Cited by 488Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors

Insulin Receptor Substrate-2 Deficiency Impairs Brain Growth and Promotes Tau Phosphorylation

Open access
Schubert, Markus, Brazil, Derek P., Burks, Deborah J., Kushner, Jake A., Ye, Jing, Flint, Carrie L., Farhang-Fallah, Janet, Dikkes, Pieter +4 more·2003·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Insulin resistance and diabetes might promote neurodegenerative disease, but a molecular link between these disorders is unknown. Many factors are responsible for brain growth, patterning, and survival, including the insulin-insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-signaling cascades that are mediated by tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate (IRS) proteins. Irs2 signaling mediates peripheral insulin action and pancreatic beta-cell function, and its failure causes diabetes in mice. In this study, we reveal two important roles for Irs2 signaling in the mouse brain. First, disruption of the Irs2 gene reduced neuronal proliferation during development by 50%, which dissociated brain growth from Irs1-dependent body growth. Second, neurofibrillary tangles containing phosphorylated tau accumulated in the hippocampus of old Irs2 knock-out mice, suggesting that Irs2 signaling is neuroprotective. Thus, dysregulation of the Irs2 branch of the insulin-Igf-signaling cascade reveals a molecular link between diabetes and neurodegenerative disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.23-18-07084.2003

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This astrocyte subcluster was enriched for genes involved in extracellular matrix organization, metabolic support, and inflammatory modulation.

    “This subcluster was enriched for genes involved in extracellular matrix organization [102, 135, 136], metabolic support [135, 137], and inflammatory modulation [138–141].”

    From Tau Ablation Rewires Brain Cell Programs in Health and Restores Function in Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [137]

    The Introduction mentions extracellular matrix proteins as factors in brain development, and the brain-growth results report GFAP staining of astrocytes. Neither passage identifies an astrocyte subcluster or reports enrichment of genes for extracellular matrix organization or metabolic support. Searches for those terms found no passage addressing the attributed finding; the inflammatory-modulation clause has separate citations in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Finch CE, Cohen DM (1997) Aging, metabolism, and Alzheimer disease: review and hypotheses. Exp Neurol 143:82-102.
  2. Hoyer S (2002) The aging brain. Changes in the neuronal insulin/insulin receptor signal transduction cascade trigger late-onset sporadic Alzhei- mer disease (SAD). A mini-review. J Neural Transm 109:991-1002.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schubert, M., Brazil, D. P., Burks, D. J., Kushner, J. A., Ye, J., Flint, C. L., Farhang-Fallah, J., Dikkes, P., Warot, X. M., Rio, C., Corfas, G., & White, M. F.
Affiliations
Joslin Diabetes Center (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2003-08-06
Volume
23
Issue
18
Pages
7084-7092
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1508589930
Cited by
488
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 29
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (DK38712)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 43808, DK 38712, R01DK038712, R01DK043808)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Keywords
insulin receptor substrate 2, insulin signaling, IGF signaling, brain growth, neuronal proliferation, tau phosphorylation, neurofibrillary tangles, hippocampus, neurodegeneration, diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance, IRS-1, neuroprotection
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Body Weight, Brain, Cell Count, Cell Division, Cell Survival, Cells, Cultured, Cerebellum, Crosses, Genetic, Enzyme Inhibitors, Heterozygote, Neurons, Organ Size, Phosphoproteins, Phosphorylation, Signal Transduction, tau Proteins, Apoptosis, Receptor, IGF Type 1, Mice, Knockout, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Mice, Insulin Receptor Substrate Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review