Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,062

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trial-by-Trial Coupling of Concurrent Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Identifies the Dynamics of Performance Monitoring

Open access
Debener, Stefan, Ullsperger, Markus, Siegel, Markus, Fiehler, Katja, von Cramon, D. Yves, Engel, Andreas K.·2005·The Journal of Neuroscience
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.3286-05.2005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Goal-directed behavior requires the continuous monitoring and dynamic adjustment of ongoing actions. Here, we report a direct coupling between the event-related electroencephalogram (EEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and behavioral measures of performance monitoring in humans. By applying independent component analysis to EEG signals recorded simultaneously with fMRI, we found the single-trial error-related negativity of the EEG to be systematically related to behavior in the subsequent trial, thereby reflecting immediate behavioral adjustments of a cognitive performance monitoring system. Moreover, this trial-by-trial EEG measure of performance monitoring predicted the fMRI activity in the rostral cingulate zone, a brain region thought to play a key role in processing of response errors. We conclude that investigations of the dynamic coupling between EEG and fMRI provide a powerful approach for the study of higher order brain functions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3286-05.2005

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 1997, NeuroImage, 5, 199, 10.1006/nimg.1997.0264 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 1998, NeuroImage, 8, 229, 10.1006/nimg.1998.0361 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 1996, Science, 273, 1868, 10.1126/science.273.5283.1868 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2001, NeuroImage, 14, 48, 10.1006/nimg.2001.0791 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 1996, NeuroImage, 4, 60, 10.1006/nimg.1996.0029 · DOI
  6. 1998, NeuroImage, 8, 140, 10.1006/nimg.1998.0351 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 2005, Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 22, 309, 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.006 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 1994, Psychol Sci, 5, 303, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00630.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. 1995, NeuroImage, 2, 45, 10.1006/nimg.1995.1007 · DOI
  10. 1998, NeuroImage, 7, 30, 10.1006/nimg.1997.0306 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 2002, NeuroImage, 17, 1820, 10.1006/nimg.2002.1326 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 1993, Psychol Sci, 4, 385, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00586.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. 2002, NeuroReport, 13, 2487, 10.1097/00001756-200212200-00022 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 1998, NeuroImage, 7, 754, 10.1016/S1053-8119(18)31587-8 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Holroyd CB, Nieuwenhuis S, Mars RB, Coles MGH (2004) Anterior cingulate cortex, selection for action, and error processing. In: Cognitive neuroscience of attention (Posner MI, ed), pp 219–231. New York: The Guilford Press.
  16. 1997, Hum Brain Mapp, 5, 243, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1997)5:4<243::AID-HBM7>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  17. 2004, Science, 303, 1023, 10.1126/science.1089910 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 1999, Neural Comput, 11, 417, 10.1162/089976699300016719 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 2003, J Neurosci, 23, 3963, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-10-03963.2003 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 2001, Comput Med Imaging Graph, 25, 449, 10.1016/S0895-6111(01)00008-8 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 2000, J Neurosci, 20, 464, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-01-00464.2000 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 2002, Science, 295, 690, 10.1126/science.1066168 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 2004, Trends Cogn Sci, 8, 204, 10.1016/j.tics.2004.03.008 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 2000, NeuroImage, 11, 735, 10.1006/nimg.2000.0568 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 2005, NeuroImage, 28, 720, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.067 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 2004, Psychophysiology, 41, 84, 10.1111/1469-8986.00124 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 1966, J Exp Psychol, 71, 264, 10.1037/h0022853 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 2004, Science, 306, 443, 10.1126/science.1100301 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 1998, Science, 282, 1335, 10.1126/science.282.5392.1335 · DOI
  30. 2004, Curr Opin Neurobiol, 14, 629, 10.1016/j.conb.2004.08.006 · DOI
  31. Talairach P, Tournoux J (1988) A stereotactic coplanar atlas of the human brain. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme.
  32. 2003, NeuroImage, 18, 707, 10.1016/S1053-8119(02)00054-X · DOI
  33. 2001, NeuroImage, 14, 1387, 10.1006/nimg.2001.0935 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 2004, Cortex, 40, 593, 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70155-2 · DOI
  35. 2002, J Cogn Neurosci, 14, 593, 10.1162/08989290260045837 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 2004, Nat Neurosci, 7, 1370, 10.1038/nn1354 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 1995, NeuroImage, 2, 173, 10.1006/nimg.1995.1023 · DOI
  38. 2004, Psychol Rev, 111, 931, 10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.931 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 1997, NeuroImage, 5, 179, 10.1006/nimg.1997.0263 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,062

Metadata

Authors
Debener, S., Ullsperger, M., Siegel, M., Fiehler, K., von Cramon, D. Y., & Engel, A. K.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Society for Neuroscience
Published
2005-12-14
Volume
25
Issue
50
Pages
11730-11737
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
DOI
10.1523/jneurosci.3286-05.2005
OpenAlex
W1997027149
Cited by
1,062
References
10
FWCI
18.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (vor, 182 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.