Cited by 49Connexins and lens biologyNeural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Gap Junctions in the Ventral Hippocampal-Medial Prefrontal Pathway Are Involved in Anxiety Regulation

Open access
Schoenfeld, Timothy J., Kloth, Alexander D., Hsueh, Brian, Runkle, Matthew B., Kane, Gary A., Wang, Samuel S.-H., Gould, Elizabeth·2014·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent but little is known about their underlying mechanisms. Gap junctions exist in brain regions important for anxiety regulation, such as the ventral hippocampus (vHIP) and mPFC, but their functions in these areas have not been investigated. Using pharmacological blockade of neuronal gap junctions combined with electrophysiological recordings, we found that gap junctions play a role in theta rhythm in the vHIP and mPFC of adult mice. Bilateral infusion of neuronal gap junction blockers into the vHIP decreased anxiety-like behavior on the elevated plus maze and open field. Similar anxiolytic effects were observed with unilateral infusion of these drugs into the vHIP combined with contralateral infusion into the mPFC. No change in anxious behavior was observed with gap junction blockade in the unilateral vHIP alone or in the bilateral dorsal HIP. Since physical exercise is known to reduce anxiety, we examined the effects of long-term running on the expression of the neuronal gap junction protein connexin-36 among inhibitory interneurons and found a reduction in the vHIP. Despite this change, we observed no alteration in theta frequency or power in long-term runners. Collectively, these findings suggest that neuronal gap junctions in the vHIP–mPFC pathway are important for theta rhythm and anxiety regulation under sedentary conditions but that additional mechanisms are likely involved in running-induced reduction in anxiety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3234-13.2014

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disconnection of LFP coherence by unilateral administration of gap junction blockers in contralateral vHPC and mPFC reduces theta activity in both regions, as well as innate anxiety-like behaviors in ethological tasks.

    “disconnection of LFP coherence by unilateral administration of gap junction blockers in contralateral vHPC and mPFC reduces theta activity in both regions, as well as innate anxiety-like behaviors in ethological tasks135.”

    From Resolving the neural circuits of anxiety (2015) · cites this paper as [135]

  • Disruption of the vHPC theta rhythm using pharmacological blockade of gap junctions reduces anxiety-like behaviors in the elevated plus maze and open field test.

    “Disruption of the vHPC theta rhythm using pharmacological blockade of gap junctions reduces anxiety-like behaviors in the EPM and OFT”

    From Resolving the neural circuits of anxiety (2015) · cites this paper as [135]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schoenfeld, T. J., Kloth, A. D., Hsueh, B., Runkle, M. B., Kane, G. A., Wang, S. S.-H., & Gould, E.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2014-11-19
Volume
34
Issue
47
Pages
15679-15688
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2083218589
Cited by
49
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH091567, MH098651, MH091567, F31MH098651)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007388)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS045193, R01NS045193)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Connexins and lens biology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
gap junctions, ventral hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex, anxiety regulation, anxiety-like behavior, theta oscillations, connexin 36, gap junction blockers, physical activity, running, inhibitory interneurons, elevated plus maze
MeSH terms
Gap Junction delta-2 Protein, Animals, Anxiety, Behavior, Animal, Electroencephalography, Hippocampus, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neural Pathways, Running, Theta Rhythm, Prefrontal Cortex, Gap Junctions, Connexins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review