Cited by 270EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesSport Psychology and PerformanceNeural dynamics and brain function

EEG-neurofeedback for optimising performance. III: A review of methodological and theoretical considerations

Gruzelier, John H.·2014·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

In continuing this three-part review on validation of EEG-neurofeedback for optimal performance evidence is first provided for feedback influences on the CNS, the integration of EEG with fMRI methodology as well as anatomical correlates. Then whereas Parts I and II reviewed the considerable behavioural outcome gains and evidence for their feedback causation, part III lays bare the not inconsiderable methodological and theoretical conundrums. Cardinal assumptions amongst practitioners about specificity of topography, behavioural outcome and frequency bands are critically examined. The hitherto mostly neglected nature of feedback learning is reviewed including evidence of within- and between-session and successive baseline learning; the enduring impact on the tonic EEG; implications for experimental design, individual differences and the trainer-participant interface; distinguishing between the learning and mastery of self-regulation; connectivity, ratio, unidirectional and multimodal feedback protocols. A thorough grounding in human neuroscience plus interpersonal skills are considered prerequisites for scientific advancement and ethically sound practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.03.015

Cites

150 of 150 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 151 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gruzelier, J. H.
Affiliations
Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Gruzelier, John H.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
44
Pages
159-182
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982263033
Cited by
270
References
151
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
neurofeedback, performance optimization, feedback learning, self-regulation, EEG-fMRI integration, anatomical correlates, individual differences, neuroethics
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Humans, Individuality, Psychomotor Performance, Social Control, Informal, Brain Waves, Neurofeedback

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review