Cited by 604Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reduced Striatal Dopamine Transporter Density in Abstinent Methamphetamine and Methcathinone Users: Evidence from Positron Emission Tomography Studies with [11C]WIN-35,428

Open access

Abstract

Methamphetamine and methcathinone are psychostimulant drugs with high potential for abuse. In animals, methamphetamine and related drugs are known to damage brain dopamine (DA) neurons, and this damage has recently been shown to be detectable in living nonhuman primates by means of positron emission tomography (PET) with [11C]WIN-35,428, a DA transporter (DAT) ligand. The present studies determined whether living humans with a history of methamphetamine or methcathinone abuse showed evidence of lasting decrements in brain DAT density. PET studies were performed in 10 control subjects, six abstinent methamphetamine users, four abstinent methcathinone users, and three patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). On average, subjects had abstained from amphetamine use for approximately 3 years. Before PET studies, all subjects underwent urine and blood toxicology screens to rule out recent drug use. Compared with controls, abstinent methamphetamine and methcathinone users had significant decreases in DAT density in the caudate nucleus (-23 and -24%, respectively) and putamen (-25 and -16%, respectively). Larger decreases in DAT density were evident in patients with PD (47 and 68% in caudate and putamen, respectively). Neither methamphetamine nor methcathinone users showed clinical signs of parkinsonism. Persistent reductions of DAT density in methamphetamine and methcathinone users are suggestive of loss of DAT or loss of DA terminals and raise the possibility that as these individuals age, they may be at increased risk for the development of parkinsonism or neuropsychiatric conditions in which brain DA neurons have been implicated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.18-20-08417.1998

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Brill, 1969, The rise and fall of a methamphetamine epidemic., Semin Psychiatry, 1, 179
  2. Lukas SE (1997) Proceedings of the national consensus meeting on the use, abuse and sequelae of abuse of methamphetamine with implications for prevention, treatment and research. DHHS Publication SMA. 96–8013. (USDHHS, Rockville, MD).
  3. Melega, 1993, FDOPA-PET studies show neurotoxic effects of low-dose amphetamine in monkeys., Soc Neurosci Abstr, 19, 822
  4. Tolliver, 1995, Methcathinone: a new amphetamine-like drug of abuse., Natl Inst Drug Abuse Res Monogr Ser, 153, 406
  5. U.S Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration (1994) Methcathinone (CAT). Drug intelligence bulletin. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, February.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McCann, U. D., Wong, D. F., Yokoi, F., Villemagne, V., Dannals, R. F., & Ricaurte, G. A.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1998-10-15
Volume
18
Issue
20
Pages
8417-8422
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2106287416
Cited by
602
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 34
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da009482-05, 5r01da006275-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (F32DA005707, DA05707, DA09482, DA-06275, R01DA005707)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
methamphetamine, methcathinone, amphetamine abuse, dopamine transporter density, striatum, caudate nucleus, putamen, dopamine neuron loss, Parkinson's disease, psychostimulants, neurotoxicity
MeSH terms
Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Brain Chemistry, Carbon Radioisotopes, Carrier Proteins, Cocaine, Female, Humans, Male, Membrane Glycoproteins, Methamphetamine, Middle Aged, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Parkinson Disease, Secondary, Propiophenones, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Neostriatum, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, Amphetamine-Related Disorders, Membrane Transport Proteins, Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review