Cited by 254Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Processing of Emotional Reactivity and Emotional Memory over Sleep

Open access

Abstract

Sleep enhances memories, particularly emotional memories. As such, it has been suggested that sleep deprivation may reduce posttraumatic stress disorder. This presumes that emotional memory consolidation is paralleled by a reduction in emotional reactivity, an association that has not yet been examined. In the present experiment, we used an incidental memory task in humans and obtained valence and arousal ratings during two sessions separated either by 12 h of daytime wake or 12 h including overnight sleep. Recognition accuracy was greater following sleep relative to wake for both negative and neutral pictures. While emotional reactivity to negative pictures was greatly reduced over wake, the negative emotional response was relatively preserved over sleep. Moreover, protection of emotional reactivity was associated with greater time in REM sleep. Recognition accuracy, however, was not associated with REM. Thus, we provide the first evidence that sleep enhances emotional memory while preserving emotional reactivity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2532-11.2012

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 253

Metadata

Authors
Baran, B., Pace-Schott, E. F., Ericson, C., & Spencer, R. M. C.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-01-18
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
1035-1042
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2024614399
Cited by
254
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 5
FWCI
12.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R00AG029710)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
emotional memory consolidation, emotional reactivity, sleep, REM sleep, sleep deprivation, post-traumatic stress disorder, incidental memory, recognition memory, emotional valence, emotional arousal, negative pictures
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Arousal, Circadian Rhythm, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Sleep, Statistics as Topic, Polysomnography, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review