Cited by 159Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingCellular transport and secretion

Presynaptic Terminals Independently Regulate Synaptic Clustering and Autophagy of GABAAReceptors in Caenorhabditis elegans

Open access
Rowland, Aaron M., Richmond, Janet E., Olsen, Jason G., Hall, David H., Bamber, Bruce A.·2006·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Synaptic clustering of GABAA receptors is important for the function of inhibitory synapses, influencing synapse strength and, consequently, the balance of excitation and inhibition in the brain. Presynaptic terminals are known to induce GABAA receptor clustering during synaptogenesis, but the mechanisms of cluster formation and maintenance are not known. To study how presynaptic neurons direct the formation of GABAA receptor clusters, we have investigated GABAA receptor localization in postsynaptic cells that fail to receive presynaptic contacts in Caenorhabditis elegans. Postsynaptic muscles in C. elegans receive acetylcholine and GABA motor innervation, and GABAA receptors cluster opposite GABA terminals. Selective loss of GABA inputs caused GABAA receptors to be diffusely distributed at or near the muscle cell surface, confirming that GABA presynaptic terminals induce GABAA receptor clustering. In contrast, selective loss of acetylcholine innervation had no effect on GABAA receptor localization. However, loss of both GABA and acetylcholine inputs together caused GABAA receptors to traffic to intracellular autophagosomes. Autophagosomes normally transport bulk cytoplasm to the lysosome for degradation. However, we show that GABAA receptors traffic to autophagosomes after endocytic removal from the cell surface and that acetylcholine receptors in the same cells do not traffic to autophagosomes. Thus, autophagy can degrade cell-surface receptors and can do so selectively. Our results show that presynaptic terminals induce GABAA receptor clustering by independently controlling synaptic localization and surface stability of GABAA receptors. They also demonstrate a novel function for autophagy in GABAA receptor degradative trafficking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2279-05.2006

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Autophagy may remodel dendritic spines by directing internalized postsynaptic membrane neurotransmitter receptors, including GABA-A and AMPAR, toward lysosomal degradation.

    “Autophagy may remodel dendritic spines by directing internalized postsynaptic membrane neurotransmitter receptors, including GABA-A (Rowland et al., 2006) and AMPAR (Shehata et al., 2012), toward lysosomal degradation.”

    From Loss of mTOR-Dependent Macroautophagy Causes Autistic-like Synaptic Pruning Deficits (2014) · cites this paper as Rowland et al., 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rowland, A. M., Richmond, J. E., Olsen, J. G., Hall, D. H., & Bamber, B. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2006-02-08
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
1711-1720
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2066358591
Cited by
159
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Whitehall Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (1r21mh064699-01, R24OD010943)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH64699)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM007464, T32GM007464)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS43345, R01NS043345, R01NS041477, NS041477)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR12596, R24RR012596)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
GABAA receptor, synaptic clustering, presynaptic terminals, autophagy, autophagosomes, receptor degradation, Caenorhabditis elegans, inhibitory synapses, acetylcholine receptor, receptor trafficking, synaptogenesis, excitation-inhibition balance
MeSH terms
Animals, Autophagy, Axons, Motor Neurons, Neuromuscular Junction, Receptors, GABA-A, Synapses, Transfection, Caenorhabditis elegans, Presynaptic Terminals, Genes, Reporter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review