Cited by 43Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchMotor Control and AdaptationNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Perimotor Framework Reveals Functional Segmentation in the Motoneuronal Network Controlling Locomotion in Caenorhabditis elegans

Open access
Haspel, Gal, O'Donovan, Michael J.·2011·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The neuronal connectivity dataset of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans attracts wide attention from computational neuroscientists and experimentalists. However, the dataset is incomplete. The ventral and dorsal nerve cords of a single nematode were reconstructed halfway along the body and the posterior data are missing, leaving 21 of 75 motoneurons of the locomotor network with partial or no connectivity data. Using a new framework for network analysis, the perimotor space, we identified rules of connectivity that allowed us to approximate the missing data by extrapolation. Motoneurons were mapped into perimotor space in which each motoneuron is located according to the muscle cells it innervates. In this framework, a pattern of iterative connections emerges which includes most (0.90) of the connections. We identified a repeating unit consisting of 12 motoneurons and 12 muscle cells. The cell bodies of the motoneurons of such a unit are not necessarily anatomical neighbors and there is no obvious anatomical segmentation. A connectivity model, composed of six repeating units, is a description of the network that is both simplified (modular and without noniterative connections) and more complete (includes the posterior part) than the original dataset. The perimotor framework of observed connectivity and the segmented connectivity model give insights and advance the study of the neuronal infrastructure underlying locomotion in C. elegans. Furthermore, we suggest that the tools used herein may be useful to interpret, simplify, and represent connectivity data of other motor systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2186-11.2011

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most anterior instance aligns perfectly with the perimotor segmentation proposed by Haspel & O'Donovan (2011), but the other two do not: they include neurons across adjacent units of the VNC.

    “although the most anterior instance aligns perfectly with the perimotor segmentation proposed by (Haspel & O’Donovan, 2011), the other two do not: they include neurons across adjacent units of the VNC”
  • A statistical analysis by Haspel & O'Donovan revealed a repeating neural unit along the VNC comprising 2 DA, 1 DB, 2 AS, 2 VD, 2 VA, and 1 DD motorneurons, connected by chemical synapses and gap junctions.

    “a statistical analysis by Haspel & O’Donovan of the motorneurons in relation to the position of the muscles they innervate revealed a repeating neural unit along the VNC (Haspel & O’Donovan, 2011). Their statistical analysis resulted in a repeating neural unit comprising 2 DA, 1 DB, 2 AS, 2 VD, 2VA, and 1 DD motorneurons, connected by a set of chemical synapses (→) and gap junctions (|—|) (Figure”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1016/j.physa.2005.12.013 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000748 · DOI
  3. Bryden JA Cohen N (2004) Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior A simulation model of the locomotion controllers for the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans , eds Schaal S Ijspeert AJ Billard A Vijayakumar S Hallam J Meyer JA (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp 183–192. · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1007/s00422-008-0212-6 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/nrn2575 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/nature06292 · DOI
  7. Chalfie, 1985, The neural circuit for touch sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans, J Neurosci, 5, 956, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-04-00956.1985 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1073/pnas.0506806103 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3408-08.2009 · DOI
  10. 10.1017/S0031182000077921 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/dneu.20589 · DOI
  12. 10.1242/dev.01883 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.0409009101 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2244-10.2010 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020095 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s10827-007-0054-6 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1073/pnas.0503610102 · DOI
  18. Katz, 2010, NeuronBank: a tool for cataloging neuronal circuitry, Front Syst Neurosci, 4, 9
  19. 10.1016/S0166-2236(02)02038-6 · DOI
  20. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000041 · DOI
  21. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000032 · DOI
  22. 10.1126/science.298.5594.824 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.tree.2004.06.007 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0378-4371(01)00266-7 · DOI
  25. Newman ME Girvan M (2004) Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 69:026113. · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82149-X · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/0025-5564(93)90033-7 · DOI
  28. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5765-09.2010 · DOI
  29. 10.1371/journal.pone.0017013 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.conb.2009.09.009 · DOI
  31. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020369 · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.75.7.3493 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90201-4 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001044 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0074-7742(05)69005-8 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/30918 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1098/rstb.1976.0086 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Yakovenko, 2002, Spatiotemporal activation of lumbosacral motoneurons in the locomotor step cycle, J Neurophysiol, 87, 1542, 10.1152/jn.00479.2001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Haspel, G., & O'Donovan, M. J.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2011-10-12
Volume
31
Issue
41
Pages
14611-14623
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2144968754
Cited by
43
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (ZIANS002787)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
Caenorhabditis elegans, locomotion, motor neurons, neuronal connectivity, network partitioning, connectivity model, muscle innervation, ventral nerve cord, dorsal nerve cord, modular network architecture
MeSH terms
Animals, Locomotion, Models, Neurological, Motor Neurons, Muscles, Nerve Net, Synapses, Caenorhabditis elegans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review