The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Perimotor Framework Reveals Functional Segmentation in the Motoneuronal Network Controlling Locomotion in Caenorhabditis elegans
Open accessAbstract
The neuronal connectivity dataset of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans attracts wide attention from computational neuroscientists and experimentalists. However, the dataset is incomplete. The ventral and dorsal nerve cords of a single nematode were reconstructed halfway along the body and the posterior data are missing, leaving 21 of 75 motoneurons of the locomotor network with partial or no connectivity data. Using a new framework for network analysis, the perimotor space, we identified rules of connectivity that allowed us to approximate the missing data by extrapolation. Motoneurons were mapped into perimotor space in which each motoneuron is located according to the muscle cells it innervates. In this framework, a pattern of iterative connections emerges which includes most (0.90) of the connections. We identified a repeating unit consisting of 12 motoneurons and 12 muscle cells. The cell bodies of the motoneurons of such a unit are not necessarily anatomical neighbors and there is no obvious anatomical segmentation. A connectivity model, composed of six repeating units, is a description of the network that is both simplified (modular and without noniterative connections) and more complete (includes the posterior part) than the original dataset. The perimotor framework of observed connectivity and the segmented connectivity model give insights and advance the study of the neuronal infrastructure underlying locomotion in C. elegans. Furthermore, we suggest that the tools used herein may be useful to interpret, simplify, and represent connectivity data of other motor systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The most anterior instance aligns perfectly with the perimotor segmentation proposed by Haspel & O'Donovan (2011), but the other two do not: they include neurons across adjacent units of the VNC.
“although the most anterior instance aligns perfectly with the perimotor segmentation proposed by (Haspel & O’Donovan, 2011), the other two do not: they include neurons across adjacent units of the VNC”
From Potential role of a ventral nerve cord central pattern generator in forward and backward locomotion in Caenorhabditis elegans (2018) · cites this paper as Haspel & O’Donovan, 2011
A statistical analysis by Haspel & O'Donovan revealed a repeating neural unit along the VNC comprising 2 DA, 1 DB, 2 AS, 2 VD, 2 VA, and 1 DD motorneurons, connected by chemical synapses and gap junctions.
“a statistical analysis by Haspel & O’Donovan of the motorneurons in relation to the position of the muscles they innervate revealed a repeating neural unit along the VNC (Haspel & O’Donovan, 2011). Their statistical analysis resulted in a repeating neural unit comprising 2 DA, 1 DB, 2 AS, 2 VD, 2VA, and 1 DD motorneurons, connected by a set of chemical synapses (→) and gap junctions (|—|) (Figure”
From Potential role of a ventral nerve cord central pattern generator in forward and backward locomotion in Caenorhabditis elegans (2018) · cites this paper as Haspel & O’Donovan, 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N., & Brenner, S. (1986) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1986.0056 · Cited by 5,589 · cited 9×
“This may be due to an edge effect, their different morphology (White et al., 1976, 1986), or both.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialStructural Properties of the Caenorhabditis elegans Neuronal Network
Varshney, L. R., Chen, B. L., Paniagua, E., Hall, D. H., & Chklovskii, D. B. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001066 · Cited by 867
Micheva, K. D., & Smith, S. J. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.014 · Cited by 787
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- 10.1016/j.physa.2005.12.013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000748 · DOI
- Bryden JA Cohen N (2004) Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior A simulation model of the locomotion controllers for the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans , eds Schaal S Ijspeert AJ Billard A Vijayakumar S Hallam J Meyer JA (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp 183–192. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00422-008-0212-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrn2575 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature06292 · DOI
- Chalfie, 1985, The neural circuit for touch sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans, J Neurosci, 5, 956, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-04-00956.1985 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0506806103 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3408-08.2009 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0031182000077921 · DOI
- 10.1002/dneu.20589 · DOI
- 10.1242/dev.01883 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0409009101 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2244-10.2010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020095 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10827-007-0054-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0503610102 · DOI
- Katz, 2010, NeuronBank: a tool for cataloging neuronal circuitry, Front Syst Neurosci, 4, 9
- 10.1016/S0166-2236(02)02038-6 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000041 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000032 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.298.5594.824 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tree.2004.06.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0378-4371(01)00266-7 · DOI
- Newman ME Girvan M (2004) Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 69:026113. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82149-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0025-5564(93)90033-7 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5765-09.2010 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0017013 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.conb.2009.09.009 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020369 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.75.7.3493 · DOI
- 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90201-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001044 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0074-7742(05)69005-8 · DOI
- 10.1038/30918 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rstb.1976.0086 · DOI · Paper page
- Yakovenko, 2002, Spatiotemporal activation of lumbosacral motoneurons in the locomotor step cycle, J Neurophysiol, 87, 1542, 10.1152/jn.00479.2001 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Connecting a Connectome to Behavior: An Ensemble of Neuroanatomical Models of C. elegans Klinotaxis
Izquierdo, E. J., & Beer, R. D. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002890 · Cited by 84
“Current theoretical and experimental studies are aimed at estimating and reconstructing missing data [90], [91].”
BackgroundFrom head to tail: a neuromechanical model of forward locomotion in Caenorhabditis elegans
Izquierdo, E. J., & Beer, R. D. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0374 · Cited by 56
Olivares, E. O., Izquierdo, E. J., & Beer, R. D. (2018) · Network Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/netn_a_00036 · Cited by 38
The whole worm: brain–body–environment models of C. elegans
Izquierdo, E. J., & Beer, R. D. (2016) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2016.06.005 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Haspel, G., & O'Donovan, M. J.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2011-10-12
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 14611-14623
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC3221003
- OpenAlex
- W2144968754
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (ZIANS002787)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- Caenorhabditis elegans, locomotion, motor neurons, neuronal connectivity, network partitioning, connectivity model, muscle innervation, ventral nerve cord, dorsal nerve cord, modular network architecture
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Locomotion, Models, Neurological, Motor Neurons, Muscles, Nerve Net, Synapses, Caenorhabditis elegans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review