox PT, Miller KL, Glahn DC, Fox PM, Mackay CE, Filippini N, Watkins KE, Toro R, Laird AR, Beckmann CF (2009) Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:13040 -13045. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  35. Sun Y, Danila B, Josic ´K, Bassler KE (2009) Improved community structure detection using a modified fine-tuning strategy. Europhys Lett 86:28004. CrossRef · DOI
  36. Tomasi D, Volkow ND (2012) Aging and functional brain networks. Mol Psychiatry 17:549 -558. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  37. Tsvetanov KA, Henson RN, Tyler LK, Davis SW, Shafto MA, Taylor JR, Williams N, Cam-Can, Rowe JB (2015) The effect of ageing on fMRI: correction for the confounding effects of vascular reactivity evaluated by joint fMRI and MEG in 335 adults. Hum Brain Mapp 36:2248 -2269. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  38. Uddin LQ, Supekar K, Menon V (2010) Typical and atypical development of functional human brain networks: insights from resting-state FMRI. Front Syst Neurosci 4:21. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  39. Van Essen DC, Drury HA, Dickson J, Harwell J, Hanlon D, Anderson CH (2001) An integrated software suite for surface-based analyses of cerebral cortex. J Am Med Inform Assoc 8:443-459. CrossRef Medline · DOI
  40. Yan CG, Cheung B, Kelly C, Colcombe S, Craddock RC, Di Martino A, Li Q, Zuo XN, Castellanos FX, Milham MP (2013) A comprehensive assess- ment of regional variation in the impact of head micromovements on functional connectomics. Neuroimage 76:183-201. CrossRef Medline · DOI · Paper page
  41. Zeng LL, Wang D, Fox MD, Sabuncu M, Hu D, Ge M, Buckner RL, Liu H (2014) Neurobiological basis of head motion in brain imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:6058 -6062. CrossRef Medline · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geerligs, L., Rubinov, M., Cam-CAN, & Henson, R. N.
Affiliations
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2015-10-14
Volume
35
Issue
41
Pages
13949-13961
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2173585941
Cited by
252
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 1
FWCI
14.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • Wellcome Trust (103838/Z/14/Z)
  • Isaac Newton Trust
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Medical Research Council (MC-A060-5PR10, BB/H008217/1)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/H008217/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
resting-state functional connectivity, individual differences, mental states, aging, sensorimotor tasks, film viewing, brain functional architecture, Cam-CAN
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Individuality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Pathways, Oxygen, Rest, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review