Cited by 550Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Decreased GABAA-receptor clustering results in enhanced anxiety and a bias for threat cues

Crestani, Florence, Lorez, Matthias, Baer, Kristin, Essrich, Christian, Benke, Dietmar, Laurent, Jean Paul, Belzung, Catherine, Fritschy, Jean-Marc +2 more·1999·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Patients with panic disorders show a deficit of GABAA receptors in the hippocampus, parahippocampus and orbitofrontal cortex. Synaptic clustering of GABAA receptors in mice heterozygous for the gamma2 subunit was reduced, mainly in hippocampus and cerebral cortex. The gamma2 +/- mice showed enhanced behavioral inhibition toward natural aversive stimuli and heightened responsiveness in trace fear conditioning and ambiguous cue discrimination learning. Implicit and spatial memory as well as long-term potentiation in hippocampus were unchanged. Thus gamma2 +/- mice represent a model of anxiety characterized by harm avoidance behavior and an explicit memory bias for threat cues, resulting in heightened sensitivity to negative associations. This model implicates GABAA-receptor dysfunction in patients as a causal predisposition to anxiety disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/12207

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Global heterozygous knockdown of the γ2 subunit leads to impaired GABAergic signaling.

    “Global heterozygous knockdown of the γ2 subunit leads to impaired GABAergic signaling [11 ], as well as anxiety- and despair-like behavior that is reversed with chronic desipramine (but not fluoxetine) [127] and acute ketamine [126] treatment.”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [11]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crestani, F., Lorez, M., Baer, K., Essrich, C., Benke, D., Laurent, J. P., Belzung, C., Fritschy, J.-M., Lüscher, B., & Mohler, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Université de Tours (FR)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
1999-09
Volume
2
Issue
9
Pages
833-839
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W1602497443
Cited by
550
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 25
FWCI
12.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
gamma2 subunit, anxiety, panic disorder, harm avoidance, trace fear conditioning, hippocampus, negative association
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Avoidance Learning, Conditioning, Operant, Cues, Fear, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Heterozygote, Hippocampus, Memory, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Inbred Strains, Neurons, Receptors, GABA-A, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Maze Learning, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review